Usability of Diabetes Dashboard Embedded Within a Patient Web Portal

May 5, 2023 updated by: William Martinez, MD, MS, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Usability of Diabetes Dashboard Embedded Within a Patient Web Portal: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

The purpose of this study is to conduct a prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the usability of a patient-facing diabetes dashboard delivered via an established patient web portal.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Up to 70 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus will be enrolled and given access to a diabetes dashboard within an existing patient web portal. Patients will be invited by mail (or email) to be screened for enrollment in the study. Patients may also respond at a study flyer and contact the study team to be screened for enrollment. Eligible and interested patients will be emailed a link to a secure study website where they will complete a web consent form. After enrollment, participants will complete a baseline web-based questionnaire. After completing the enrollment questionnaire, they will be provided access to the diabetes dashboard within the patient web portal for one month. After one month, participants will receive an additional follow-up (final) questionnaire to assess outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
69

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • William Martinez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Currently being treated with at least one antihyperglycemic medication
  • Able to speak and read in English
  • Have reliable access to a computer with internet access
  • Existing My Health at Vanderbilt (i.e., patient portal) account

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Living in long term care facilities
  • Known cognitive deficits
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment
  • Unintelligible speech (e.g., dysarthria)
  • Currently participating in another diabetes-related research study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Patients have access to a patient web portal with the Patient-facing Diabetes Dashboard activated.
Other: Patient-facing Diabetes Dashboard
The Patient-facing Diabetes Dashboard is embedded within a patient web portal and includes graphics to visualize and summarize patients' health data, incorporates motivational strategies (e.g., social comparisons and gamification), provides literacy level appropriate educational resources, and contains secure-messaging capability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability
Time Frame: one month follow-up (T1)
The System Usability Scale (SUS) will be administered to all study participants at one month follow-up (T1). The SUS is a validated measure of usability. The ten items are scored on a five-point Likert scale. The item scores are summed and then converted to a score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A score of above 68 indicative of "above average" usability.
one month follow-up (T1)
User Experience - Quantitative
Time Frame: one month follow-up (T1)
User experience will be assessed by study-specific survey items administered to all study participants at the end of the study period (T1). The survey items will inquire about participants' perspectives on particular features of the Patient-facing Diabetes Dashboard. Participants were asked to indicate which features, if any: (1) they found useful for managing their diabetes and which features, (2) improved their understanding of their diabetes health data, and (3) should be removed. In addition, participants indicated whether they intended to use the dashboard going forward if it remained available.
one month follow-up (T1)
User Experience - Qualitative
Time Frame: one month follow-up (T1)
At the end of the study period (T1), a subset of study participants will be invited to complete a semi-structured interview to provide a deeper understanding of their experience using the dashboard.
one month follow-up (T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usage Data
Time Frame: one month follow-up (T1)
This is a composite outcome measure of participants' self-reported total number of diabetes dashboard visits, total duration of dashboard use, use of embedded educational links, utilization of embedded functionality to secure message healthcare team member(s), and use of an embedded link to American Diabetes Association Online Community and will be queried at the end of the study period (T1).
one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Diabetes Knowledge
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
The Short Diabetes Knowledge Instrument (SDKI) was used to measure diabetes knowledge including diabetes diet, symptoms of hypoglycemia, foot care and importance of physical activity. The SDKI is a 13-item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 13 representing number of items answered correctly. The Short Diabetes Knowledge Instrument (SDKI) will be administered to all study patients at enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1).
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Diabetes Self-Care
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Diabetes self-care will be measured using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), an 11-item questionnaire of diabetes self-management that assess the following six aspects of the diabetes regimen: general diet (2 items), specific diet (2 items), exercise (2 items), blood-glucose testing (2 items), foot care (2 items), and smoking (1 items). Item responses use the metric "days per week" except for a single item about smoking status which is yes or no. Each of the five aspects (excluding smoking) is assigned a mean score based on number of days per week. The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) will be administered to all study patients at enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1).
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Diabetes Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
The Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS) is a valid measure of diabetes self-efficacy. The PDSMS will be administered to all study participants at enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1). Eight items are scored on a five-point Likert scale. The total PDSMS score can range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating more confidence in self-managing one's diabetes.
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Diabetes Distress
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5) is a valid measure of diabetes distress. The PAID-5 will be administered to all study participants at enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1). Total scores on the PAID-5 can range from 0 to 20, with higher scores suggesting greater diabetes-related emotional distress.
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Knowledge of Diabetes Measures
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Unique study specific items to assess participants' knowledge of measures of diabetes health status (e.g., Hemoglobin A1C) will be administered to all study participants at enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1).
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Diabetes Understanding
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
The Diabetes Care Profile (DCP) is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the social and psychological factors related to diabetes and its treatment. The instrument includes sixteen scales. The Understanding Scale of the DCP contains 13 items that assesses respondents' perceived understanding of elements of diabetes self-care (e.g., diet for blood sugar control). We administered 9 of the 13 items to study participants, excluding items that referenced elements of self-management that are not covered in My Diabetes Care (e.g., pregnancy and diabetes). Respondents rate their understanding on a five-point Likert scale. The scale scores range from 1 to 5 and represents the average item score for the scale (∑ Q1-9/ Count of non-missing items). High scores indicate higher perceived understanding.
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Attitudes
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Unique study specific survey items to assess participants' attitudes toward receiving social and goal-based comparison information regarding their diabetes health status will be administered to all study participants at enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1).
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
Change in Patient Activation
Time Frame: enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)
The Patient Activation Measure® (PAM-13) scale will be administered to all study participants at enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1). The 13-item PAM® survey is a validated measure of patient activation (i.e., the knowledge, skills and confidence a person has in managing their own health and health care) and consists of 13 items. Each item uses a 4-point Likert-type scale of response options ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree to elicit endorsement of a particular statement. PAM® survey item responses result in total raw scores ranging from 13 to 52, which we converted to the linear interval scale of patient activation scores, ranging from 0 (lowest activation) to 100 (highest activation).
enrollment (T0) and one month follow-up (T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: William Martinez, MD, MS, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 27, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 13, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 13, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 181727
  • 5K23DK106511 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings