Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion With Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication

November 19, 2021 updated by: Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Early Intervention for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion: Randomized Controlled Trial for Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication

This study aims to standardize the treatment of pleural space (parapneumonic) infections by comparing the difference in outcomes between 2 methods of treatment: early VATS (Video Assisted Thorascopic Surgery) decortication versus fibrinolytic therapy. During treatment, the patient's coagulopathy status will also be evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The treatment of parapneumonic infections (infection in the pleural space) at the Denver Health Medical Center is not standardized, and timing for advanced interventions such as fibrinolytic therapy or surgical decortication remain unclear. The definitive treatment strategy in these patients may be sub-optimal, and lead to prolonged hospitalization and morbidity. This is concerning as the mortality rate of community acquired pneumonia triples in the presence of a parapneumonic process (5-15%) and can reach over 25% if it becomes bilateral(1). Prompt recognition of pleural space infections is essential for reducing morbidity and mortality. This is attributable to the progression of the disease from a simple fluid collection amenable to pleural space drainage, to necrotizing empyema requiring thoracotomy decortication and open drainage. The keys to management of parapneumonic effusions are early diagnosis, appropriate therapeutic intervention, and recognition of failure of conservative management. The investigators propose that a standardized pathway for identifying and treating parapneumonic effusions will be an important quality improvement. A key gap in the literature remains if patients with parapneumonic infections that cannot be drained with a chest tube should undergo a trial in intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, or if they should go directly to video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for decortication of all infectious material.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old and older
  • Admitted with pleural effusion that undergoes thoracentesis by medical/pulmonary service
  • Pleural fluid pH <7.3
  • SICU placed chest tube
  • Subsequent transfer to SICU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing malignancy
  • Malignant cells from initial pleural fluid sample
  • End stage liver disease (Child's B or greater)
  • Coagulopathy
  • Unable to tolerate surgical procedure
  • Frank purulent drainage (needs OR regardless)
  • Recent surgery of abdomen or thorax precluding the use of tPA
  • Baseline neurologic impairment requiring a proxy for consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Operative VATS decortication
Operative group that will undergo early VATS decortication of complicated parapneumonic effusion/empyema
Surgical procedure to unroof all located collections of the pleural space through a chest wall incision
Active Comparator: Non-operative Fibrinolytic Therapy
Non-operative group that will undergo instillation of the drugs DNAse and tPA (tissue plasminogen activator) together i.e. 5mg DNAse and 10mg tPA twice a day for up to six doses, through chest tube as treatment of the patient's complicated parapneumonic effusion/empyema. Fibrinolytic therapy = DNAse + tPA; these medications are not mutually exclusive.
Instillation of DNAse and tPA together through patient's chest tube already in placed to break down complex fluid collection in the pleural space. DNAse and tPA are are administered together only i.e. are not mutually exclusive.
Other Names:
  • DNAse / tPA combination therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: From patient's admission to hospital to their discharge, (excluding extended stay due to social work reasons) up to 28 days or discharge, which ever comes first.
How long the patient remains admitted in the hospital during their index hospitalization
From patient's admission to hospital to their discharge, (excluding extended stay due to social work reasons) up to 28 days or discharge, which ever comes first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU Free Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Admission days during index hospitalization that are of a lower acuity of care than intensive care
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Chest Tube Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Days with chest tube in place after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Cost of Admission and Treatment
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Cost of care for the patient after their intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Pain Score
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
What the patient's level of pain is from 0 to 10; zero being no pain, 10 being the worst pain imaginable. score is categorical 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 or 10.
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Chest Tube Drainage
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount and character of the drainage from the chest tube after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Incentive Spirometry
Time Frame: Everyday for 5 days post study intervention, from admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
To what volume the patient can inspire using an incentive spirometer
Everyday for 5 days post study intervention, from admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Supplemental Oxygen Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount of time the patient needs to warn off any supplemental oxygen
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Fever Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount of days it takes to resolve fever (temp >100.4)
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Days of Antibiotics
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The number of days antibiotics are required after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Elevated White Blood Count Days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
The amount of days it takes to resolve a leukocytosis
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Changed in Coagulopathic Status
Time Frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.
Changes in laboratory TEG values after intervention
From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fredric Pieracci, MD, MPH, Denver Health and Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coagulopathy

Clinical Trials on VATS Decortication

Subscribe