IS'ECHO : Impact of Bursitis on the Efficacy of Subacromial Steroid Injection in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy (IS'ECHO)

September 10, 2021 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Is the Presence of Subacromial Bursitis Associated With a Good Response to Ultrasound-guided Steroid Injection in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy?

Shoulder pain is a common reason for medical consultation affecting 6.7 % of the adults from 50 to 70 years old and until 21 % of the adults over 70. Among these painful shoulders, rotator cuff tendinopathy represents 44 to 65% of these consultations. To treat this condition, patients usually receive analgesics and physical therapy. When these treatments are not effective, a corticosteroid sub-acromial injection is proposed. However, according to the literature, there is only about 50% of good response to this subacromial injection in rotator cuff tendinopathy. It has been suggested that the injection could be more effective in the presence of an inflammation over the tendons called bursitis. However, no studies have clearly established this. The objective of the study is to determine if the presence of a bursitis could be a factor of good response to corticosteroid injection. The results could allow us to determine which patients have the best profile to respond to subacromial injection. The investigators hope that these data would improve the treatment of this frequent disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients referred to receive a subacromial ultrasound-guided injection for shoulder pain related to a rotator cuff tendinopathy will be enrolled in the study. After validation of the inclusion criteria, the participants will receive oral information about the protocol. Then, they will be examined and will undergo X-rays and an ultrasound of their shoulder. Pain shoulder and shoulder disability will be assessed before the injection with a visual analogic pain scale and the Oxford Shoulder Score questionnaire, respectively.

The subacromial injection will be performed under ultrasound guidance to accurately inject the subacromial bursae. After skin disinfection with povidone, the injection will be performed with a 21G needle. The bursae will be injected with 2 ml of lidocaine 2% and 1 ml of betamethasone.

After the procedure, the participants will all receive a standardized physiotherapy.

For primary outcome, the therapeutic response will be assessed 3 months after the procedure. Patients will be considered as having a good response if their level of pain decreases by over 30%.

The number of participants having a good clinical response will be compared between the patients presenting a bursitis and those without bursitis. The comparison will be made using a Chi-2 test.

Others parameters will be studied: reduction in pain 6 weeks after the injection, reduction in shoulder disability 6 weeks and 3 months after the injection. Other ultrasound lesions will be collected so as X-ray features to search other factors associated with the presence or absence of a good therapeutic response (details in secondary outcomes).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who will receive a subacromial ultrasound-guided injection for shoulder pain related to a rotator cuff tendinopathy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patients with manifestations of rotator cuff tendinopathy referred to our rheumatology department to receive an ultrasound-guided subacromial injection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients refusing to participate
  • Allergic to local anesthetics
  • Shoulder involvement of an inflammatory rheumatic disease
  • History of shoulder surgery
  • Shoulder instability
  • Glenohumeral osteoarthritis
  • Frozen shoulder
  • Extended rotator cuff tear
  • Tendinous calcification > 0.5 cm
  • Pregnant women
  • Minors
  • Majors under guardianship
  • Patient inappropriate for entry into this study according to the judgment of the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in shoulder pain 3 months after the subacromial corticosteroid injection
Time Frame: 3 months

The primary outcome is the presence of a therapeutic response 3 months after the intervention. The level of pain will be assessed by a visual analogic pain scale of 0 (absence of pain) to 10 centimeters (maximal pain).

Participants will be considered as good responders if their level of pain decreases more than 30 percent.

Safety issue: No
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in shoulder pain 6 weeks after the subacromial steroid injection.
Time Frame: 6 weeks after the intervention
Presence of a therapeutic response 6 weeks after the intervention considering the reduction in pain between day 0 and Week 6 and assessed with the same scale as the primary outcome. Participants will be considered as good responders if their level of pain decreases more than 30 percent.
6 weeks after the intervention
Reduction in OSS score (Oxford Shoulder Score) 6 weeks and 3 months after the injection
Time Frame: data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3
The OSS is a 12-item shoulder-specific questionnaire that was developed, with patients, for the assessment of shoulder pain and function. Items refer to the past 4 weeks and each offers five ordinal response options. These were scored from 1 to 5 (5 = most severe) and then conbined to produce a single score with a range from 12 (least difficulties) to 60 (most difficulties).
data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3
Presence of other ultrasound lesions associated with a good response to steroid injection
Time Frame: data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3

The ultrasound lesions collected just before the injection will be :

  • Bursitis: the bursitis is defined by a thickening of more than 2 mm of the subacromial bursae.
  • Tendinous lesions (supra-spinatus, infra-spinatus or sub-scapularis): tendon thickening, hypoechoic density, presence of microcalcification, partial or complete tear
  • Effusion of long head of biceps tendon sheath
  • Acromio-clavicular joint lesions = synovitis, presence of Doppler flow, osteophytes
data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3
Presence of radiographic abnormalities associated with a good response.
Time Frame: data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3
X-ray data = Acromion Morphology according to Park's classification, Critical Shoulder Angle, acromioclavicular osteoarthritis
data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3
Steroid injection safety
Time Frame: data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3
Adverse events will be collected after the procedure and during follow-up.
data from Day 0, Week 6 and Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nantes University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christelle Darrieutort-Laffite, CHU de Nantes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 10, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC17_0496

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Clinical Trials on Infiltration

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings