Exclusive Enteral Nutrition and Corticosteroids Therapy in Crohn's Disease (EENCD) (EENCD)

August 31, 2020 updated by: Maria Ines Pinto Sanchez, McMaster University

Synergistic Effect of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Formula in Addition to Corticosteroids Therapy to Induce Clinical Remission in Patients With Crohn's Disease: a Pilot Study Involving a Multidimensional Assessment of Potential Mechanisms

This study evaluates the effect of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) in addition to different regimes of corticosteroid (CS) therapy (Prednisone) compared to CS alone in adults participants with active Crohn's Disease, on symptoms and inflammation after 6 weeks of treatment. Participants will be randomized to three treatment arms: standard CS, standard CS with EEN, short course CS with EEN. Participants will be assessed through questionnaires for gut symptoms, quality of life, mood changes and dietary patterns and potential mechanisms will be investigated by collecting stool samples for characterization of gut bacterial profiles, collection of blood to determine inflammatory markers and evaluation of gut motility before and after treatment. The investigators hypothesize that six weeks of EEN with CS will be more effective than CS alone in inducing clinical remission in patients with active CD, as well as leading to beneficial changes in the composition and/or metabolic activity of the intestinal microbiota, gastrointestinal transit and inflammatory burden. Furthermore, six weeks of EEN in addition to a short course of CS will have similar efficacy than EEN with standard course of CS and reduced number of adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain and bleeding. There are several treatment options but the most-widely used for acute therapy are corticosteroids (CS), however, CS are often associated with severe side effects. The administration of a formula for exclusive feeding (EEN) is well-established as an alternative to CS in children with Crohn's disease (CD). EEN has been proposed to reduce inflammation in the gut. However, this intervention is not routinely used in adults, in part because of uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the benefit of EEN reported in previous studies. Although few studies have examined the effects of EEN in adult patients with active CD, the potentially synergistic effects of adding EEN to the conventional CS was not explored. Furthermore, it is also possible that the addition of EEN allows to decrease the duration of CS therapy; however, this was not investigated before.

The investigators propose that an oral formula may help decrease gut inflammation and improve nutritional status through modulation of gut bacteria. The investigators will therefore evaluate the effect of exclusive formula feeding therapy in addition to different regimes of CS therapy compared to CS alone in adult patients with active CD, on symptoms and inflammation after 6 weeks of treatment. Participants will be randomized to three treatment arms: standard CS, standard CS with EEN, short course CS with EEN. The investigators will collect information through questionnaires that assess gut symptoms, quality of life, mood changes and dietary patterns. To investigate potential mechanisms, the investigators will collect stool samples to characterize gut bacterial profiles, blood to determine inflammatory markers and evaluate gut movements (motility) before, and after the treatment. The investigators hope that the results will lead to better understanding of the beneficial effect of exclusive formula feeding in addition to CS as a more efficacious alternative than CS alone, and to understand the mechanisms of this therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, ON, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
        • McMaster University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed CD for at least 6 months
  • Clinically active disease (CDAI >220 or Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) >6) or active by endoscopy.
  • Biochemical evidence of disease activity (CRP >5 and/or fecal calprotectin >250)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently using EEN
  • Condition that would preclude the use of EEN, such as Intestinal obstruction, perforation, toxic megacolon, massive gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal abscess, or stricturing disease
  • Previous intestinal resection with a remnant bowel of less than 180 cm
  • Treatment with Prednisone in the last 30 days
  • New start or change in dose of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, cyclosporine, other immunosuppressant or biologics in the last 90 days. Doses of these medications must also remain unchanged for the duration of the study
  • New start or change in dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) in the last 30 days. 5ASA dose must remain unchanged for the duration of the study
  • Use of Antibiotics or Probiotics in the last 30 days
  • Pregnant or Lactating
  • Any serious illness which could interfere with study procedures or results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard course CS with Regular Food
40 mg a day of oral Prednisone for 2 weeks with subsequent taper of daily dose by 5 mg per week.
All 3 arms will receive Prednisone - 2 will be standard course treatment, 1 will be short course and rapidly-tapered
Experimental: Standard course CS with EEN
40 mg a day of oral Prednisone for 2 weeks and taper of daily dose by 5 mg per week and Exclusive Enteral Nutrition for 6 weeks.
All 3 arms will receive Prednisone - 2 will be standard course treatment, 1 will be short course and rapidly-tapered
2 arms will receive EEN, in concurrence with either regular-course or short course and rapidly-tapered CS.
Other Names:
  • Modulen (Nestlé)
Experimental: Short course CS with EEN
40 mg a day of oral Prednisone for 3 days and taper of daily dose by 5 mg every 3 days and Exclusive Enteral Nutrition for 6 weeks.
All 3 arms will receive Prednisone - 2 will be standard course treatment, 1 will be short course and rapidly-tapered
2 arms will receive EEN, in concurrence with either regular-course or short course and rapidly-tapered CS.
Other Names:
  • Modulen (Nestlé)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of 6 weeks of EEN and CS in inducing remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index - CDAI<150) in adult patients with active CD (CDAI>220 and either CRP>5 or fecal calprotectin >250mg/l)
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess the efficacy of 6 weeks of EEN and CS in inducing remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)<150) compared to treatment with CS alone in adult patients with active CD (CDAI>220 and either CRP>5 or fecal calprotectin >250mg/l)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in inducing clinical disease improvement
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in inducing clinical disease improvement (drop in Crohns Disease Activity Index - CDAI>70)
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in improving quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in improving quality of life (Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ)) Total score ranges from 10 to 70 (higher values indicate better outcome). Subscales are divided into systemic (score range 2 to 14), social (score range 2 to 14), bowel (score range 3 to 21) and emotional (score range 3 to 21)
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in inducing biochemical remission
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in inducing biochemical remission (normalization of either serum CRP (CRP<5) and/or fecal calprotectin (less than 250mg/l)
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in normalizing colonic transit
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in normalizing colonic transit (SHAPE) among those with altered transit at baseline. Participants will take one capsule containing 24 markers and have an X-Ray done on day 5. If >20% markers (6 markers or more) are retained it is considered delayed transit.
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in decreasing anxiety and/or depression scores
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in decreasing anxiety and/or depression scores (decrease >2 points in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 42, lower values indicating better outcome. Subscale HAD-A (anxiety) and HAD-D (depression) range from 0 to 21.
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in increasing body weight and improving nutritional status
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in increasing body weight and improving nutritional status (increased levels of micronutrients: vitamin A, vitamin B12, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, chromium, copper and zinc)
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in decreasing number of adverse events
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in decreasing number of adverse events
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in inducing changes in microbiota composition
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in inducing changes in microbiota composition (change in alpha diversity by 16S sequencing Illumina)
2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in decreasing indirect markers of mucosal integrity
Time Frame: 2 years
Determine the beneficial effect of 6 weeks of EEN and CS as compared to CS alone in decreasing indirect markers of mucosal integrity (IFABP2)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria I Pinto-Sanchez, MD, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EEN in Crohn

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn's Disease

Clinical Trials on Prednisone

Search Similar Trials