Effect of Intravenous Nalbuphine on Emergence Agitation

September 1, 2021 updated by: Mohamed abdelhameed, Assiut University

Effect of Intravenous Nalbuphine on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Repair of Rupture Globe

Our primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of administration of single dose of intravenous nalbuphine given with induction of anesthesia with intravenous nalbuphine given at the end of surgery on the incidence and severity of EA in children undergoing repair of rupture globe under general anesthesia.

The secondary outcomes will include FLACC score for postoperative pain assessment, hemodynamic variables, any complications as postoperative vomiting (POV) and sedation and parents' satisfaction score.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Postoperative agitation, also referred to as emergence delirium is characterized by mental confusion, irritability, disorientation, inconsolable crying, and increased recovery time in the post anesthesia recovery room, increasing parents' concern and anxiety with respect to the clinical condition of their children . It can also lead to possible injury, damage to surgical dressings, lost intravenous catheters, disconnected cables and monitoring instruments, and source of dissatisfaction for parents, nurses, and others taking care of these children, and hence the children require extra nursing care and supplemental sedative and/or analgesic medications, which may delay patient discharge from hospital and are seven times more likely to have new-onset separation anxiety, apathy, and eating and sleep problems.

It is during the first 30 minutes after emergence that the greatest incidence of agitation is observed, and duration is generally limited and recovery occurs spontaneously. However, prolonged episodes of agitation lasting for up to 2 days have been described.

There is no definitive explanation for emergence agitation (EA). Many different causes have been suggested, such as rapid return of consciousness in an unfamiliar environment, the presence of pain (wounds, sore throat, and bladder distension), stressful induction, airway obstruction, a noisy environment, the duration of anesthesia, the child's personality, anesthetic premedication and the anesthetic technique used.

While its pathogenesis remains unclear, previous studies reported that ENT (ear, nose, and throat) surgical procedures have a higher incidence of EA in both adults and children . Children undergoing strabismus surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia often experience EA and postoperative vomiting (POV) .

Multiple medications including ketamine, propofol, clonidine, midazolam and fentanyl have been used effectively to prevent EA. However, these medications may increase sedation after anesthesia, cause slow awakening, and in some cases are associated with undesirable side effects, such as nausea and vomiting.

Nalbuphine is a synthetic opioid κ-receptor agonist μ-receptor antagonist with onset of action occurring within 2-3 min following IV injection, duration of analgesia of 3-6 hours and plasma half-life of 5 hours. Its analgesic potency approximately equals to morphine with less effects on cardiovascular and respiratory system, i.e., nalbuphine causes less intensive and less frequent decrease in blood pressure and respiratory depression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Assiut, Egypt, 71515
        • Assiut University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 8 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 3-8 years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II scheduled to undergo repair of rupture globe.
  • Gender: both.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent refusal.
  • History of developmental delay or mental retardation.
  • Known hypersensitivity to any drug used in this study.
  • Children with co-morbid conditions like congenital heart disease, respiratory pathology and central nervous system disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Group A
40 randomly allocated Patients undergoing repair of rupture globe will receive IV nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg with induction of anesthesia.
Drug: IV nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg with induction of anesthesia.

Group A: 40 patients will receive IV nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg with induction of anesthesia.

.

Other Names:
  • nalufin
EXPERIMENTAL: Group B
40 randomly allocated Patients undergoing repair of rupture globe.will receive IV nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg at the end of surgery just before discontinuation of anesthesia.
Drug: IV nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg at the end of surgery.
Group B: 40 patients will receive IV nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg at the end of surgery just before discontinuation of anesthesia.
Other Names:
  • nalufin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of Emergence Agitation in children undergoing repair of rupture globe under general anesthesia
Time Frame: at the first 30 minutes after surgery

the Incidence of Emergence Agitation will be evaluated using Aono's four-point scale.

  • minimum score: 1

  • maximum score:4 Scores of one and two were considered as absence of EA, and scores of 3 and 4 were analyzed as presence of Emergence Agitation.

    1. Calm
    2. Not calm, but could be easily calmed
    3. Moderately agitated or restless
    4. Combative, excited, disoriente
at the first 30 minutes after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The severity of Emergency Agitation
Time Frame: at the first 30 minutes after surgery
5- The severity of EA will be evaluated using the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale A perfectly calm child scores 0 and extreme agitation corresponds to 20 points Agitation scores less than 10 will be interpreted as an absence of agitation, scores ≥ 10 will be regarded as presence of agitation, and scores ≥15 will be regarded as severe agitation
at the first 30 minutes after surgery
postoperative vomiting
Time Frame: first 48 hours after surgery

Postoperative vomiting will be assessed using a numeric rank score

  • minimum score: 0
  • maximum score: 2 higher values represent a worse outcome and lowest values represent a better outcome 0 = no vomiting, 1 = vomited once, and 2 = vomited twice or more.
first 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative sedation
Time Frame: first 48 hours after surgery

Postoperative sedation will be assessed using sedation score described by Culebras et al (2001)

  • minimum score: 1
  • maximum score: 5 higher values represent a worse outcome and lowest values represent a better outcome 1. Awake and alert. 2. Sleeping but easily arouses to voice or light touch. 3. Arouses to loud voice or shaking. 4. Arouses with painful stimuli only. 5. Unarousable).
first 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative FLACC Pain Score
Time Frame: first 24 hours after surgery
Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) pain score
first 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Hamdy Abbas, Professor, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 31, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • postoperative EA in children

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on IV nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg with induction of anesthesia.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings