Trauma Triage Decision With Software (TraumaDS) (TraumaDS)

November 29, 2017 updated by: Ahmet Akdoğan, Derince Training and Research Hospital

Triage With Software Assistance To Trauma Patient Who Attending To Emergency Department

It is intended to show that a computer software called Trauma Decision System (TravmaDS) for the determination of the urgency of trauma patients who applied to Emergency Medical Clinic gives more accurate, more objective, faster results than the triage scored by medical and non-medical personnel and to show the fact that TraumaDS provides more patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

There are limitations in our routine standard of practice in Emergency medical clinic in rapid triage about the adequacy particularly in the patient group where specific and rapid decision-making, such as trauma. The process of evaluating the patients who are directed to the green area unnecessarily in trauma care by the physician is prolonged, the evaluation process of patients who are directed to the red area unnecessarily shortens but hospital resources are being used extensively. Therefore, in this study, it was planned to perform objective triage with a computer based scoring system. Triage scoring determined by the Ministry of Health (SB ), routinely performed by an emergency medical technician (EMT), will be applied when the patients are admitted to emergency services. According to this scoring, patients who need urgent care and who should not wait less than 15 minutes will be considered red coded, patients who can wait up to 60 minutes will be considered yellow coded, patients who can wait for 120 minutes or more will be considered green coded. To the other group, triage maintenance / evaluation will be done with computer software developed by us. All patients with trauma should be included in the study, demographic data, trauma mechanism and trauma type vital signs at the time of application of the patients will be routinely observed in both groups of patients. These observations are routine for this disease group and we will not undertake any interventional procedures or screening except special routine application for research purposes. The observation and file information will be organized by the triage staff in both groups at the time of the application of the patients. In this software-based program before working on the software informative training will be given to triage staff and for this patient triage handheld computers will be given to triage staff. In order for the referring patients to be able to see the entries made with the triage software a simultaneous large-screen monitor will be used. At the time of application, color codes indicating the urgency of the patients will be given according to the demographic data of the patients, the type of trauma and the vital signs were directed by the software program. As a result of the software program's direction, patients will be coded as green-yellow-orange-red area and patient care will be made in accordance with these codes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Kocaeli
      • Derince, Kocaeli, Turkey, 41900
        • Recruiting
        • Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

all trauma patients who want to participate in the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all trauma patients who want to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who do not want to participate, who are not triaged, who leave the hospital before the treatment is completed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Normal Triage
Triage scoring determined by the Ministry of Health (SB ), routinely performed by an emergency medical technician (att), will be applied when the patients are admitted to emergency services. According to this scoring, patients who need urgent care and who should not wait less than 15 minutes will be considered red coded, patients who can wait up to 60 minutes will be considered yellow coded, patients who can wait for 120 minutes or more will be considered green coded.
Software Triage
triage maintenance / evaluation will be done with computer software called "Trauma Decision System (TraumaDS)" developed by us. As a result of the software program's direction, patients will be coded as green-yellow-orange-red area and patient care will be made in accordance with these codes. According to this scoring, patients who need urgent care and who should not wait will be considered red code, patients who should wait less than 15 minutes will be considered orange coded, patients who can wait up to 60 minutes will be considered yellow coded, patients who can wait for 120 minutes or more will be considered green coded.
Other: Trauma Decision System
At the time of application, color codes indicating the urgency of the patients will be given according to the demographic data of the patients, the type of trauma and the vital signs were directed by the software program. As a result of the software program's direction, patients will be coded as green-yellow-orange-red area and patient care will be made in accordance with these codes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between software triage time and traditional triage time
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Investigation difference of triages made by software and normal triage
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined as mortality within 30 days of arrival to hospital
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Derince Training and Research Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ahmet Akdoğan, RA, Research assistant

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017/145

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings