Achilles Pain Block (APB)

July 1, 2019 updated by: Ruth Chimenti

Impact of Peripheral Pain Perception on Central Sensitization and Movement Strategies in Patients With Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy

The purpose of this study is to better understand how the peripheral and central nervous system interact to produce the sensation of pain and motor patterns in patients with achilles tendinopathy (AT). These findings will motivate the development of future clinical studies that incorporate knowledge about pain processing and movement strategies in patients with tendinopathy. Participants with achilles tendinopathy will receive an anesthetic injection to the achilles tendon in order to examine how reduced pain, detected by the peripheral nervous system, alters task performance and perception of pain. We hypothesize that there are factors within the central nervous system that contribute to continued pain and disability in patients with chronic AT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Twenty three people with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) and 23 people without AT will participate in this single visit clinical study. Participants will rate their pain with pressure to the heel, leg and elbow, climb stairs and perform a novel task in a motion capture system, and complete questionnaires on how pain affects their daily life. All subjects will complete these measures twice, and for participants with AT they will complete this battery of tests before and after an anesthetic injection to the area of pain. This study has 2 aims:

Specific Aim 1 compares measures of altered central processing in patients with chronic AT to adults without chronic pain; we hypothesize that patients with chronic AT will demonstrate signs of altered central processing, including central sensitization (lower pressure pain threshold), psychosocial factors (higher kinesiophobia), and/or altered motor control (lower ankle power during stair ascent).

Specific Aim 2 determines which indicators of altered central processing persist after a local anesthetic injection to the Achilles tendon in patients with chronic AT; we hypothesize chronic AT pain is perpetuated by altered central processing that persists in the absence of continued peripheral nociception.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

For patients with AT

Inclusion Criteria:

- Clinical diagnosis of chronic (>3 months) AT, consisting of pain with pressure at the achilles tendon and report of pain that is aggravated by physical activity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of foot or ankle surgery, bilateral lateral epicondyle tendinopathy
  • Comorbidity that would be aggravated by placing hand in water (Raynaud's, thoracic outlet syndrome)
  • Comorbidity (e.g. stroke, neurological disorder) that limits ability to participate in exercise
  • Comorbidity (e.g. rheumatic disease, fibromyalgia) that contributes to pain with activity
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Previous adverse response to a local anesthetic injection
  • Are pregnant
  • Are a ballroom dancer

For control participants

Inclusion Criteria:

- Sex, Age and BMI-matched to participant with AT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No history of tendinopathy
  • No condition that limited activity in the past 6 months
  • History of foot or ankle surgery, bilateral lateral epicondyle tendinopathy
  • Comorbidity that would be aggravated by placing hand in water (Raynaud's, thoracic outlet syndrome)
  • Comorbidity (e.g. stroke, neurological disorder) that limits ability to participate in exercise
  • Comorbidity (e.g. rheumatic disease, fibromyalgia) that contributes to pain with activity
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Are pregnant
  • Are a ballroom dancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group with Achilles Tendinopathy
Ropivacaine injection. While looking at the Achilles tendon with ultrasound, the orthopaedic physician will inject 4 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (numbing medicine) around the area of pain. The needle may be directed just under the skin (and above the tendon) and/or deep to the tendon.
Drug: Ropivacaine injection
single dose, subcutaneous injection
No Intervention: Group without Achilles Tendinopathy
The control group did not receive an injection between test repetitions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central Sensitization
Time Frame: Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) at heel on contralateral side. A pressure algometer (Somedic, Farsta, Sweden) was applied perpendicular to the skin at a rate of 50 kilopascal/s with a 1cm2 tip. The participants pressed a button when the sensation of pressure first became painful (1/10 on NPRS). The mean of 3 trials per area represented the PPT.
Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Pain Psychology
Time Frame: Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK, score range 17 to 68). A decrease in TSK would indicate a decrease in fear of injury (and/or re-injury)
Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Movement System
Time Frame: Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Change in peak ankle power during the stance phase of gait during stair ascent, which will be assessed by syncing movement data from 3-dimensional motion analysis with ground reaction force data from a force plate. Peak positive ankle power reflects the ability of the plantar flexor muscles to concentrically generate speed and force at the ankle joint.
Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ruth Chimenti

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ruth L Chimenti, DPT, PhD, University of Iowa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 28, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 10, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201508804

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Achilles Tendon Pain

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine injection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings