Upper Airway Stimulation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

March 24, 2020 updated by: Technical University of Munich

Selective Upper Airway Stimulation Compared to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a Prospective Cohort Study

Standard therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). 30% to 50% are not adherent to this therapy and need an alternative treatment. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation or selective upper airway stimulation has been developed since several years. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare both treatments with each other.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

6% to 13% of the western industrialized population suffer from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). During sleep in the pharyngeal airway a relaxation of the muscles occurs with increasing depth of sleep. Finally, this relaxation, due to the anatomical conditions, lead to obstructions of the respiratory tract, resulting in respiratory arrest (apnea) and minor respiratory changes such as hypopneas or flow limitations. The symptoms of this disease manifest themselves with varying degrees. Increased daytime sleepiness, snoring, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease can result. A significant reduction in overall quality of life can be associated with OSAS. The gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea is CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure). But only about 50% to 70% of patients continue to use their device after 2 years of initial CPAP therapy. This means that 30% to 50% of patients are no longer cared for their obstructive sleep apnea. A certain proportion of younger patients, in particular, reject nocturnal ventilation therapy with CPAP from the beginning. For these patients selective upper airway stimulation (UAS) is a therapy option.

Therefore the patient receives surgically a subcutaneous stimulation device under the clavicle, which receives a signal from a respiratory sensor to selectively stimulate the hypoglossal nerve. The respiratory sensor is located in the 4th or 5th intercostal space between the patient's external and internal rib muscles. This can be used to record the patient's breathing, which allows a matched stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. The actual stimulation lead is attached to the medial branches of the hypoglossal nerve, which are responsible for the protrusion of the tongue, in order to enable appropriate stimulation.

In this prospective cohort study, selective upper airway stimulation (UAS) will now be compared with CPAP therapy. Patients receiving CPAP therapy are compared to UAS patients who receive an upper airway stimulation. Both methods are procedures established in clinical routine, and during this investigation, the general clinical course is not deviated. Randomization does not occur because CPAP therapy is a conservative therapy and UAS therapy is a surgical therapy. Furthermore, for UAS therapy, there must be a CPAP incompliance, so that a surgical concept is justified. The CPAP group should comply with the body mass index and age of the UAS group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

227

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81667
        • Technical University of Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All consecutive patients who either received UAS implantation (Inspire therapy) in our Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at the Klinikum rechts der Isar and all patients who received a CPAP therapy since July 2013, are invited to participate in this clinical examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with the age under 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1 (CPAP)
Patient, who are receiving a CPAP
One group of patients with CPAP
Experimental: Group 2 (UAS)
Patient, who are receiving a device for upper airway stimulation
One group of patients with UAS
Other Names:
  • Inspire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AHI
Time Frame: reduction from baseline to 12 months
Apnea Hypopnea Index measured in events per hour
reduction from baseline to 12 months
ODI
Time Frame: reduction from baseline to 12 months
Oxygen desaturation index measured in events per hour
reduction from baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ESS
Time Frame: improvement from baseline to 12 months
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
improvement from baseline to 12 months
FOSQ
Time Frame: improvement from baseline to 12 months
Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire
improvement from baseline to 12 months
Usage
Time Frame: usage hours per night at 12 months
Usage Hour per Night
usage hours per night at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UAS vs. CPAP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on continuous positive airway pressure

Search Similar Trials