Arthroscopic Assisted Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation in Ankle Fractures

May 23, 2017 updated by: Spectrum Health Hospitals

A Comparison Study of Arthroscopic Assisted Open Reduction Internal Fixation (AORIF) Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) in Ankle Fractures: Does AORIF Improve Functional Outcomes?

The objective of this study is to compare the functional outcomes of patients with ankle fractures treated by Arthroscopic assisted Open Reduction Internal Fixation (AORIF) versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial evaluating patients with ankle fractures undergoing AORIF versus ORIF

Participants will be randomized into 2 different surgical groups, one group receiving only ORIF and the other group receiving AORIF.

As standard of care patients will follow up in the office at approximately 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post operatively. Patients will be immobilized in a splint and will be non-weight bearing until their 3 week post-op visit. At the 3 week post-op visit, the patient will be fitted in a boot, be instructed to begin self-directed ROM and to continue non-weight bearing. At the 6 week post-op visit, the patient will begin weight bearing in the boot.

In office study visit will occur at these same times. At each visit weight bearing status, return to sports, pain level, AOFAS and FAAM will be assessed. One additional study visit will be conducted over the phone or by mail at approximately one year post operatively and will consist of the FAAM.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Spectrum Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Closed ankle fractures (44A, 44B, 44C)
  • Ages of 18-65
  • Men or women, including pregnant women
  • Willing to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fractures
  • Other lower extremity injuries/conditions that affects functional outcomes
  • Problems maintaining follow up (homeless, not willing to return for follow up)
  • Prisoners
  • Unable to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AORIF of Ankle Fractures
Arthroscopic Assisted Open Reduction Internal Fixation of ankle fracture.
Surgical fixation of ankle fractures with use of arthroscopy.
Other Names:
  • AORIF
Active Comparator: ORIF of Ankle Fractures
Open Reduction Internal Fixation of ankle fracture.
Surgical fixation of ankle fractures.
Other Names:
  • ORIF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)
Time Frame: 6 month
Compare AOFAS scores between AORIF versus ORIF of ankle fractures.
6 month
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare FAAM scores between AORIF versus ORIF of ankle fractures.
1 year
Rate of Return to Sports
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare Return to Sports rates between AORIF versus ORIF of ankle fractures.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of Complications
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare rates of Complication between AORIF versus ORIF of ankle fractures.
1 year
Pain Scores
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare Pain Scores between AORIF versus ORIF of ankle fractures.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Anderson, MD, Spectrum Health Hospitals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-061

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures

Clinical Trials on Arthroscopic Assisted Open Reduction Internal Fixation

3
Subscribe