The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in a Liver Transplant Recipient

October 5, 2020 updated by: Waqas Farooqui, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in a Liver Transplant Recipient (TRSPLNT) - A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded Clinical Trial.

Ischemia and reperfusion injury is unavoidable during a liver transplantation. Remote ischemic preconditioning, a safe and feasible method, has previously been shown to reduce ischemia and reperfusion injury. In the transplantation setting, focus of remote ischemic preconditioning has been on the donor. However, preconditioning of the recipient may be a better approach due to the mechanisms by which ischemic preconditioning protects against ischemia and reperfusion injury.

The aim of this randomised, double-blinded clinical trial is to biochemically assess the liver function after application of remote ischemic preconditioning on the recipient.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background The use of solid organ transplantation, including liver transplantation, is the golden standard for many end-stage solid organ diseases. Ischemia and reperfusion injury is unavoidable during a liver transplantation. Remote ischemic preconditioning, a safe and feasible method, has previously been shown to reduce ischemia and reperfusion injury. This may have a similar effect in a liver transplantation setting. In the transplantation setting, focus of remote ischemic preconditioning has been on the donor. However, preconditioning of the recipient may be a better approach due to the mechanisms by which ischemic preconditioning protects against ischemia and reperfusion injury.

The aim of this randomised, double-blinded clinical trial is to biochemically assess the liver function after application of remote ischemic preconditioning on the recipient.

Methods 52 patients undergoing a liver transplantation, included in accordance to the inclusion criteria, will be allocated to an intervention group (rIC-group) and compared to a retrospective non-intervention control group (non-rIC group) consisting of 52 patients. Patients in the non-intervention group will also be included in accordance to the inclusion criteria. Within two hours before surgery, patients in the intervention group will be subjected to four rounds of five-minute inflations and five-minute deflations of a pneumatic tourniquet applied on the right leg.

Follow-up time will be 30 days.

Measurements The aim of this trial is to assess the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on the extent of liver injury and inflammation as a result of ischemia and reperfusion injury. Assessment will be done by measurement of biomarkers relevant to liver function and liver injury.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing liver transplantation
  • Patients aged 18 or above
  • Patients who have given an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing re-transplantation.
  • Patients who do not or cannot give an informed consent.
  • Patients who have undergone surgery six weeks prior to liver transplantation.
  • Patients with known peripheral vascular disease.
  • Patients with an infection localized to the area of rIC-intervention
  • Patients with at a high risk or with previous history of multiple thrombo-embolic diseases.
  • Patients undergoing active immunosuppressive therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: intervention group (rIC)
The rIC procedure will be applied on seated patients, who have been resting for at least five minutes. The active rIC procedure consists of four five-minute inflations of a pneumatic tourniquet to 100 mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure separated by five-minute periods of complete deflation. Placement of the pneumatic tourniquet will be unilaterally on a lower limb (right thigh)
Procedure: remote ischemic preconditioning (rIC)
Short intermittent peripheral occlusions and reperfusions of the blood flow in the right lower extremity with the help of a tourniquet.
Other: control group (non-rIC)
The control group will be a retrospective group, who have undergone a liver transplantation and meet the inclusion criteria.
Other: non remote ischemic preconditioning (non-rIC)
Retrospective group who have not undergone intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative change in ALT
Time Frame: Day 0-4
Extent of liver injury measured as change in ALT postoperative from day zero to day four .
Day 0-4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative change in Aspartate Amonitransferase
Time Frame: Day 0-4
Serological markers of liver function
Day 0-4
Post-operative change in Bilirubin
Time Frame: Day 0-4
Serological markers of liver function
Day 0-4
Post-operative change in Alkaline Phosphatase
Time Frame: Day 0-4
Serological markers of liver function
Day 0-4
Post-operative change in International Normalised Ratio
Time Frame: Day 0-4
Serological markers of liver function
Day 0-4

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication rate
Time Frame: Follow-up on day 30
Rate of post-operative complications
Follow-up on day 30
Days in ICU (Intensive Care Unit)
Time Frame: Follow-up on day 30
Length of post-operative stay in ICU
Follow-up on day 30
Total length of hospital-stay
Time Frame: Follow-up on day 30
Follow-up on day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Waqas Farooqui, MD, doctor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TRSPLNT001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Transplant; Complications

Clinical Trials on remote ischemic preconditioning (rIC)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings