Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Tendon Stem Progenitor Cells Therapy for Rotator Cuff Tears

Tendon injury is one of the most common sports injuries, including local tissue degeneration at the tendon insertion site following inflammation caused by long-term joint movement, friction, or strain, as well as acute traumatic tendon tears and defects of varying degrees due to sports. It is a recognized therapeutic challenge in orthopedics and sports medicine. With the increase in people's physical activities and changes in work styles, tendon injuries have become increasingly prevalent, with at least 30 million tendon injury cases annually. Meanwhile, tendon injuries pose a significant threat to the careers of many elite athletes. Currently, clinical treatments for tendon injuries mainly remain at the stages of physical therapy, surgical suture, and transplantation. Although these treatments have certain effects, their efficacy is limited-primarily because adult tendons lack complete regenerative capacity. As a result, the quality of repaired tendons is far inferior to that of normal tendons, making them prone to tendon adhesion, poor structural and mechanical properties, and frequent re-rupture. Even autologous tendon transplantation can only achieve approximately 40% of the mechanical properties of normal tendons, accompanied by excessive scar tissue formation. Current therapeutic and tissue engineering approaches can only partially improve tendon repair quality, failing to induce complete tendon repair and regeneration. Therefore, exploring new and efficient strategies for the treatment and regeneration of tendon injuries is of great significance.

In recent years, cell therapy has brought new opportunities for improving the repair quality of soft tissues such as tendons. Tendon-derived cells are isolated and extracted from tendons. These cells not only possess stem cell characteristics similar to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells but also highly express tendon-specific genes and proteins. Therefore, this study intends to first culture and expand tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs) to form therapeutic agents, then apply TSPC-enhanced therapy intraoperatively to patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy, and evaluate its clinical safety and efficacy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

107

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged between 18 and 70 years, regardless of gender;
  2. Tear size classified as small (< 1 cm) or medium-sized (1 cm to 3 cm) according to the DeOrio and Cofield classification system;
  3. Persistent shoulder pain or functional limitations despite at least 3 months of non-surgical treatment, with indications for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair;
  4. Willing to sign the informed consent form and agree to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tear size classified as large (3 cm to 5 cm) or massive (> 5 cm) according to the DeOrio and Cofield classification, or Patte grade 3 tendon retraction;
  2. Subscapularis tendon tear;
  3. Complicated with anterior, posterior, or multidirectional shoulder joint instability;
  4. Indications for repair of anterior or posterior labral injury;
  5. Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroids within 3 months prior to the planned surgery;
  6. Comorbidities that contraindicate arthroscopic shoulder surgery;
  7. Local (shoulder, abdomen, buttocks) or systemic infection, osteomyelitis, or sepsis;
  8. Diabetes mellitus, untreated thyroid disease, chronic kidney disease, or rheumatoid arthritis;
  9. Immunodeficiency;
  10. Chronic diseases involving coagulation or platelet aggregation, or severe coagulopathy;
  11. Severe cardiovascular disease;
  12. Stroke or acute cardiovascular event within 6 months prior to the planned surgery;
  13. Weight loss > 30 kg for any reason within 12 months, or unexplained weight loss > 10 kg within 12 months;
  14. Eating disorder or body dysmorphic disorder;
  15. Alcohol/drug addiction or mental illness that may affect compliance with postoperative protocols;
  16. Pregnant or lactating women;
  17. Refusal to sign the informed consent form;
  18. Other conditions deemed inappropriate by the investigators.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional surgery group
All procedures were performed under general anesthesia, including subacromial decompression, acromioplasty, and rotator cuff repair using a double-row suture bridge technique.
All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Patients were in a beach-chair position. After glenohumeral inspection, subacromial decompression was conducted, and acromioplasty was performed. After subacromial decompression, the upper surface of the greater tuberosity was abraded to create a bleeding cancellous bone bed. The footprint of the greater tuberosity was debrided. Rotator cuff repair was performed using a double-row suture bridge technique. For medial-row repair, a hole was punched in the greater tuberosity, and a bioabsorbable suture anchor was inserted. After the medial row was completed, the suture limbs were used to create suture bridges over the tendon. The lateral fixation points were placed, and the suture anchor was used for lateral-row fixation.
Experimental: TSPCs enhanced group
For patients in the TSPCs group, after removing the arthroscopic fluid, TSPCs mixed with fibrin glue were applied to the tendon-bone junction and repaired tendon surface under arthroscopic guidance.
All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Patients were in a beach-chair position. After glenohumeral inspection, subacromial decompression was conducted, and acromioplasty was performed. After subacromial decompression, the upper surface of the greater tuberosity was abraded to create a bleeding cancellous bone bed. The footprint of the greater tuberosity was debrided. Rotator cuff repair was performed using a double-row suture bridge technique. For medial-row repair, a hole was punched in the greater tuberosity, and a bioabsorbable suture anchor was inserted. After the medial row was completed, the suture limbs were used to create suture bridges over the tendon. The lateral fixation points were placed, and the suture anchor was used for lateral-row fixation.
For patients in the TSPCs group, after removing the arthroscopic fluid, the prepared TSPCs loaded on a scaffold were injected into the tendon - bone junction and over the repaired tendon using a spinal needle. Fibrin glue (Fibrin Sealant (Human), RAAS) served as the scaffold. The TSPCs suspension was first mixed with thrombin solution at a 3:1 ratio. Then, using the DUPLOJECT syringe support system (Fibrin Sealant (Human), RAAS), 2 ml of cell - thrombin suspension was combined with 2 ml of fibrinogen solution at a 1:1 ratio and applied to the repaired tendon surface. After extracting the arthroscopic fluid, this cell - thrombin - fibrinogen suspension was implanted under arthroscopic guidance. A probe was used to spread and adjust the fibrin glue to cover the repaired tendon - bone junction and tendon surface.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase I:Incidence and severity of cell therapy related adverse events
Time Frame: In 12 weeks
Incidence and severity of cell therapy related adverse events:Adverse events are defined as abnormal laboratory test results, symptoms or signs, and are graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Serious adverse events are defined as any grade 3 or 4 adverse events as specified in the CTCAE.
In 12 weeks
Phase II:Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
OSS is a patient-reported measure used to assess functional limitations following shoulder surgery. It consists of 12 items, each with five response categories, and scores can range from 0 (indicating the worst functional status) to 48 (indicating the best functional status).
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant-Murley Score (CMS)
Time Frame: Baseline,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
The CMS provides an assessment of both Individual parameters and clinical symptoms, which is sufficiently sensitive to reveal even small changes in function. The score consists of four domains : pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), movement (40 points), and strength (25 points).
Baseline,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Baseline,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
The examiner passively moved the patient's upper extremity to the end range of flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation, ensuring movements were within the patient's comfort level. Internal and external rotation were measured at 90° of abduction.
Baseline,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
Shoulder pain at rest
Time Frame: Baseline,Post-op Week 1,Post-op Week 4,Post-op Week 8,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
A Numerical Rating Scale from 0 to 10 with "0" representing no pain and "10" representing the worst pain imaginable in the preceding week.
Baseline,Post-op Week 1,Post-op Week 4,Post-op Week 8,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
Work status
Time Frame: Baseline,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
Normal duties, restricted duties/hours, not working.
Baseline,Post-op Week 12,Post-op Week 24,Post-op Week 48
Tendon Integrity Classification on MRI
Time Frame: Post-op Week 24, Post-op Week 48
According to SUGAYA Classification.
Post-op Week 24, Post-op Week 48
Muscle wasting of rotator cuff on MRI
Time Frame: Baseline, Post-op Week 24, Post-op Week 48
Measured using Goutallier classification (Stages 0-4).
Baseline, Post-op Week 24, Post-op Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-1814

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Clinical Trials on Conventional rotator cuff repair.

Subscribe