Risk-stratified Therapy Based on Molecular Cytogenetic Aberration and Treatment Response in AML

October 31, 2019 updated by: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Risk-stratified Therapy Based on Molecular and Cytogenetic Aberration and Treatment Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Risk-stratified therapy based on molecular and cytogenetic for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is well accepted and benefits patients' survival. However, neither every patient with low risk factors obtains better survival, nor all high risk patients experience worse outcome. Lots of data have shown that the early treatment response presenting as minimal residual disease (MRD) has an important role in prognostic prediction. In this study, we perform risk stratification based on not only Cytogenetic and Molecular characteristic, but also MRD after three courses of chemo therapy in AML cohort. Patients with MRD positive would be moved to a higher risk class. And then the risk-stratified therapy should be considered according to the new risk stratification.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Risk-stratified therapy based on cytogenetic and molecular characteristic for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is well accepted and benefits patients' survival. However, neither every patient with low risk factors obtains better survival, nor all high risk patients experience worse outcome. Lots of data have shown the important role of early treatment response presenting as minimal residual disease (MRD) in prognostic prediction. In this study, we perform risk stratification based on not only cytogenetic and molecular characteristic, but also MRD levels after three courses of chemo therapy. We stratified all patients into different risk groups according to the NCCN guild based on cytogenetic and molecular. Then we treat all patients with anthracycline combined with cytarabine regimens for two courses (First cycle: IDA 12mg/m2 or DNR 60mg/m2, d1-3, Ara-C 100mg/m2 d1-7; Second cycle: IDA 10mg/m2 or DNR 45mg/m2, d1-3, Ara-C 2g/m2 q12h, d1-3) . The patients without obtaining complete remission (CR) will go on one cycle of salvage therapy and then be bridged to allogeneic (allo-) hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Those acquiring CR will be given one course of high dose cytarabine (HDAC) as consolidation treatment and then be detested MRD with flow cytometry after that. The patients with MRD positive would be moved to a higher risk class.The stratified therapy should be considered according to the new risk stratification.The patients with MRD negative in low risk group are given HDAC (Ara-C 2g/m2 q12h, d1-3) for 3 cycles. If MRD is continuously negative in this cohort, chemotherapy will be stopped and MRD will be continuously monitored to the third year after the diagnosis. The patients with MRD negative in medium risk group are suggested to receive allo-HSCT if a HLA-matched sibling donor is available, or autologous (auto-) HSCT after receiving HDAC regimen for one more cycle if no HLA-matched sibling donors are available. The patients with MRD positive in low or medium-risk group or the cases in high-risk group are going to be bridged into allo-HSCT if a donor is available including haploid donors. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the new stratification system benefits AML patients with better OS and DFS.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Qifa Liu
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All newly diagnosed AML exclusively of APL with age range from 14 to 60-year old.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All newly diagnosed AML exclusively of APL with age range from 14 to 60-year old

Exclusion Criteria:

Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., organ function failure, serious infection ) Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Risk stratification
Risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular and MRD level after three courses of chemo therapy.
All patients are routinely divided into different risk groups according to the NCCN guild based on cytogenetic and molecular abnormality. Then all patients are treated with anthracycline combined with cytarabine regimens for two courses . The patients without obtaining CR will go on one cycle of salvage therapy and then be bridged to allo-HSCT. Those acquiring CR will be given one more course of HDAC as consolidation treatment and then be detested MRD with flow cytometry after that. The patients with MRD positive would be moved to a higher risk class.The stratified therapy should be considered according to the new risk stratification.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
relapse rate
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Risk stratification in AML

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MRD

Subscribe