Response to Donepezil, Drug Plasma Concentration and the CYP2D6 and APOE Genetic Polymorphisms

December 14, 2017 updated by: Luís Felipe José Ravic de Miranda, Federal University of Minas Gerais

Clinical Response to Donepezil in Mild and Moderate Dementia: Relationship to the Drug Plasma Concentration and the CYP2D6 and APOE Genetic Polymorphisms

Pharmacological treatment of AD is currently based on cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) and memantine, which have been shown to lead to modest, although effective, clinical benefits. Donepezil is a ChEI metabolized through the cytochrome P (CYP) 450, primarily by the 3A4 and 2D6 isoforms. The CYP2D6 gene presents polymorphisms that can alter its expression. The plasma therapeutic level ranges from 30 to 75 ng/mL, and 50% of acetylcholinesterase inhibition is achieved when the concentration reaches 15.6 ng/mL. An optimal plasma level is greater than 50 ng/mL.

These polymorphisms may influence the individual's response to treatment with donepezil and the concentration of the drug in AD patients, without achieving the desired effect. However, most of the individuals are EM, i.e., the metabolism of the drug occurs according to the expected kinetics and is associated with the presence of one or two wild-type alleles.

Objective: investigate the pattern of clinical response to donepezil in a group of patients with AD and AD with cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in relation to the plasmatic concentration of donepezil and polymorphisms of the CYP2D6 and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Patients taking donepezil were seen four times (from June 2009 to March 2013) and were submitted to the MMSE test, the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer'sDisease battery (CERAD), and the Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire. CERAD memory evaluation was further divided into five components: incidental recall (CERAD151 INC), immediate recall 1 and 2 (CERAD-RM1, CERAD-RM2, respectively) and delayed recall after five minutes (CERAD-R). Each aspect was analyzed individually and compared between groups at baseline and after 12 months of treatment with donepezil. All patients had blood samples (10mL) collected to obtain donepezil plasmatic concentration (DPC) measurements and for APOE and CYP2D6 genotyping.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A longitudinal, naturalist study, conducted at the Geriatric Outpatient Clinic of the Hospital das Clínicas at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), in Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil.

The sample comprised patients evaluated from June, 2009 until March, 2013

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients fulfilling the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria of probable AD dementia or the NINDS-AIREN (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherché et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences) diagnostic criteria of AD with cerebrovascular disease (AD + CVD)
  • Patients presenting mild or moderate dementia according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), i.e., CDR 1 or 2, respectively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with ChEI or memantine before study entry
  • Patients diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies or vascular dementia,
  • Patients classified as CDR 3 or with Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Illiterate patients
  • Disagreement between the first investigator and the treating physician regarding the diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Association among donepezil serum concentration after 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment onset and clinical response.
Time Frame: September, 2009 until March, 2013
Evaluate the serum concentration of donepezil after 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment onset in patients considered good responders (i.e., those who had an increment >1 in MMSE in comparison to baseline assessment after 1 year of donepezil treatment) in contrast to those considered bad responders (i.e., who had a reduction, a stabilization or an increment of 1 in MMSE in comparison to baseline assessment after 1 year of donepezil treatment).
September, 2009 until March, 2013

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of baseline cognitive performance
Time Frame: June, 2009 until March, 2012
Assess the baseline cognitive performance among included patients (notedly, MMSE test, CERAD batteries, and in the Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire).
June, 2009 until March, 2012
Evaluation of CYP2D6 and APOE polymorphisms
Time Frame: June, 2009 until March, 2012
Evaluation of CYP2D6 and APOE polymorphisms among included patients.
June, 2009 until March, 2012
Evaluate donepezil serum concentration after 3 months of treatment onset.
Time Frame: September, 2009 until June, 2012
Measurement of donepezil serum concentration after 3 months of treatment onset.
September, 2009 until June, 2012
Evaluate donepezil serum concentration after 6 months of treatment onset.
Time Frame: December, 2009 until September, 2012
Measurement of donepezil serum concentration after 6 months of treatment onset.
December, 2009 until September, 2012
Evaluate donepezil serum concentration after 12 months of treatment onset.
Time Frame: June, 2010 until March, 2013
Measurement of donepezil serum concentration after 12 months of treatment onset.
June, 2010 until March, 2013

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of Minas Gerais

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Paulo Caramelli, MD, PhD, Federal University of Minas Gerais

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0172 /2010

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Late Onset Alzheimer Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings