The Effect of an Intervention Based on Implicit Theories of Personality on the Prevention of Adolescent Dating Violence
Prevention of Aggressive Behavior in Adolescents by Means of an Intervention Based on Implicit Theories of Personality
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed consent by the adolescents and their parents.
- To be fluent in Spanish.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Incremental theory of personality
1 hour behavioral intervention (based on ITP) consisting on several tasks to be completed on paper individually.
|
The experimental intervention (originally developed by David S. Yeager and colleagues) teaches that individuals have the potential to change.
It has three main parts.
First, participants are asked to read scientific studies that provide evidence that behaviors are controlled by "thoughts and feelings in brains," and that pathways in the brain have the potential to be changed under the right circumstances.
Second, participants read several testimonials purportedly written by upperclassmen to bring credibility to the ITP.
Finally, participants are asked to write their own version of such a narrative.
This self-persuasive writing exercise has been shown to facilitate the internalization of the intervention message, building on a long line of research on cognitive dissonance.
|
|
Other: Educational intervention
1 hour educational intervention (about the human brain) consisting on several tasks to be completed on paper individually.
|
The educational intervention involved scientific information about the human brain.
It was designed to be parallel to the experimental intervention and, hence, it has also three main parts.
First, participants are asked to read scientific information about the different areas of the brain and their specialties.
Second, participants read several testimonials written by upperclassmen about their transition to high school and how their brains help them to adapt to the new space and all the physical differences of the building and the classes.
Finally, participants are asked to write a letter to another student explaining the main things he or she has learned about the brain and thinks are important for adapting to the new physical environment in high school.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline scores of the Dating Violence Questionaire (developed by the research team) at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.
|
Self reported dating aggressive behaviors during the last 6 months (last week in the 1 week follow-up) measured by 25 items scored 0-3 (0 = never; 3 = often), yielding a total between 0 and 75.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Affection and Communication subscale of the Parenting Style Scale (Oliva, Parra, Sanchez-Queija, & López, 2007) for parents.
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months.
|
8 items reported by the adolescents' parents from the affection and communication subscale, which assesses support and care delivered by the parents, their ability to be there, and the communication between them.
Each item is scored 1-6 (1= not at all true to 6=completely true), yielding a total between 8 and 48.
|
Baseline and 6 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Esther Calvete, PhD, University of Deusto
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI_2016_1_0023
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.