Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Treatment of Refractory Graft Versus Host Disease-a Pilot Study

March 22, 2019 updated by: Cao Qing, Shanghai Children's Medical Center
The study evaluates safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of refractory graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) of the gut. FMT might be a beneficial treatment in this clinical situation with a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) is a major complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Gut is the most vulnerable target organ of acute GVHD. Patients who have a gastrointestinal acute GVHD received a first-line standard treatment of corticosteroids. For patients who do not respond or progress after an initial response have a high mortality. Therefore, the investigation of effective second line therapy for these patients are in need. The study evaluates safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of refractory GVHD of the gut. FMT might be a beneficial treatment in this clinical situation with a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 3-18 years of age
  • Allo-SCT patients with acute steroid-resistant GI-related GVHD grade III-IV. Steroid-resistant GI-related GVHD will be defined as lack of improvement (same stage) or worsening of GI symptoms after 7 days of steroid therapy (≥ 2 ml/kg of IV methylprednisolone)
  • No definite contraindication for gastrointestinal endoscopy
  • Signature of informed consent by the legal guardians of patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior inclusion to an interventional study
  • Previous Allo-SCT
  • Known multi-drug resistance carriage prior to stool collection
  • Severe colitis of any etiology or a history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
  • Uncontrolled infection (hemodynamic instability, ongoing high fever or bacteremia within 3 days after antibiotics administration)
  • Active GI bleeding
  • Absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/microL
  • Absolute platelet count< 10 x 109 /L
  • Patients who cannot give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: HSCT patients with refractory GVHD
Patients will accept FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) panel test before pre-treatment of HSCT and 28±3 days post-HSCT. Patients will receive 50ml fecal microbiota from unrelated healthy donors through nasojejunal tube and monitored under gastroscopy. Patients receiving FMT treatment will be followed for at least 6 months. The ideal follow up time is 2 year. Stool and blood samples will be serially collected and tested (before pre-treatment, 1/3/6/12 months after FMT).
Biological: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
For patients who do not respond or partial respond for first time FMT treatment, a second time FMT treatment using different donor should be considered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of FMT in the treatment of refractory GVHD on day 7
Time Frame: 7 days following FMT
Participants will be evaluated on days 7 following FMT. The volume and frequency of daily diarrhoea will be continuous observed and recorded in 7 days.
7 days following FMT
Efficacy of FMT in the treatment of refractory GVHD on day 28
Time Frame: 28 days following FMT
Participants will be evaluated on days 28 following FMT. The volume and frequency of daily diarrhoea will be continuous observed and recorded in 28 days.
28 days following FMT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment-related AEs and SAEs
Time Frame: up to 28 days following FMT
The overall safety of the study will be evaluated with the incidence of all Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) within 28 days following FMT. The relationship of any kind AEs and FMT will be seriously evaluated. Non-serious AEs include: dyspepsia, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, fever, inhalation without mechanical ventilation, etc. SAEs include: death, sepsis, aspiration pneumonia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, septic shock, etc.
up to 28 days following FMT
GVHD severity
Time Frame: up to 28 days following FMT
Patients will be evaluated on days 7 and 28 following transplantation for severity of GVHD. GVHD severity is graded by the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Severity Index grading system.
up to 28 days following FMT
Implantation rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
The data will be compared with patients who had not participated in clinical trials.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Survival rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
The data will be compared with patients who had not participated in clinical trials.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change in biomarkers
Time Frame: up to 28 days following FMT
Change in levels of albumin and C-reactive protein between days 0 and days 28 will serve as a secondary endpoint.
up to 28 days following FMT
Number of patients with infectious disorders
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluation of FMT activity on infectious disorder.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Quality of Life
Time Frame: up to 6 months following FMT
The quality of life of patients will be measured using a standardized quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) prior to transplantation and on days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 180 following transplantation.
up to 6 months following FMT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Children's Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Qing Cao, MD, Shanghai Children's Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FMT-GVHD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings