NEUWAVE Flexible Probe Study #2

May 29, 2020 updated by: Ethicon, Inc.

A Multicenter Study of the NEUWAVE Flex Microwave Ablation System in the Ablation of Secondary Soft Tissue Lesions of the Lung

Patients with medically inoperable and operable secondary soft tissue lesion(s) of the lung will have transbronchial microwave ablation performed using cone beam CT for probe guidance and confirmation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adult patients with medically inoperable and operable secondary soft tissue lesion(s) of the lung less than 2cm will undergo transbronchial microwave ablation performed by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon using cone beam CT imaging for probe guidance and confirmation on ablation outcome. All treated patients will be followed for one year following the ablation procedure for efficacy and safety.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States, 28374
        • Firsthealth Moore Regional Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed Informed Consent
  2. Patients greater or equal to 18 years of age
  3. Performance status 0-2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification [ECOG])
  4. Willing to fulfill all follow-up visit requirements
  5. Medically inoperable and operable secondary soft tissue lesion(s) of the lung
  6. A maximum of two ipsilateral soft tissue lesions less than or equal to 2cm in the outer two-thirds of the lung and not closer than 1cm to the pleura. Lesion size must be measured with at least 2-dimensional imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Scheduled concurrent procedure for the target soft tissue lesion(s) other than those that are lung-related
  2. Pregnant or breastfeeding
  3. Physical or psychological condition that would impair study participation
  4. Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy at the time of screening
  5. Patient with implantable devices, including pacemakers or other electronic implants
  6. Prior pneumonectomy or bronchiectasis
  7. Severe neuromuscular disease
  8. Patient count less than or equal to 50,000/mm cubed
  9. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of greater than or equal to 4
  10. Inability to tolerate anesthesia
  11. Expected survival less than 6 months
  12. Clinically significant hypertension
  13. Chronic, continuous ventilator support, which uses bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP) to improve lung function for severe conditions (however, intermittent PAP, for non-pulmonary conditions, such as sleep apnea, is permitted)
  14. Endobronchial soft tissue lesions proximal to the segmental airways
  15. Imaging findings of active pulmonary infection
  16. The patient was judged unsuitable for study participation by the Investigator for any other reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Microwave Ablation
Microwave ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via a transbronchial approach performed by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon.
Device: Microwave ablation
Microwave ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via a transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon. Prior to the ablation, the treating physician will perform an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) to confirm disease staging.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device User Experience Survey
Time Frame: Day of ablation (day 0)
The Device User Experience Survey is an unvalidated, Sponsor-generated questionnaire aimed to increase the Sponsor's understanding of the usability of the NEUWAVE microwave ablation system. The questionnaire asks approximately 30 questions (includes yes/no responses, rating scales, and fill-in-the-blank sections) and is to be completed by the treating physician at the completion of each ablation. A summary of all treating physician responses will be generated at the completion of the study to summarize the overall user experience with the device.
Day of ablation (day 0)
Technical Success (lesion completely ablated)
Time Frame: Day of ablation (day 0)
Technical Success is determined by the treating physician and is defined as the ablation zone completely overlapping or encompassing the target lesion plus an ablative margin, as assessed by cone beam CT imaging, immediately following the ablation procedure.
Day of ablation (day 0)
Technique Efficacy (lesion completely ablated)
Time Frame: 30 days post-ablation
Technique Efficacy is determined by the treating physician and is defined as the ablation zone completely overlapping or encompassing the target lesion plus an ablative margin, as assessed by cone beam CT imaging, at Visit 3 (i.e. 30 days post-ablation).
30 days post-ablation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1 year post-ablation
Any AEs attributable to the ablation procedure, including all device-related, procedure-related, and SAEs, evaluated from the start of the ablation procedure throughout the entirety of the study (i.e. through 1 year post-ablation).
1 year post-ablation
Primary Efficacy Rate
Time Frame: Day of ablation (day 0)
The Primary Efficacy Rate is the percentage of target lesions successfully eradicated following the first ablation procedure, as assessed using CT imaging by the treating physician on the day of ablation.
Day of ablation (day 0)
Secondary Efficacy Rate
Time Frame: 1 year post-ablation
The Secondary Efficacy Rate is defined as the percentage of soft tissue lesions that have undergone successful repeat ablations following identification of local soft tissue lesions progression, as assessed using CT imaging by the treating physician throughout the entirety of the study (i.e. 1 year post-ablation).
1 year post-ablation
Target Lesion Recurrence
Time Frame: 1 year post-ablation
Target Lesion Recurrence is defined as the reappearance of the lesion(s) at the treated site, as assessed using CT imaging by the treating physician throughout the entirety of the study (i.e. through 1 year post-ablation).
1 year post-ablation
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Day of ablation (day 0)
The Length of Hospital Stay is defined as the length of time of hospitalization from the end of the ablation procedure to the time of discharge (up to 23 hours post-ablation).
Day of ablation (day 0)
Hospital Readmission Rate
Time Frame: 30 days post-ablation
The Hospital Readmission Rate is defined as the percentage of patients who were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of the ablation procedure.
30 days post-ablation

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: 1 year post-ablation
The EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ-C30 is a quality of life questionnaire with 30 questions aimed specifically for cancer patients. Patients will complete this questionnaire at each study visit.
1 year post-ablation
EORTC QLQ-LC13
Time Frame: 1 year post-ablation
The EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ-C30 is a quality of life questionnaire with 13 questions aimed specifically for lung cancer patients. The questionnaire asks patients to rate their responses on a scale from 1-4 (1 being "not at all" and 4 being "very much"). Patients will complete this questionnaire at each study visit.
1 year post-ablation
Numeric Pain Scale
Time Frame: 30 days post-ablation
The Numeric Pain Scale is a questionnaire where the patient reports their pain on a scale from 0-10 (where 0 is 'no pain' and 10 is 'maximum pain). Patients will complete this questionnaire at each study visit through 30 days post-ablation.
30 days post-ablation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ethicon, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 31, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NEU_2018_01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings