Retropubic vs. Single-Incision Mid-Urethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

January 14, 2025 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Randomized Trial of Retropubic Versus Single-incision Mid-Urethral Sling (Altis ) for Concomitant Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence During Native Tissue Vaginal Repair

One in five women will undergo prolapse surgery in their lifetime, and there is a strong correlation between prolapse and urinary incontinence. Pelvic floor surgeons aspire to improve relevant quality of life outcomes for women with pelvic floor disorders while minimizing complications and unnecessary procedures. There has been an experience of disappointment and frustration when a patient returns following POP repair with new symptoms of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) that she ranks as a greater disruption to her quality of life than her original vaginal bulge. While retropubic (RP) slings are considered to be the "gold-standard" referent for other slings with long-term outcomes data, they are associated with the highest risks of intra- and post-operative complications including bladder injury, bleeding, and post-operative voiding dysfunction. Single-incision slings (SIS) are the latest iteration in sling development that build upon the benefits of slings but avoid passage through the muscles of the inner thigh. The hypothesis for this study is that single-incision slings (Altis) are non-inferior to Retropubic mid-urethral slings when placed at the time of native tissue vaginal repair.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pelvic floor surgeons aspire to improve relevant quality of life outcomes for women with pelvic floor disorders while minimizing complications and unnecessary procedures. Efficacy and risk always compete for equilibrium. Level I evidence has demonstrated a positive efficacy benefit of a concomitant synthetic mid-urethral sling in women with, and without, pre-operative symptoms of SUI who are undergoing POP repair. Concomitant sling placement has been shown to reduce the risk of de novo or persistent SUI from 50% to 23%. The combination of surgical treatment of POP and SUI at the same time, however, increases the risk of incomplete bladder emptying. While retropubic (RP) slings are considered to be the "gold-standard" referent for other slings with long-term outcomes data, they are associated with the highest risks of intra- and post-operative complications including bladder injury, bleeding, and post-operative voiding dysfunction. Single-incision slings (SIS) are the latest iteration in sling development that build upon the benefits of slings but avoid passage through the muscles of the inner thigh. As the combination of POP and sling surgery increases the risk of voiding dysfunction, and rates of incomplete bladder emptying appear significantly lower for SIS than RP slings, the study team hypothesizes that the use of the Single-incision Mid-Urethral Sling SIS will be non-inferior to RP slings in efficacy and superior in irritative voiding symptoms/voiding dysfunction at one year after combined surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
280

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • MedStar Health/National Center for Advance Pelvic Surgery
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Medical Group
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • Northwell Health
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 21 years of age
  • Women being considered for a native tissue vaginal repair in any vaginal compartment or colpocleisis
  • POP ≥ stage II of any vaginal compartment, according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system
  • Vaginal bulge symptoms
  • Positive standardized cough stress test on clinical examination, or on urodynamic testing
  • Surgical plan that includes a native tissue vaginal repair including colpocleisis for symptomatic POP in any compartment
  • Understanding and acceptance of the need to return for all scheduled follow-up visits
  • English speaking and able to give informed consent
  • Willing and able to complete all study questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence
  • Status post reconstructive pelvic surgery with transvaginal mesh kits or sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh for prolapse
  • Any serious disease, or chronic condition, that could interfere with the study compliance
  • Unwilling to have a synthetic sling
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Pregnancy or planning pregnancy in the first postoperative year
  • Untreated urinary tract infection (may be included after resolution)
  • Poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus (HgbA1c > 9 within 3 months of surgery date)
  • Prior pelvic radiation
  • Incarcerated
  • Neurogenic bladder/ pre-operative self-catheterization
  • Elevated post-void residual (>150 ml) that does not resolve with prolapse reduction testing (pessary, prolapse reduced uroflow or micturition study)
  • Prior augmented (synthetic mesh, autologous graft, xenograft, allograft) prolapse repair
  • Planned concomitant bowel related surgery including sphincteroplasty and perineal rectal prolapse surgery, rectovaginal fistula repair, hemorrhoidectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: RP sling group
Participants assigned to the retropubic (RP) sling group will have the RP sling placement procedure.
Device: RP sling placement
A 1.5 cm incision will be made at the mid-urethra through a separate vaginal incision with lateral dissection with Metzembaum scissors. After placement of both trocars, cystoscopy with a 70-degree scope will be performed to assess for bladder and urethral injury. Surgeons will set the tension of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) slings so that a spacer can be placed between the sling and the urethra. Sling tensioning will be performed after anterior and apical prolapse is corrected.
Experimental: SIS group
Participants assigned to the single-incision sling (SIS) group will have the SIS placement procedure.
Device: SIS placement
The sling is introduced through a single anterior vaginal incision of 1.5 cm at the mid-urethra. The sling/needle assembly is advanced behind the ischiopubic rami in a transobturator trajectory toward the obturator space bilaterally. The needle is then removed by simply sliding the fixating tip back out. The other side is then completed in an identical fashion. After the fixation of the two anchors at the 2 and 10 o'clock positions, the patient's bladder is filled with 250 mL of Sodium Chloride (NaCl). Afterward, an intraoperative crede maneuver is performed and the tension adjustment suture is pulled, when necessary, to achieve the desired continence. The mesh will lie in direct apposition to the urethra. The adjustment thread is then cut short and the vaginal incision is closed with an absorbable suture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Subjectively Bothersome Stress Incontinence
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
Dichotomous outcome (Yes/No), measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit
12 months post-operatively
Count of Participants Needing Retreatment for Stress Incontinence
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
This includes pelvic floor physical therapy; incontinence pessary; urethral bulking injection; repeat incontinence surgery.
12 months post-operatively
Count of Participants With De Novo or Worsening Urge Incontinence Symptoms
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
Dichotomous outcome (Yes/No), measured by a worsening change in response to Question 16 on PFDI-20 with at least somewhat bothersome symptoms. Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit
12 months post-operatively
Count of Participants Requiring Bladder Drainage
Time Frame: 12 Month post-operatively
Beyond 2 weeks post-operatively with PVR > 150 ml OR > 1/3 total voided volume up to 12 Month post-operatively..
12 Month post-operatively
Count of Participants Needing Surgical Intervention for Urinary Retention
Time Frame: 12 Month post-operatively
Sling lysis or revision at any time point post-operatively up to 12 Month post-operatively.
12 Month post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
Reporting of adverse events intra- and post-operatively and include adverse events as measured by the Dindo classification system.
12 months post-operatively
Surgeon Satisfaction Scores
Time Frame: post-operatively up to 12 months
Surgeon satisfaction with the sling will be assessed with a 10-point Likert Scale. The scale has a score range of 0-10, with 0=no satisfaction 10=extremely satisfied.
post-operatively up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Foundation for Female Health Awareness

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Catherine Matthews, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00050256

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings