Open Versus Closed Reduction of Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fractures
Comparison of Open Reduction With Internal Fixation and Closed Reduction With External Fixation of Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fractures
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 16-60 years
- Displaced Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures(MCFs) irrespective of multiple mandibular fractures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral MCFs
- MCF with mid-facial fractures
- Insufficient bilateral dentition
- Medically unfit for surgery
- Old healed mandibular fractures
- History of previous mandibular surgery for the same indication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ORIF
Open Reduction & Internal Fixation
|
Patients underwent surgery and the fractures were reduced under direct vision followed by internal fixation with titanium plates and screws
|
|
Active Comparator: CREF
Closed Reduction & External Fixation
|
Patients underwent closed reduction of the fracture and external fixation by arch bars & guided elastics
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Mouth Opening shall be determined by measuring the maximal distance between the edges of upper and lower incisors with fully opened mouth; the measurement shall be made in millimeters (mm) using vernier caliper and mouth opening of 35 mm or more shall be classified as "adequate"
|
6 months
|
|
Occlusion
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Occlusion shall be determined by maximum "inter-cuspation" as observed by the surgeon and patient self-reporting and will be classified as fine or deranged.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The frequency of complications with either mode of treatment shall be recorded
|
6 months
|
|
Cost-Effectiveness
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Cost-Effectiveness shall be determined as the ratio of the cost of treatment and achievement of both adequate mouth opening and fine occlusion. The cost of treatment shall include the cost of surgical items (wires, elastics, arch bars, plates, screws etc), cost of anesthesia and surgery, cost of hospital stay and cost of follow up. |
6 months
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Participants shall be requested to report their satisfaction after treatment with regards to ease of chewing, mouth opening & closing and achievement of pre0traumatic facial symmetry/orientation. This parameter shall be recorded on a 4-point Likert scale (not satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, somewhat satisfied, satisfied). |
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 107/RC/KEMU
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Fractures
-
NCT07385924CompletedMandibular Fracture | Virtual Plan of Mandibular Fracture
-
NCT07590401Completed
-
NCT07263893RecruitingMandibular Fracture Treatment
-
NCT07153354Not yet recruitingMandibular Class Iv Fractures
-
NCT07231042CompletedMandibular Angle Fracture
-
NCT07184762Active, not recruitingMandibular Fracture Treatment
-
NCT07221916CompletedMandible Fracture | Mandibular Reconstruction
-
NCT07319650Not yet recruitingNeurosensory Disturbance | Mandibular Body Fractures
-
NCT06970379CompletedT-prf Versus T-prf and Low-level Laser Stimulation on Bone Healing at Posterior Mandibular FracturesPosterior Mandibular Fractures
-
NCT06167187Recruiting
Clinical Trials on Open Reduction & Internal Fixation
-
NCT03419182CompletedAcetabular Fracture
-
NCT03533634CompletedClosed Fracture of Shaft of Clavicle
-
NCT03084263Withdrawn
-
NCT03009890CompletedRadius Distal Fracture
-
NCT02784678Unknown
-
NCT03264196CompletedCondylar Process of Mandible Open Fracture
-
NCT06403124CompletedPosterior Wall of Acetabulum Fracture
-
NCT02245893UnknownFracture Dislocation of Ankle Joint
-
NCT05573516RecruitingA Comparative Study Between Positional and Lag Screws for the Fixation of Medial Malleolar FracturesAnkle Fractures | Medial Malleolus Fracture