Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion With Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication

November 19, 2021 updated by: Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Early Intervention for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion: Randomized Controlled Trial for Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication

This study aims to standardize the treatment of pleural space (parapneumonic) infections by comparing the difference in outcomes between 2 methods of treatment: early VATS (Video Assisted Thorascopic Surgery) decortication versus fibrinolytic therapy. During treatment, the patient's coagulopathy status will also be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The treatment of parapneumonic infections (infection in the pleural space) at the Denver Health Medical Center is not standardized, and timing for advanced interventions such as fibrinolytic therapy or surgical decortication remain unclear. The definitive treatment strategy in these patients may be sub-optimal, and lead to prolonged hospitalization and morbidity. This is concerning as the mortality rate of community acquired pneumonia triples in the presence of a parapneumonic process (5-15%) and can reach over 25% if it becomes bilateral(1). Prompt recognition of pleural space infections is essential for reducing morbidity and mortality. This is attributable to the progression of the disease from a simple fluid collection amenable to pleural space drainage, to necrotizing empyema requiring thoracotomy decortication and open drainage. The keys to management of parapneumonic effusions are early diagnosis, appropriate therapeutic intervention, and recognition of failure of conservative management. The investigators propose that a standardized pathway for identifying and treating parapneumonic effusions will be an important quality improvement. A key gap in the literature remains if patients with parapneumonic infections that cannot be drained with a chest tube should undergo a trial in intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, or if they should go directly to video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for decortication of all infectious material.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old and older
  • Admitted with pleural effusion that undergoes thoracentesis by medical/pulmonary service
  • Pleural fluid pH <7.3
  • SICU placed chest tube
  • Subsequent transfer to SICU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing malignancy
  • Malignant cells from initial pleural fluid sample
  • End stage liver disease (Child's B or greater)
  • Coagulopathy
  • Unable to tolerate surgical procedure
  • Frank purulent drainage (needs OR regardless)
  • Recent surgery of abdomen or thorax precluding the use of tPA
  • Baseline neurologic impairment requiring a proxy for consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Operative VATS decortication
Operative group that will undergo early VATS decortication of complicated parapneumonic effusion/empyema
Procedure: VATS Decortication
Surgical procedure to unroof all located collections of the pleural space through a chest wall incision
Active Comparator: Non-operative Fibrinolytic Therapy
Non-operative group that will undergo instillation of the drugs DNAse and tPA (tissue plasminogen activator) together i.e. 5mg DNAse and 10mg tPA twice a day for up to six doses, through chest tube as treatment of the patient's complicated parapneumonic effusion/empyema. Fibrinolytic therapy = DNAse + tPA; these medications are not mutually exclusive.
Drug: Fibrinolytic Therapy
Instillation of DNAse and tPA together through patient's chest tube already in placed to break down complex fluid collection in the pleural space. DNAse and tPA are are administered together only i.e. are not mutually exclusive.
Other Names:
  • DNAse / tPA combination therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: From patient's admission to hospital to their discharge, (excluding extended stay due to social work reasons) up to 28 days or discharge, which ever comes first.
How long the patient remains admitted in the hospital during their index hospitalization
From patient's admission to hospital to their discharge, (excluding extended stay due to social work reasons) up to 28 days or discharge, which ever comes first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU Free Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Admission days during index hospitalization that are of a lower acuity of care than intensive care
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Chest Tube Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Days with chest tube in place after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Cost of Admission and Treatment
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Cost of care for the patient after their intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Pain Score
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
What the patient's level of pain is from 0 to 10; zero being no pain, 10 being the worst pain imaginable. score is categorical 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 or 10.
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Chest Tube Drainage
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount and character of the drainage from the chest tube after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Incentive Spirometry
Time Frame: Everyday for 5 days post study intervention, from admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
To what volume the patient can inspire using an incentive spirometer
Everyday for 5 days post study intervention, from admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Supplemental Oxygen Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount of time the patient needs to warn off any supplemental oxygen
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Fever Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount of days it takes to resolve fever (temp >100.4)
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Days of Antibiotics
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The number of days antibiotics are required after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Elevated White Blood Count Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount of days it takes to resolve a leukocytosis
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Changed in Coagulopathic Status
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Changes in laboratory TEG values after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Fredric Pieracci, MD, MPH, Denver Health and Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 2, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17-0857

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings