Serum S100B Protein Assay in Mild Head Injury (TCLAS-100B)

November 16, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Evaluation of the Serum S100B Protein Assay in the Management of Mild Head Injury Under Anticoagulation

Head injuries are a major public health issue, with an estimated annual incidence in Europe of 262 per 100,000 population. Light head injury (SCI), defined by a Glasgow score between 13 and 15, constitutes the majority (71% to 98%) of head injury cases. Despite a generally good prognosis, patients with TCL have a low but real risk of brain damage, whose prevalence is estimated at 5%. Cerebral computed tomography (CT) because of its high sensitivity for the detection of posttraumatic intracranial lesions (LIC), is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of these lesions in patients considered at risk after clinical evaluation. The number of cTCTs performed is high with no lesion in more than 90% of cases. The S100B protein, a marker of brain tissue damage, is reported to reliably exclude the presence of brain lesions in adults as well as antiaggregants. These numerous studies show that its serum assay in combination with the clinical decision algorithms allows, thanks to a sensitivity close to 100% for brain lesions, to reduce the number of CTMc currently prescribed by approximately 30%, and therefore to decrease unnecessary exposure to radiation. Although there is no study on the subject, a gain on the duration of care in emergencies can be expected as well as a reduction on the cost of care by a dosage price three times less higher than the TDMc. Expert opinion for the use of this assay in the management of moderate-risk TCL at threshold ≤ 0.10 μg / L in 3h post-TC to ensure sensitivity of 100%, was published in 2014 in the Annales Françaises de Médecine d'Urgence.

The use of anticoagulants has continued to increase in recent years. In 2013, it is estimated that 3.12 million patients received at least one anticoagulant in France. Currently, the international and French recommendations indicate the achievement of cTCT in anticoagulated TCL because it is an independent risk factor for cerebral injury and is therefore considered to be a high risk TCL. LIC. The hypothesis of this study is that the S100B protein assay could also exclude the presence of brain lesion after TCL under anticoagulation in adults

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Caen University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Cranial Trauma having induced a Glasgow <13
  • Presence of a high risk factor to perform a brain scan (formal indication of cTCT): Focused neurological deficit, Glasgow score <15 at 2 hr, suspicion of open skull fracture or embarrassment, all Sign of fracture of the base of the skull (hemotympanum, bilateral periorbital ecchymosis), otorrhea or rhinorrhea of CSF, convulsion post traumatic.
  • Cranial Trauma time unknown
  • Fuzzy anamnesis
  • Traumatized severe / polytraumatized (victim of a violent trauma, according to the kinetic criteria of Vittel, whatever are the apparent lesions and / or 2 lesions or more of which at least one threatens the vital prognosis)
  • Refusal to participate
  • Refusal to perform a TDMc
  • Congenital or acquired coagulopathy
  • Decision not to carry out a TDMc
  • Active melanoma

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patient
  • Emergency department patient with mild head trauma (13 ≤ Glasgow score ≤ 15)
  • Affiliated to the social security scheme
  • Patient having been informed about the study and do not disagree to participate
  • Patient on anticoagulant therapy (enteral or parenteral route)

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
S100B protein serum concentration
Time Frame: baseline (maximum 3 hours after head trauma)
The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether a negative serum assay of S100B protein (≤ 0.10 μg / L) within 3 hours after head trauma
baseline (maximum 3 hours after head trauma)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Caen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 16, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17-091

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Light Head Injury

Clinical Trials on serum S100B protein assay measurement

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings