Light Treatment to Improve Symptom Management of Fibromyalgia Syndrome

September 27, 2022 updated by: Helen Burgess, University of Michigan

Bright Light Treatment at Home to Improve Symptom Management of Fibromyalgia Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect a morning light treatment has on improving physical function, pain intensity, and pain sensitivity in people with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • The University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Meet criteria for Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant chronic disease
  • Severe hearing or memory problems
  • Pending medical leave applications at workplace
  • Current pregnancy, breastfeeding, or actively trying to get pregnant
  • Night work or travel outside the eastern time zone within 1 month of the study
  • Other research participation
  • Frequent number of special events during study period (weddings, concerts, exams, etc).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Light therapy A (Bright) via the Re-Timer®
  • 60 minutes/day
  • For the first hour after waking
Subjects will conduct light treatment in the mornings at home for one hour using Re-timer®.
Other Names:
  • Re-Timer®
Active Comparator: Light therapy B (Dim) via the Re-Timer®
  • 60 minutes/day
  • For the first hour after waking
Subjects will conduct light treatment in the mornings at home for one hour using Re-timer®.
Other Names:
  • Re-Timer®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Revised (FIQ-R) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)
The FIQR consisted of 21 questions. Each question had 11 boxes similar to a visual analog scale. Questions covered the difficulty associated with various physical activities and the severity of symptoms. The score for the questions was on a scale from 0 - 100, where lower scores represented better functional status.
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heat Pain Threshold Assessed by the Heat Pain Sensitivity Test
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)
Pain threshold was assessed during a heat pain sensitivity task using a Medoc TSAII NeuroSensory Analyzer and an ascending method of limits protocol. The threshold was the temperature (in degrees Celsius) at which the participant reported the stimulus felt painful.
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline)
Heat Pain Tolerance Assessed by the Heat Pain Sensitivity Test
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).
Pain tolerance was assessed during a heat pain sensitivity task using a Medoc TSAII NeuroSensory Analyzer and an ascending method of limits protocol. The tolerance was the temperature (in degrees Celsius) at which the participant reported the stimulus was so painful that they had to stop.
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Score
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).
Pain was assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a short form, which assesses worst and average pain in the past 7 days (1=no pain to 5=very severe) and current level of pain (1=no pain to 5= very severe). Scores were summed and converted to a T score metric (mean ±SD, 50 ±10); higher scores indicate more pain.
Baseline (1 week), Mid-Treatment (2 weeks post-baseline), Post-Treatment (4 weeks post-baseline).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen Burgess, University of Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00151160
  • 1R21NR016930-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The researchers are open to sharing data by any appropriate mechanism indicated by NIH program staff.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After scientific papers are accepted for publication and the data will be available for 7 years after study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers requesting data will first have to sign a data sharing agreement, agreeing to the conditions of use governing access to the public release data, including restrictions against attempting to identify study participants, electronically securing the data while in use, destruction of the data after analyses are completed, reporting responsibilities, restrictions on redistribution of the data to third parties, no use of the data for commercial purposes and proper acknowledgement of the data resource.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Light therapy A (Bright) via the Re-Timer®

3
Subscribe