Risk-stratified Therapy Based on Molecular Cytogenetic Aberration and Treatment Response in AML

October 31, 2019 updated by: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Risk-stratified Therapy Based on Molecular and Cytogenetic Aberration and Treatment Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Risk-stratified therapy based on molecular and cytogenetic for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is well accepted and benefits patients' survival. However, neither every patient with low risk factors obtains better survival, nor all high risk patients experience worse outcome. Lots of data have shown that the early treatment response presenting as minimal residual disease (MRD) has an important role in prognostic prediction. In this study, we perform risk stratification based on not only Cytogenetic and Molecular characteristic, but also MRD after three courses of chemo therapy in AML cohort. Patients with MRD positive would be moved to a higher risk class. And then the risk-stratified therapy should be considered according to the new risk stratification.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Risk-stratified therapy based on cytogenetic and molecular characteristic for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is well accepted and benefits patients' survival. However, neither every patient with low risk factors obtains better survival, nor all high risk patients experience worse outcome. Lots of data have shown the important role of early treatment response presenting as minimal residual disease (MRD) in prognostic prediction. In this study, we perform risk stratification based on not only cytogenetic and molecular characteristic, but also MRD levels after three courses of chemo therapy. We stratified all patients into different risk groups according to the NCCN guild based on cytogenetic and molecular. Then we treat all patients with anthracycline combined with cytarabine regimens for two courses (First cycle: IDA 12mg/m2 or DNR 60mg/m2, d1-3, Ara-C 100mg/m2 d1-7; Second cycle: IDA 10mg/m2 or DNR 45mg/m2, d1-3, Ara-C 2g/m2 q12h, d1-3) . The patients without obtaining complete remission (CR) will go on one cycle of salvage therapy and then be bridged to allogeneic (allo-) hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Those acquiring CR will be given one course of high dose cytarabine (HDAC) as consolidation treatment and then be detested MRD with flow cytometry after that. The patients with MRD positive would be moved to a higher risk class.The stratified therapy should be considered according to the new risk stratification.The patients with MRD negative in low risk group are given HDAC (Ara-C 2g/m2 q12h, d1-3) for 3 cycles. If MRD is continuously negative in this cohort, chemotherapy will be stopped and MRD will be continuously monitored to the third year after the diagnosis. The patients with MRD negative in medium risk group are suggested to receive allo-HSCT if a HLA-matched sibling donor is available, or autologous (auto-) HSCT after receiving HDAC regimen for one more cycle if no HLA-matched sibling donors are available. The patients with MRD positive in low or medium-risk group or the cases in high-risk group are going to be bridged into allo-HSCT if a donor is available including haploid donors. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the new stratification system benefits AML patients with better OS and DFS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Qifa Liu
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All newly diagnosed AML exclusively of APL with age range from 14 to 60-year old.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All newly diagnosed AML exclusively of APL with age range from 14 to 60-year old

Exclusion Criteria:

Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., organ function failure, serious infection ) Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Risk stratification
Risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular and MRD level after three courses of chemo therapy.
Other: Justified risk stratification based on MRD after three course chemo therapy
All patients are routinely divided into different risk groups according to the NCCN guild based on cytogenetic and molecular abnormality. Then all patients are treated with anthracycline combined with cytarabine regimens for two courses . The patients without obtaining CR will go on one cycle of salvage therapy and then be bridged to allo-HSCT. Those acquiring CR will be given one more course of HDAC as consolidation treatment and then be detested MRD with flow cytometry after that. The patients with MRD positive would be moved to a higher risk class.The stratified therapy should be considered according to the new risk stratification.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
relapse rate
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Peking University People's Hospital
Guangzhou First People's Hospital
Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University
First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University
Chenzhou NO. 1 people's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 31, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Risk stratification in AML

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings