Light Treatment to Improve Symptom Management of Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Bright Light Treatment at Home to Improve Symptom Management of Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- The University of Michigan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Meet criteria for Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant chronic disease
- Severe hearing or memory problems
- Pending medical leave applications at workplace
- Current pregnancy, breastfeeding, or actively trying to get pregnant
- Night work or travel outside the eastern time zone within 1 month of the study
- Other research participation
- Frequent number of special events during study period (weddings, concerts, exams, etc).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Light therapy A (Bright) via the Re-Timer®
|
Subjects will conduct light treatment in the mornings at home for one hour using Re-timer®.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Light therapy B (Dim) via the Re-Timer®
|
Subjects will conduct light treatment in the mornings at home for one hour using Re-timer®.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Revised (FIQ-R) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)
|
The FIQR consisted of 21 questions.
Each question had 11 boxes similar to a visual analog scale.
Questions covered the difficulty associated with various physical activities and the severity of symptoms.
The score for the questions was on a scale from 0 - 100, where lower scores represented better functional status.
|
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heat Pain Threshold Assessed by the Heat Pain Sensitivity Test
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)
|
Pain threshold was assessed during a heat pain sensitivity task using a Medoc TSAII NeuroSensory Analyzer and an ascending method of limits protocol.
The threshold was the temperature (in degrees Celsius) at which the participant reported the stimulus felt painful.
|
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)
|
|
Heat Pain Tolerance Assessed by the Heat Pain Sensitivity Test
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).
|
Pain tolerance was assessed during a heat pain sensitivity task using a Medoc TSAII NeuroSensory Analyzer and an ascending method of limits protocol.
The tolerance was the temperature (in degrees Celsius) at which the participant reported the stimulus was so painful that they had to stop.
|
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).
|
|
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Score
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).
|
Pain was assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a short form, which assesses worst and average pain in the past 7 days (1=no pain to 5=very severe) and current level of pain (1=no pain to 5= very severe).
Scores were summed and converted to a T score metric (mean ±SD, 50 ±10); higher scores indicate more pain.
|
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Helen Burgess, University of Michigan
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00151160
- 1R21NR016930-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Informed Consent Form (ICF)
- Analytic Code
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.