The ConnectedCancerCare Pilot Study (CCC) (CCC)

October 12, 2020 updated by: University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Patient-Centered, Team-Based Continuing Care After Breast Cancer Treatment: The ConnectedCancerCare Pilot Study

This study is an NCI-funded, randomized control pilot trial to evaluate: (1) the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based, personalized navigation tool (ConnectedCancerCare) and (2) explore whether the tool improves delivery of team-based survivorship care for women who have recently finished primary breast cancer treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized control pilot trial involving 60 women newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer who are finishing primary treatment. Participants will be randomized either to the intervention arm (CCC website that provides information on team-based follow-up care for both cancer surveillance and preventive care) or the control arm (static online survivorship care plan template, adapted from the ASCO breast cancer survivorship template). The feasibility and acceptability of the tool and correlations with patient-reported outcomes will be assessed 3 months following the completion of a baseline survey via an online follow-up survey.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 84 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with early Stage (0-IIB) breast cancer
  • Must be a patient of a University of Michigan Breast Cancer Oncologist
  • Must be completing primary cancer treatment and transitioning into survivorship
  • Must be able to speak, read and write in English
  • Must have access and the ability to use the internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with stage III or IV breast cancer
  • Unable to speak, read, and write in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CCC Website
The intervention, ConnectedCancerCare (CCC) Website is a personalized, navigation tool that is tailored to patients' preferences for provider roles in follow-up care, their satisfaction with their current primary care provider, and their worry about cancer recurrence. It involves a personalized, patient-facing website which includes a baseline survey, tailored educational modules, and a guide for their survivorship care, as well as a text or email based reminder system. The intervention also includes a provider-facing summary document, which will be faxed to both the oncology and primary care teams.
Behavioral: CCC website
ConnectedCancerCare (CCC) is a web-based guide to support survivorship care for women who have been treated for early-stage (stages 0-II) breast cancer. It encourages patients to utilize team-based care by oncologists and primary care physicians and provides them with the information on cancer surveillance, screenings and preventive healthcare during survivorship.
Other Names:
  • ConnectedCancerCare
Other: Static care plan
The control arm will receive is a static survivorship care plan template in PDF format that includes information similar to what an oncologist currently provides as "standard of care."
Behavioral: Static care plan
The control is a static survivorship care plan template in PDF format that includes information similar to what an oncologist currently provides as "standard of care."

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Breast Cancer Patients Successfully Recruited to Participate in the Study
Time Frame: At baseline survey
We anticipate a response rate of 80% enrollment (n=60). We will assess the number of patients successfully recruited who enroll and complete the baseline survey.
At baseline survey

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rating the Experience With the CCC Web-based, Survivorship Care Plan
Time Frame: Follow-Up Survey: 3 months
Acceptability and usability assessed by the following 6 key factors: 1. Ease of use; 2. Helpful during the transition to survivorship; 3. Helpful in terms of planning when to see my PCP and when to see my Oncologist; 4."Would recommend CCC to other patients"; 5. Length of time it took to go through the website; 6. Amount of information on the website. Each of the 6 factors will be assessed using a 5-point (1-5) Likert scale with higher scores (3, 4, 5) representing better acceptance and usability of the CCC website. Based on prior work, a cut off of 50% or more reporting a score of 3 or higher will be used to measure acceptance within each domain. The average of each participant's responses to the 6 items will result in one score per participant, on a scale of 1 - 5. A single summary score of acceptability across all participants will be determined by averaging the individual scores. On a scale of 1-5, a score of 3 or higher indicates acceptability to the majority of participants.
Follow-Up Survey: 3 months
Percentage of Patients Reporting a Preference for an Oncologist vs. PCP for Their Continuing Cancer Care Services
Time Frame: 3 months
An 8 item list of continuing care services adapted from the CanSORT Provider Roles Scale (iCanCare Study) is used to assess participants' preferences for seeing their Oncologist or PCP.
3 months
Percentage of Patients Scheduling a Primary Care Physician (PCP) Appointment
Time Frame: 3 months
The percentage of patients who have scheduled a follow-up visit with their PCP after viewing the CCC web tool (intervention arm) or after receiving the static survivorship care plan (control arm).
3 months
Patient-Reported Satisfaction With Oncologist/PCP Coordination of Care
Time Frame: 3 months
A 5-point scale will be used to ask patients to rate their satisfaction with the coordination of care provided by their Oncologist and PCP. The rating scale will range from a value of 1 ('not at all') to a value of 5 ('extremely satisfied'), with a higher numeric value representing greater satisfaction with coordination of care. The mean satisfaction scores will be compared between the intervention and control arms.
3 months
Percentage of Patients That Communicated With PCP About Provider Roles
Time Frame: 3 months
Communication with PCP about provider roles was measured using an item adapted to the patient perspective from a prior study of providers' views about shared cancer care roles. Patients were asked if they communicated in the past 3 months with their PCP about who will manage specific aspects of their survivorship care (yes/no).
3 months
Knowledge About Team-based Survivorship Care
Time Frame: 3 months
Knowledge about team-based survivorship care was measured utilizing an 8-item scale adapted from the Perceived Primary Care Delivery of Survivorship Care Scale. It includes items specific to patients' knowledge of PCPs roles in team-based care delivery, (e.g. second cancer screening, symptom management). The responses were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The responses to the 8 items were then averaged to create a mean knowledge summary score for each participant, ranging from 1 to 5, with higher values representing greater knowledge about team-based survivorship care.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lauren P Wallner, Ph.D, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 8, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UMCC 2018.016
  • K07CA201052 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • HUM00115786 (Other Identifier: University of Michigan)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings