A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Administered in Combination With Rituximab to Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) - BLISS-BELIEVE

January 27, 2025 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 104-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Administered in Combination With Rituximab to Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

The purpose of this study is to assess whether co-administration of belimumab and a single cycle of rituximab will optimize treatment with belimumab, which will result in improvements of clinical status with a favorable safety profile, by comparing subjects randomized to belimumab plus rituximab versus belimumab plus rituximab-placebo. Approximately 292 subjects will be randomized in a 1:2:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment arms; belimumab plus rituximab-placebo (Arm A, control), belimumab plus rituximab (Arm B, combination), or belimumab plus standard therapy (Arm C, reference). Belimumab will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) and rituximab-placebo or rituximab will be administered by intravenous (IV) infusions. The total duration of the study is for 104 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
292

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Expanded Access

Expanded Access

A way for patients with serious diseases or conditions who cannot participate in a clinical trial to gain access to a medical product that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Also called compassionate use. There are different expanded access types.
No longer available

No longer available

  • Available: Expanded access is currently available for this investigational treatment, and patients who are not participants in the clinical study may be able to gain access to the drug, biologic, or medical device being studied.
  • No longer available: Expanded access was available for this intervention previously but is not currently available and will not be available in the future.
  • Temporarily not available: Expanded access is not currently available for this intervention but is expected to be available in the future.
  • Approved for marketing: The intervention has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use by the public.
 outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
    • Buenos Aires
      • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1046AAQ
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, B1904CFH,
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Tucumán
      • San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucumán, Argentina, T4000AXL
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Brazil
    • Bahía
      • Salvador, Bahía, Brazil, 40.150-150
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Mato Grosso
      • Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil, 78043-142
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Minas Gerais
      • Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 36010-570
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • São Paulo
      • Sao Jose do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, 15090-000
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Quebec
      • Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada, G8Z 1Y2
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7K 0H6
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • France
      • Brest Cedex, France, 29609
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lille Cedex, France, 59037
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Paris cedex 12, France, 75571
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Pessac cedex, France, 33604
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Strasbourg Cedex, France, 67091
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Germany
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Niedersachsen
      • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24105
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 700-721
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of, 501-757
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 400-711
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 133-792
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Suwon-si, Korea, Republic of, 443-380
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Mexico
    • Jalisco
      • Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico, 45070
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Yucatán
      • Merida, Yucatán, Mexico, 97070
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Netherlands
      • Amersfoort, Netherlands, 3813 TZ
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Den Haag, Netherlands, 2545 AA
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Russian Federation
      • Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454076
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420097
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650066
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119435
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630117
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Omsk, Russian Federation, 644111
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation, 185019
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ryazan, Russian Federation, 390026
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 190068
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ufa, Russian Federation, 450005
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation, 432063
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150030
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Spain
      • Badalona, Spain, 08916
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Valencia, Spain, 46017
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Valladolid, Spain, 47010
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain, 36214
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • California
      • La Mesa, California, United States, 92020
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • San Leandro, California, United States, 94578
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Upland, California, United States, 91786
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80230
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806-6264
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tamarac, Florida, United States, 33321
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33613
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-5542
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Brighton, Michigan, United States, 48116
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48910
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48917
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • New Mexico
      • Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States, 88011
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Vandalia, Ohio, United States, 45377
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73102
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • South Carolina
      • Summerville, South Carolina, United States, 29486
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • League City, Texas, United States, 77573
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Wisconsin
      • Glendale, Wisconsin, United States, 53217
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be >=18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Subjects who have clinical diagnosis of SLE based on 4 or more of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.
  • Subjects who have a screening SLEDAI-2K score >=6 (This refers to the total score. Serological activity, i.e., anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid [dsDNA]) positivity and/or hypocomplementemia is not required to be present in SLEDAI-2K assessment, but are scored if present).
  • Subjects who have unequivocally positive autoantibody test results defined as an anti-nuclear (ANA) titer >=1:80 and/or a positive anti-dsDNA (>=30 International Units per milliliter [IU/mL]) serum antibody test from 2 independent time points as follows: Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period. Screening results must be based on the study's central laboratory results. Or, one positive historical test result and 1 positive test result during the screening period.
  • Subjects who are on a stable SLE treatment regimen consisting of any of these medications (alone or in combination) for a period of at least 30 days prior to Day 1 (i.e. day of first dose of study treatment) with the exception that switching one agent for another of the same class for tolerability or availability reasons, which will be allowed within 30 days of Day 1: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisone equivalent); For those subjects on alternating daily doses of steroids, use the average of 2 daily doses to calculate the average daily steroid dose; Any immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory agents including methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, mycophenolate (including mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolate mofetil hydrochloride, and mycophenolate sodium), calcineurin inhibitors (example [e.g.] tacrolimus, cyclosporine), sirolimus, oral cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, mizoribine, or thalidomide; Anti-malarials (e.g., hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, quinacrine); Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
  • Male and/or female. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant not breastfeeding, and at least one of the these conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or A WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and for at least 16 weeks after the last dose of belimumab, or at least 12 months after the last dose of rituximab or rituximab-placebo.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic herpes zoster within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Evidence of active or latent tuberculosis (TB). Documentation may include medical history and examination, chest X-rays (posterior, anterior, and lateral), and TB testing: either a positive tuberculin skin test (TST; defined as a skin induration ≥5 mm at 48 to 72 hours, regardless of Baccillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or other vaccination history) or a positive (not indeterminate) QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus test.
  • Significant allergies to humanized monoclonal antibodies.
  • History of hypersensitivity to belimumab and/or rituximab or known to have titers of human anti-mouse antibody or history of hypersensitivity reactions when treated with other diagnostic or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
  • Lymphoma, leukemia, or any malignancy within the past 5 years (yrs) except for basal cell or squamous epithelial carcinomas of the skin that have been resected with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 yrs.
  • Alanine transferase (ALT) greater than 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN).
  • Bilirubin greater than 1.5 times ULN (isolated bilirubin greater than 1.5 times ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin less than 35%).
  • Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (IgA level less than 10 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]).
  • Immunoglobulin G (IgG) less than 250 mg/dL. For Germany only, IgG less than 400mg/dL.
  • Neutrophils less than 1.5 times 10^9.
  • Current unstable liver or biliary disease per investigator assessment defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis.
  • Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class IV) or other severe, uncontrolled cardiac disease.
  • QT interval corrected (QTc) greater than 450 millisecond (msec) or QTc greater than 480 msec in subjects with bundle branch block.
  • Subjects who have a history of a major organ transplant (e.g., heart, lung, kidney, liver) or hematopoietic stem cell/marrow transplant.
  • Subjects who have clinical evidence of significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic diseases not due to SLE (i.e., cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, psychiatric, malignancy, or infectious diseases) which, in the opinion of the principal investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.
  • Subjects who have an acute or chronic infection requiring management as : Currently on any suppressive therapy for a chronic infection such as pneumocystis, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, herpes zoster, or atypical mycobacteria); Hospitalization for treatment of infection within 60 days of Day 1; subjects who had infection requiring treatment with parenteral (IV or intramuscular [IM]) antibiotics (antibacterials, antivirals, anti-fungals, or anti-parasitic agents) within 60 days of Day 1. Prophylactic anti-infective treatment is allowed.
  • Subjects who have severe lupus kidney disease (defined by proteinuria greater than 6 gram (g)/24 hours or equivalent using spot urine protein to creatinine ratio, or serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL), or have severe active nephritis requiring induction therapy not permitted by protocol (e.g., IV cyclophosphamide), or have required hemodialysis or high dose prednisone or equivalent (greater than 100 mg/day) within 90 days of Day 1.
  • Subjects who have severe active central nervous system (CNS) lupus (including seizures, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, cerebrovascular accident [CVA], cerebritis, or CNS vasculitis) requiring therapeutic intervention within 60 days of Day 1.
  • Subjects who have a planned surgical procedure, laboratory abnormality, or condition (e.g., poor venous access) that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for the study.
  • Subjects who have evidence of serious suicide risk, including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the last 2 months or who, in the investigator's opinion, pose a significant suicide risk.
  • Subjects who have a history of an anaphylaxis reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins, or monoclonal antibodies.
  • Subjects who have received live vaccine(s) within 1 month prior to screening, or plans to receive such vaccines during the screening period or during the study.
  • Subjects who have received any of the these prior/concomitant therapy within 364 days of Day 1: Belimumab; Rituximab; Abatacept; Any B cell targeted therapy (anti-cluster of differentiation-20 [CD] agents other than rituximab, anti CD22 [epratuzumab], anti-CD52 [alemtuzumab], BLyS-receptor fusion protein [BR3], Trans-membrane activator and calcium-modulator and cytophilin ligand interactor [TACI] Fc, anti B-cell activating factor [BAFF] (LY2127399), anti-Interferon alpha agents or anti-BLyS other than belimumab); A biologic investigational agent other than B cell targeted therapy (e.g., abetimus sodium, anti CD40L antibody [BG9588/ IDEC 1311]). (Investigational agent applies to any drug not approved for sale in the country in which it is being used).
  • Subjects who have required 3 or more courses of systemic corticosteroids within 364 days of Day 1. (Topical or inhaled steroids are permitted).
  • Subjects who have received any of these within 90 days of Day 1: Anti- Tumor Necrosis Factor (Anti-TNF) therapy (e.g., adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab); Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra); Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); High dose prednisone or equivalent (greater than 100 mg/day); Plasmapheresis.
  • Subjects who have received any of the these within 60 days of Day 1: A non-biologic investigational agent (Investigational agent applies to any drug not approved for sale in the country in which it is being used); IV cyclophosphamide and, for Germany only, oral cyclophosphamide; Any steroid injection (e.g., intramuscular [IM], intraarticular, or IV).
  • Positive immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test.
  • Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB), defined as HB surface antigen positive (HBsAg+) OR HB core antibody positive (HBcAb+).
  • Positive Hepatitis C (HCV) antibody test.
  • Subjects who have current drug or alcohol dependence, or a history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence within 364 days prior to Day 1.
  • Sensitivity to any of the study treatments, or components thereof, or drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates participation in the study.
  • Unable to administer study treatment (belimumab) by SC injection and has no other reliable resource to administer the injection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Belimumab + Placebo
Eligible subjects will receive Belimumab 200 milligrams (mg) to be administered subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) through Week 52. Subjects will also receive rituximab-placebo to be administered by intravenous (IV) infusions at Weeks 4 and 6 in double blind manner. Subjects will receive standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressants and including anti-malarials, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of less than or equal to (<=) 5 mg/day until Week 104. Subjects will not receive treatment after 52 weeks and will be in observation until Week 104.
Drug: Belimumab
Belimumab will be administered as SC injection once weekly via autoinjector in thigh or abdomen
Drug: Rituximab-placebo
Saline will be administered as IV infusions at Week 4 and Week 6
Drug: Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants)
Standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressant will contain anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids with prednisone dose equivalent to <= 5 mg/day will administered through Week 104.
Drug: Steroid Taper
Steroid taper will include prednisone doses equivalent to =< 5 mg/day in all Arms through Week 104.
Experimental: Belimumab + Rituximab
Eligible subjects will receive Belimumab 200 mg to be administered SC on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) through Week 52. Subjects will also receive rituximab 1000 mg to be administered by IV infusions at Weeks 4 and 6 in double blind manner. Subjects will receive standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressants and including anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of <= 5 mg/day until Week 104. Subjects will not receive treatment after 52 weeks and will be in observation until Week 104.
Drug: Belimumab
Belimumab will be administered as SC injection once weekly via autoinjector in thigh or abdomen
Drug: Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants)
Standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressant will contain anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids with prednisone dose equivalent to <= 5 mg/day will administered through Week 104.
Drug: Steroid Taper
Steroid taper will include prednisone doses equivalent to =< 5 mg/day in all Arms through Week 104.
Drug: Rituximab
Rituximab will be administered as IV infusion of 1000mg at Week 4 and Week 6
Other: Belimumab + Standard therapy
Eligible subjects will receive open-label Belimumab 200 mg administered SC on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) until Week 104. Subjects will also receive standard therapy including immunosuppressant, anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of <= 5 mg/day until Week 104.
Drug: Belimumab
Belimumab will be administered as SC injection once weekly via autoinjector in thigh or abdomen
Drug: Steroid Taper
Steroid taper will include prednisone doses equivalent to =< 5 mg/day in all Arms through Week 104.
Drug: Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants)
Standard therapy will contain stable SLE medications including immunosuppressant to be administered from baseline through Week 104.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (Independent blinded assessor [IBA]) was defined as the percentage of participants with a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000(SLEDAI-2K)score less than or equal to(<=)2 achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day at Week 52. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in previous 10 days,consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission at Week 64
Time Frame: Week 64
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission (IBA) was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic [dsDNA] and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day at Week 64. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days, consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Week 64
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control at Week 104
Time Frame: Week 104
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (IBA) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day at Week 104. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control by Visits
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (IBA) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Weeks 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission by Visits
Time Frame: Weeks 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission (IBA) was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days, consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity
Weeks 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Complete Remission (CR) Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks During Week 52 to Week 104
Time Frame: Week 52 to Week 104
Percentage of participants with a state of CR (Principal Investigator [PI] assessed) was defined as percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K=0 achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day,sustained for at least 24 weeks. Sustained CR was longest period a participant maintains CR without break calculated as last consecutive CR date minus first consecutive CR date plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores indicates increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of CR sustained for at least 24 weeks at any visit during Week 52 to Week 104 were reported.
Week 52 to Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission (CLR) Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks From Week 80 to Week 104
Time Frame: From Week 80 to Week 104
Percentage of participants with a state of CLR (PI assessed) at Week 104 was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score=0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores) achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day, sustained for at least 24 weeks(from Week 80 to Week 104). Sustained CLR is longest period a participant maintains CLR without a break, calculated as last consecutive CLR date minus first consecutive CLR date plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
From Week 80 to Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Complete Remission by Visits
Time Frame: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Percentage of participants with a state of complete remission (PI assessed) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score =0, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in the previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within for each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Time to First Severe Flare
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Time to first severe SLE flare was the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event. Time to first severe flare was defined as event date minus treatment start date plus 1. Time to first severe flare was measured by Modified SLE flare index which identifies whether a participant had experienced a mild/moderate or severe flare. Analysis of first severe flare was performed on the modified SLE Flare index that excludes severe flares that were triggered only by an increase is SLEDAI-2K score to greater than 12.
Up to Week 104
Time to First Flare
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Time to first SLE flare was the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event. Time to first flare was defined as event date minus treatment start date plus 1. Time to first flare was measured by modified SLE flare index which identifies whether a participant had experienced a mild/moderate or severe flare.
Up to Week 104
Time to Disease Control Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks and Maintained Through Week 104
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Disease control sustained for at least 24 weeks and maintained through Week 104 was defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. Time to disease control (PI assessed) was defined as the first visit of sustained disease control until Week 104 on or before Week 80 minus treatment start date (Day 1) plus 1. Sustained disease control was longest period a participant maintained disease control without a break. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K , ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Up to Week 104
Time to Clinical Remission Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks and Maintained Through Week 104
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Clinical remission sustained for at least 24 weeks and maintained through Week 104 was defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K score=0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. Time to CLR (PI assessed) was defined as first visit of sustained CLR until Week 104 on or before Week 80 minus treatment start date (Day 1) plus 1. Sustained CLR was longest period a participant maintained clinical remission without a break. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Up to Week 104
Duration of Disease Control
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Duration of disease control was defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. The duration of disease control (PI assessed) was the longest period between 2 visits that the participant was a disease control responder at all visits and calculated as the first visit of disease control minus last visit of disease control plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores representing increased disease activity
Up to Week 104
Duration of Clinical Remission
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Clinical remission was defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. The duration of clinical remission (PI assessed) was the longest period between 2 visits that the participant was a clinical remission responder at all visits and was calculated as the first visit of clinical remission minus last visit of clinical remission plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Up to Week 104
Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score by Visit (PI Assessed)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
The SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in the preceding 10 days. Weighted scores for central nervous system (CNS) (7 items) was 8; for vascular (1 item) was 8; for Musculoskeletal (2 items) was 4; for Renal (4 items) was 4; for Mucocutaneous (3 items) was 2; for Cardiovascular and Respiratory (2 items) was 2; for Immunologic (2 items) was 2;for Constitutional (1 item) was 1 and for Hematologic (2 items) was 1. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With SLEDAI-2K Organ Improvement Compared to Baseline by Visits (PI Assessed)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
SLEDAI-2K assessments consisted of 24 individual items with 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of analysis. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms). Higher scores indicates increased disease activity. An improvement was defined as a decrease(compared to Baseline) in SLEDAI-2K score within same organ system at a post-Baseline visit. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Data for following organ systems was reported: CNS total, Vascular total, Musculoskeletal total, Renal total, Mucocutaneous total, Cardiovascular (Cardio) and Respiratory (Resp) total, Immunologic total and Hematologic total. Constitutional organ system was removed from analysis and its one item (fever)moved to hematologic organ system.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With SLEDAI-2K Organ Worsening Compared to Baseline by Visits (PI Assessed)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
SLEDAI-2K assessments consisted of 24 individual items with 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at time of analysis. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms). Higher scores indicates increased disease activity. A worsening was defined as an increase(compared to Baseline) in SLEDAI-2K score within same organ system at a post-Baseline visit. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Percentage of participants with SLEDAI-2K organ worsening for following organ systems were reported;CNS total,Vascular total,Musculoskeletal total,Renal total,Mucocutaneous total,Cardio and Resp total,Immunologic total and Hematologic total. Constitutional organ system was removed from analysis and its one item (fever)moved to hematologic organ system.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) by Visits
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) was a physician-reported visual analogue scale that provides an overall measure of the participant's current disease activity. Physician's Global Assessment was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). The PGA score was then rescaled for reporting by multiplying the collected score by 3 divided by 10. Hence, the PGA score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) -American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index Worsening Compared With Baseline at Week 52 and Week 104
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 52 and Week 104
The SLICC-ACR Damage Index measures irreversible (not related to active inflammation) changes occurring since the diagnosis of SLE ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. The questionnaire contains 39 items covering 12 different organ systems which were scored on a numerical scale between 0 (no damage) to 7 (increasing disease damage). Individual ranges for organ systems were; ocular: 0-2, neuropsychiatric: 0-6, renal: 0-3, pulmonary: 0-5, cardiovascular:0-6, peripheral vascular: 0-5, gastrointestinal:0-5, musculoskeletal: 0-6, skin: 0-3, endocrine (diabetes): 0-1, gonadal:0-1 and malignancies: 0-2. The SLICC-ACR score was calculated by taking sum of the individual scores for 12 organ systems which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 45 (increasing disease damage) where higher score indicates increasing disease damage severity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits.
Baseline (Day 1), Week 52 and Week 104
Percentage of Participants That Met the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Response Criteria by Visits (PI Assessed)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety. The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) SLEDAI-2K <=4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, CNS, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity; (2) no new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; (3) PGA (scale 0-3), <=1; (4) current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose <=7.5 mg daily; and (5) well tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents, excluding investigational drugs. Percentage of participants that met the LLDAS response criteria were reported.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control Using the PI Assessment of SLEDAI-2K by Visit
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day, using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms), higher scores representing increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of disease control using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K were summarized.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission Using the PI Assessment of SLEDAI-2K by Visit
Time Frame: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission was defined as the percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants (which was allowed in Belimumab+ Standard therapy arm only) and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K were summarized.
Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Non-serious AE (Non-SAE)
Time Frame: Up to Week 111 (including 8 weeks of safety follow-up)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Data for number of participants with SAE and non-SAE (>=5 %) has been summarized.
Up to Week 111 (including 8 weeks of safety follow-up)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. AESIs were Malignant Neoplasms, Post-Injection Systemic Reactions (PISR), All Infections of Special Interest (Opportunistic Infections (OI), Herpes Zoster (HZ), Tuberculosis (TB), and Sepsis), Depression (including mood disorders and anxiety)/suicide/self-injury and Deaths. Data for number of participants with AESIs has been summarized.
Up to Week 104
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) by Visits
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
The Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity is a single-item, participant reported scale developed for the assessment of the participant's overall rating of their disease activity due to SLE. The scale measures disease activity ranging from 0 (Very Well) to 10 (Very Poor) and the higher score indicates severe disease activity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Domain Scores by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health related qualify of life (HRQOL) instrument with 34 questions across 8 domains:Physical health(8 items),Pain(3 items),Planning(3 items),Intimate relationship(2 items),Burden to others(3 items),Emotional health(6 items),Body image(5 items),Fatigue(4 items). Questions were related to participants experience in prior 4 weeks.A 5-point Likert response format was used, ranging from 0(all of the time) to 4(never) for each question. Individual domain scores were reported which were calculated by taking sum of responses to all items within each domain. Individual domain scores range:Physical health(0-32),Pain(0-12),Planning(0-12),Intimate relationship(0-8),Burden to others(0-12),Emotional health(0-24),Body image(0-20),Fatigue(0-16). Higher score indicates better HRQOL. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item questionnaire completed by the participant, which provides a measure of fatigue/quality of life, with a 7-day recall period. The participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The higher score for the questions, the greater the fatigue. The total score was the sum of the responses from all questions (inverted for reversed items) multiplied by 13, then divided by the number of questions answered, ranging from 0 (worse fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue) where a higher score indicates an improvement in the participant's health status and decrease in the score indicates worse fatigue/quality of life. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in FACIT-Fatigue Score Exceeding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID, Greater Than or Equal to [>=]4)
Time Frame: Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item questionnaire completed by the participant, which provides a measure of fatigue/quality of life, with a 7-day recall period. The participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions, the greater the fatigue. The total score was the sum of the responses (inverted for reversed items) multiplied by 13, then divided by the number of questions answered, ranging from 0 (worse fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue) where a higher score indicates an improvement in the participant's health status and decrease in the score indicates worse fatigue/quality of life. A participant was considered to had an improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference if they had >=4 points improvement in their FACIT-Fatigue Scale score from Baseline. Percentage of participants with improvement in FACIT-Fatigue scale score exceeding the MCID (>=4 points) were summarized.
Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 29, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 205646
  • 2016-003050-32 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

GSK will assess requests from qualified researchers for anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents. Data sharing is subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. For further information, refer to https://www.gsk-studyregister.com/About_GSK_Patient_Level_Data_Sharing_Final_13July2023.pdf

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Anonymized IPD is made available within 6 months of publication of primary, key secondary and safety results for studies in product with approved indication(s) or terminated asset(s) across all indications.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Anonymized IPD is shared with researchers whose proposals are approved by an Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension may be granted, when justified, for up to 6 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Clinical Trials on Belimumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings