Correlation Between iXip and Final Pathology Specimen From Radical Prostatectomy: a Multicenter Prospective Trial

July 17, 2018 updated by: Alessandro Antonelli, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia

Correlation Between Immune compleX Predictive Index and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness at Radical Prostetecomy Specimens: a Multicenter Prospective Trial

The Immune compleX Predictive Index (iXip) is a predictive tool for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis that integrates PSA, PSA-IgM, prostate volume and age of the patient. An algorithm processes these parameters providing the probability of prostate cancer. Several prospective studies confirmed its ability to predict prostate cancer presence at biopsy and therefore to reduce the rate of useless prostate biopsies. Moreover, preliminary results from a prospective study showed that iXip could predict cancer aggressiveness, too.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Since the 90s, serum PSA has become the cornerstone of diagnosis of PCa, However, due to its proven poor specificity, the actual role of PSA testing has been largely debated, especially if used during opportunistic screening programs. leading to a significant risk of over-diagnosis and over treatment.

In order to overcome drawbacks of PSA-based diagnostic pathway several PSA-derivates has been proposed. However, they were marginally used in clinical practice because not supplied by public health care systems.

The Immune compleX Predictive Index (iXip) is a predictive tool for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis that integrates PSA, PSA-IgM, prostate volume and age of the patient. An algorithm processes these parameters providing the probability of prostate cancer. Several prospective studies confirmed its ability to predict prostate cancer presence at biopsy and therefore to reduce the rate of useless prostate biopsies. Moreover, preliminary results from a prospective study showed that iXip could predict cancer aggressiveness, too.

All pathological specimens are analyzed by an expert uropathologist, following ISUP reccomandations.

Before radical prostectomy a blood sample from each patients is collected. Serum PSA-IgM concentration is measured using Prostate-IC kit in duplicate. The analysis with Prostate-IC kit was performed on automated ELISA analyzer.Then the iXip index is calculated by using the online calculator (http://ixip.xeptagen.com/).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male patients with prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy

Description

Inclusion Criteria are:

  • histologically proven prostate cancer,
  • patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy
  • paziente able to provide consent
  • age > 18 years or < 80 years

Exclusion criteria are:

  • neiadjuvant hormone therapy
  • salvage radical prostatectomy
  • concomitant solid or hematological tumors,
  • autoimmune disorders
  • or immunosuppressive therapies,
  • acute bacterial or viral infections.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between iXip and significant prostate carcer
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and significant prostate carcer at final pathology specimens, defined as tumor volume > 0.5 cm3 and Gleason scor equal or superior to 7. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features.
6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between iXip and tumor volume > 0.5 cm3
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( >0.5cm3 tumor volume )
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and tumor volume > 2.5 cm3
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( >2.5cm3 tumor volume ).
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and Gleason Score >6
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( Gleason Score> 6)
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and pathological stage > pT2
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( pathological staging >pT2)
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and positive lymph node at final pathology specimens
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( positive lymph nodes >0)
6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro Antonelli, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia (Italy)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PSA-IgM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Immune compleX Predictive Index

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings