Dutch Intracerebral Hemorrhage Surgery Trial Pilot Study (DIST pilot)

October 11, 2022 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

The Dutch Intracerebral Hemorrhage Surgery Trial Pilot Study; Minimally-invasive Endoscopy-guided Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Background:

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 15-20% of all strokes in Western Europe, and contributes profoundly to mortality and disability. Thirty day case fatality is 40% and of those surviving, only few gain independence. Except for stroke unit care and early blood pressure lowering there is currently no treatment of proven benefit. Important predictors of poor outcome are increasing age, decreasing Glasgow Coma Scale score, increasing ICH volume, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage and deep or infratentorial location. In addition, secondary injury due to development of edema and inflammatory response, contribute to disability and death. Surgical treatment, mostly comprising craniotomy, has so far not been proven effective. In the largest trials STICH and STICH II, the median time to treatment was more than 24 hours, which may be an important explanation for the lack of treatment effect.

The investigators hypothesize that early, minimally-invasive, endoscopy-guided surgery improves outcome in patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH.

Objective: to study safety, feasibility and technical effectiveness of minimally-invasive endoscopy guided surgery for treatment of spontaneous supratentorial ICH and to estimate the potential effect on outcome.

Study design: a multicenter, prospective intervention study (phase II) with a telephonic follow up interview at 90 and 180 days.The pilot study serves as a prelude to a randomized phase III trial in which the investigators aim to assess whether this intervention improves functional outcome at 90 and 180 days.

Study population: patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH of 18 years and older. Forty patients in three participating centers (Radboudumc, Erasmus MC and AMC) will undergo minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery. Three-hundred-and-sixty patients undergoing standard medical treatment in one of 7 other participating centers, will be included as a control group.

Intervention: minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery within 8 hours of symptom onset, in addition to standard medical management.

Primary study outcomes: safety (death within 24 hours, 7-day procedure related complications, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality) and technical effectiveness (proportional volume reduction, proportion of participants with volume reduction > 60 and >80%, and proportion with remaining clot volume <15mL).

Secondary outcomes: modified Rankin Scale score at 90 and 180 days after ICH (functional outcome).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The full protocol is available at https://dutch-ich.nl/trial-protocol-and-trial-documents.html

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
169

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Academic Medical Center
      • Den Haag, Netherlands
        • Haaglanden Medical Center
      • Enschede, Netherlands
        • Medisch Spectrum Twente
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
        • Leiden University Medical Center
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Maastricht University Medical Center
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CE
        • Erasmus Medical Center
      • Tilburg, Netherlands
        • Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
      • Zwolle, Netherlands
        • Isala
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525 GC
        • Radboud University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18
  2. NIHSS ≥ 2
  3. Supratentorial ICH confirmed by CT, without a CT-angiography confirmed causative vascular lesion (e.g. aneurysma, arteriovenous malformation [AVM], dural arteriovenous fistula [DAVF], cerebral venous sinus thrombosis [CVST]).
  4. Minimal lesion size 10 mL
  5. Intervention can be started within 8 hours from symptoms onset; or for controls presentation within 8 hours of symptom onset.
  6. Patient's or legal representative's written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pre-stroke disability, which interferes with the assessment of functional outcome at 90 days, i.e. mRS > 2
  2. Causative vascular lesion (e.g. aneurysm, AVM, DAVF, CVST) on CT-angiography or other known underlying cause (e.g. tumor, cavernoma)
  3. Untreated coagulation abnormalities, including INR > 1.3 (point of care measurement allowed) and treatment with oral thrombin or factor X antagonists; patients on vitamin K antagonist can be included after correction of the INR.
  4. Current known severe infection for which antibiotic treatment at time of ICH symptom onset
  5. Patient moribund (e.g. coning, bilateral dilated unresponsive pupils)
  6. Pregnancy (note: most patients will be beyond child bearing age; if not a pregnancy test is mandatory).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Surgical treatment
Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery or hematoma aspiration, additional to standard medical treatment.
Device: Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery
Surgery started within 8 hours of onset of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Other Names:
  • Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided hematoma aspiration
No Intervention: Standard medical management
Standard medical treatment (treatment of bloodpressure, admission to stroke unit and supportive care, surgical treatment if necessary in case of deterioration)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death within 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
Death within 24 hours after baseline.
24 hours
Neurological deterioration within 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
Neurological deterioration, defined as an increase of ≥4 points on the sumscore of the NIHSS or >2 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)is a sum score, composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that ability, while a higher score indicates the level of impairment. The total score varies between 0 (no symptoms at all) and 42. points on one item of NIHSS,
24 hours
Proportion of volume reduction
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 hours (based on the comparison baseline CT and CT at 24 hours).
The proportion of volume reduction, based on baseline CT and CT at 24 hours (in the intervention group).
Baseline and 24 hours (based on the comparison baseline CT and CT at 24 hours).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure related complications
Time Frame: 7 days
The proportion of patients with procedure related complications at 7 days, including: rebleed, intracranial hemorrhage, epileptic seizures and intracranial infection. (in the intervention group)
7 days
Mortality at 7 days
Time Frame: 7 days
Proportion of patients that died within 7 days after baseline
7 days
Mortality at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
Proportion of patients that died within 30 days after baseline
30 days
Percentage of patients with clot volume reduction ≥60%
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 hours CT (the difference is measured)
The proportion of patients in which the clot volume could be reduced with 60% or more, based on the comparison baseline CT and CT at 24 hours. (in the intervention group)
Baseline and 24 hours CT (the difference is measured)
Percentage of patients with clot volume reduction ≥ 80%
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 hours CT (the difference is measured)
The proportion of patients in which the clot volume could be reduced with 80% or more, based on the comparison baseline CT and CT at 24 hours. (in the intervention group)
Baseline and 24 hours CT (the difference is measured)
Percentage of patients with remaining clot volume of ≤ 15mL
Time Frame: 24 hours CT
The proportion of patients in which due to clot removal a remaining clot volume of ≤ 15mL was established at 24 hours. (in the intervention group)
24 hours CT
Proportion of conversion to craniotomy
Time Frame: 24 hours
The proportion of patients in which a conversion to craniotomy was required and done. (in the intervention group)
24 hours
Functional outcome at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (90 days)

Ordinal shift in functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the controls), assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. This is a six point scale in which a score of 0 means no symptoms at all, a higher score means more impairment, and a score of 6 means the participant is dead.

A favorable outcome is defined as mRS 0-3 and mRS 0-2.
3 months (90 days)
Functional outcome at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (180 days)

Ordinal shift in functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the controls), , assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months. This is a six point scale in which a score of 0 means no symptoms at all, a higher score means more impairment, and a score of 6 means the participant is dead.

A favorable outcome is defined as mRS 0-3 and mRS 0-2.
6 months (180 days)
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 7 days or discharge
Time Frame: 7 days (or at discharge from the hospital if earlier)
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)is a sum score, composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that ability, while a higher score indicates the level of impairment. The total score varies between 0 (no symptoms at all) and 42.
7 days (or at discharge from the hospital if earlier)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Radboud University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Dutch Heart Foundation
Penumbra Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ruben Dammers, Dr., Erasmus Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 7, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 7, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 11, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NL6310007817

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings