To Investigate the Correlation of Stroke Patients and Demoralized

March 27, 2020 updated by: Taoyuan General Hospital
This study aim to clarify the participants's mental state with Demoralization Scale- Mandarin Version(DS-MV). Based on clinical observations and literature review, investigators assume participants's DS-MV score high correlation with PHQ-9 score.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The Chinese version of Demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) was used to assess the mental state of patients with stroke after debridement. The statistical analysis test of correlation is carried out, and the reliability and validity test and the norm establishment of the Chinese version are further tested. Convenient sampling will be performed at a single medical facility. The planned implementation period is 2019/01/01 ~ 2019/12/31, and the location of the case is the rehabilitation ward and outpatient clinic of Taoyuan Hospital. The diagnosis must be: intensive stroke or hemorrhagic brain within three years. In the case of a 20- to 100-year-old clinical patient with stroke, the subject should explain the content of the case, and the subject will complete the test consent form after informed consent, and then begin the evaluation process of the self-assessment questionnaire. The assessment procedure is preceded by a clinical psychologist conducting with MMSE test to determine the cognitive function. When the patient's consciousness is blurred, the simple intelligent state test (MMSE) score less than 24 points, aphasia can not be effectively communicated, the diagnosis of mental illness or mental disorder has been recorded on the medical record, or the patient or family member is unwilling to sign the informed consent form. If the above situation is met, subjects will be excluded. The self-assessment questionnaire will obtain the scores of the subjects in the Chinese version of the Demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Statistical analysis, as well as the Chinese version of the loss of the scale of the reliability and validity of the test and the establishment of clinical norm scores.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
    • Zhongshan Rd., Taoyuan Dist
      • Taoyuan City, Zhongshan Rd., Taoyuan Dist, Taiwan, No. 1492
        • Tao-Yuan General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

infarct stroke or hemorrhagic stroke within three years

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatient and outpatient of rehabilitation department in Taoyuan General Hospital, patients diagnosis : who have an infarct stroke or hemorrhagic stroke within three years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conscious state confusion, the MMSE score less than 24.
  • Unable to understand information, speech disorders, dementia, aphasia.
  • The diagnosis of mental illness or mental disorder has been recorded on the medical history.
  • The patient or family unwilling to sign an informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) total score
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
When participants was included, investigators get on one-time assessment use the demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV). The demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) minimum score are 0, and maximum score are 96, cut-off point are 30. No subscale.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) total score split-half reliability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Divide the demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) into half, and then test the items of the previous half (item 1-12) and the second half (item 13-24) of the questionnaire. Then the two half questionnaire scores were test of correlation coefficient.Then If the degree of correlation is high, the reliability is very high.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) total score
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
When participants was included, investigators get on one-time assessment use the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) .Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) minimum score are 0, and maximum score are 27. No subscale.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) total score criterion-related validity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Correlation test between demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV) total score and Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9) total score.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Taoyuan General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TYGH107037

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings