Accelerated Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Surgery

April 17, 2020 updated by: Irem Duzgun, Hacettepe University
The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of an accelerated rehabilitation regime for patients undergoing early arthroscopic stabilization for first-time anterior dislocation in terms of clinical outcome, return to play data and recurrence rates.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Traditional rehabilitation regimes post arthroscopic stabilization commonly stipulate a period of immobilization of between 2 weeks and 6 weeks.This is apparently embedded in practice and is reportedly based on tissue healing times. However early mobilisation would allow good clinical results in terms of clinical outcome, return to play data and recurrence rates.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient were included based on their history of a clear mechanism of injury resulting in traumatic anterior dislocation, with clear evidence of labral injury confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with inflammatory, autoimmune, endocrine or kidney diseases
  • Recurrence
  • Bony Bankart Lesion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: accelerated rehabilitation after surgery
patients were included progressive rehabilitation programme first week after arthroscopic bankart repair consisting of passive shoulder range of motion exercises, scapular retraction exercises. The exercise programme progressed from active range of motion exercises to resistive and plyometric shoulder exercises. Patients were followed for six months.
advances in arthroscopic surgery have resulted in biomechanically stronger repairs that might allow for accelerated rehabilitation protocols and hence faster return to daily living activities and scapular control
Experimental: delayed rehabilitation after surgery
Patients were not allowed to start passive shoulder exercises first three weeks after surgery. Patients were included progressive rehabilitation programme third week after arthroscopic bankart repair consisting of passive shoulder range of motion exercises, scapular retraction exercises. The exercise programme progressed from active range of motion exercises to resistive and plyometric shoulder exercises. Patients were followed for six months.
Patients were not allowed to start rehabilitation programme first three weeks after surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3 Dimensional Kinematic Analysis
Time Frame: at sixth months after surgery
Scapular kinematic measurements were conducted by using three-dimensional electromagnetic system (Motion Monitor® Skeleton Analysis System, Innovative Sports Training Inc, Chicago, USA). The three-dimensional electromagnetic system consists of motion monitor software, transmitters and sensors integrated into this software (Flock of Birds System).
at sixth months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: at sixth months after surgery
Pain was assessed by using numeric Visual Analogue Scale at rest, at night and during daily living activities. In numeric Visual Analogue Scale 0 represents "no pain", 10 represents "unbearable pain"
at sixth months after surgery
First Functional Assessment
Time Frame: at sixth months after surgery
1. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities and that measures an individual's ability to complete tasks, absorb forces, and severity of symptoms.This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale.DASH Questionnaire will be calculated by using DASH Scoring Formula
at sixth months after surgery
Second Functional Assessment
Time Frame: at sixth months after surgery
2. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) is used to measure shoulder pain and functional limitations.The scores range from 0 to 100 and the highest score represents improvement in shoulder function after treatment interventions and to check the patient's ability to tolerate or perform the activities of daily living.
at sixth months after surgery
Third Functional Assessment
Time Frame: at sixth months after surgery
3. Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (CONSTANT) is a 100-points scale composed of individual parameters.These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient.The Constant Score was introduced to determine the functionality after the treatment of a shoulder injury.The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion (40 points).The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function.
at sixth months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GO 16/471-14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bankart Lesion

Clinical Trials on Accelerated rehabilitation

Search Similar Trials