Contrast RISK (Reducing Injury Sustained by Kidneys) (Contrast RISK)

November 27, 2023 updated by: University of Calgary

Evaluating Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiac Catheterization

Diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization procedures are important interventions to reduce the risk of death, avoid future cardiovascular events, and improve quality of life of people with heart disease. However, exposure to the radiocontrast dyes required for these procedures can lead to contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI); a common and costly complication. There are accurate ways to identify patients at increased risk of this complication and strategies to prevent CI-AKI. This involves ensuring that patients who are at risk have procedures done with the minimum amount of X-ray contrast dye required, and that they receive optimal intravenous fluids at the time of the procedure.

This study will evaluate the implementation of a strategy where computerized decision support tools are used to help doctors identify patients at risk of CI-AKI, as well as make decisions about how much contrast dye to use and how much intravenous fluid to provide to patients who are identified at risk of CI-AKI in cardiac catheterization.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Overview: Randomized stepped-wedge trial to evaluate the impact of implementing a computerized decision support strategy that incorporates CI-AKI risk prediction and calculation of safe contrast dye limits and intravenous fluid recommendations.

Study Population: Adult patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional coronary angiography procedures will be eligible if not already receiving dialysis. Patients receiving emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction will be excluded.

Intervention: Multivariable clinical risk prediction model to estimate risk of CI-AKI and safe contrast limits for patients above the median (>5%) predicted risk of CI-AKI. Intravenous fluids recommendations based on weight and left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure will also be provided for patients identified above the median risk of CI-AKI.

The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Cath-PCI Registry AKI risk model will be used to estimated the predicted risk of CI-AKI, and safe contrast limits will be estimated using the ePRISM, Acute Kidney Injury Model with Contrast Sensitivities and Dialysis Risk (Health Outcomes Sciences) software, incorporated within the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Cardiac Catheterization software.

Study Design: Using a stepped-wedge design, clusters of cardiologists who perform diagnostic or therapeutic cardiac catheterization in each centre will be randomized to be introduced to the intervention at sequential time points spaced over 20 months. At each step, cardiologists who have not yet been randomized will serve as controls.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7280

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Foothills Medical Centre
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • Royal Alexandra Hospital
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • University of Alberta Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography or coronary intervention in Alberta

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • Receiving dialysis at time of cardiac catheterization procedure
  • Non-Alberta resident

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Cardiologists will receive computerized clinical decision support information for CI-AKI prevention for patients identified above the median (> 5%) risk of AKI based on the NCDR risk prediction model for CI-AKI.
Other: Intervention

Computerized clinical decision support intervention. This intervention consists of 2 decision support components for CI-AKI prevention:

  1. Estimation of safe contrast limit to reduce the relative risk of CI-AKI by 20% (ePRISM Acute Kidney Injury Model with Contrast Sensitivities and Dialysis Risk software from Health Outcomes Sciences)
  2. Patient weight and left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) based intravenous crystalloid fluid recommendation.
Other: Control
Usual care.
Other: Control
Usual procedural care provided by cardiologist without introduction of the computerized clinical decision support information.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: Within 4 days after procedure
>26 micromol/L or 50% increase in serum creatinine
Within 4 days after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-Procedural Hospital Bed Days
Time Frame: Thirty days after procedure
Number of days in hospital including length of stay plus readmissions up to 30 days after procedure
Thirty days after procedure
Death
Time Frame: One year after procedure
Total mortality
One year after procedure
Change in eGFR
Time Frame: One year after procedure
Change in eGFR at one year fro pre-procedural baseline (estimated using CKD-EPI equation)
One year after procedure
Cardiac Events
Time Frame: One year after procedure
Hospital admission for angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or unplanned revascularization procedure (excluding staged procedures)
One year after procedure
Kidney Events
Time Frame: On year after procedure
Hospital admission for acute kidney injury or dialysis
On year after procedure
End-stage Kidney Disease
Time Frame: One year after procedure
Kidney failure requiring dialysis, kidney transplantation, or conservative management of kidney failure with eGFR<15 mL/min/1.73m2
One year after procedure
Generic Quality of Life
Time Frame: One year after procedure
EQ-5D
One year after procedure
Cardiovascular-specific quality of life
Time Frame: One year after procedure
Seattle Angina Questionnaire
One year after procedure
Contrast Volume
Time Frame: Day of procedure
Volume of contrast used for each case
Day of procedure
Intravenous Fluid
Time Frame: Day of procedure
Volume of intravenous fluids used for each case
Day of procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total direct health care costs
Time Frame: One year after procedure
Total direct health care costs
One year after procedure
Cost per quality-adjusted life year
Time Frame: One year after procedure
Total direct health care costs per quality adjusted life year
One year after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Calgary

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Alberta Health services
University of Alberta
Alberta Innovates Health Solutions

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Matthew T James, MD PhD, University of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REB17-0039

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to Alberta privacy regulations, unable to share data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings