Comparative Multicenter Randomized Study of Aflibercept Versus Placebo in Macular Telangiectasia Type 1 (TELeMAC)

January 23, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Idiopathic juxtafoveal telangiectasia type 1 is a rare unilateral disease that mostly affects men before 50 years of age. Mac Tel 1 are characterized by microvascular telangiectasia and increased tortuosity of the macular capillary network on the temporal part of the fovea that can be identified on fundus examination. It can be associated with peripheral vascular changes, similar to manifestations of Coats' disease. It can be complicated by macular edema due to leakage from microvascular ectasia. When associated with visual loss, macular edema can be treated with different strategies although there is no consensus about the best approach. Laser can be performed on leaky aneurysms with questionable long term efficacy and potential irreversible adverse effects. Recently, anti-VEGF agents have been put forward as particularly good candidates to treat this macular edema, as observed in vein occlusion or diabetic macular edema. Indeed, in limited case series, the first anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab and bevacizumab) showed mitigated results. More recently, authors have reported some favorable results with aflibercept in patients refractory to other anti-VEGF agents. Indeed a recent study reported both good anatomical and functional results in macular edema due to Mac Tel 1 in a non-comparative study that included 8 patients and carried out a concomitant quantification of growth factors. As an explanation, the authors found that levels of placental growth factor (PlGF), which is targeted by aflibercept but not by other anti-VEGF agents, were decreased after treatment. Moreover, PlGF correlated with capillary plexus densities assessed by OCTA. The aim of this study is thus to assess the efficacy of a 6 months treatment by aflibercept compared to placebo in macular edema linked to Mac Tel 1 with a multicenter double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • CHU Dijon Bourgogne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who have given their written informed consent
  • Patient major
  • Patient with idiopathic macular telangiectasia type 1 identified at least 4 months previously, with or without peripheral exudative abnormalities
  • Patient with macular edema more than 320 μm confirmed by a blind review of SD-OCT images
  • Patient with best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity between strictly24 and 79 letters
  • Patient meeting at least 1 of the following criteria:
  • Patient naive to any treatment
  • Patient with a contraindication for laser photocoagulation
  • Patient with persistence of macular edema after treatment with anti-VEGF (including aflibercept) administered more than 4 months previously
  • Patient with persistence of macular edema after laser photocoagulation treatment more than 4 months previously
  • Patient with persistence of macular edema after treatment with corticosteroids administered more than 6 months previously
  • Patient with an assessment by the treating ophthalmologist that focal coagulation (for both groups) and anti-VEGF treatment (for the placebo group) could be safely deferred for 6 months
  • Woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP)* must commit to consider and use an efficient method of birth control during the trial and at least 3 months after the last aflibercept/SHAM administration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient not affiliated to a national health insurance scheme
  • Patient subject to a measure of legal protection (guardianship, tutorship)
  • Patient subject to a court order
  • Patient pregnant, parturient or nursing women (WOCBP)*
  • Patient incapable of expressing consent
  • Patient with edema linked to conditions other than macular telangiectasia (namely retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, ocular ischemic syndrome, sickle-cell anemia, maculopathy, hypertensive retinopathy…)
  • Patient presenting any cardiovascular eventwithin 6 months before inclusion
  • Poor media clarity, which can prevent adequate fundus imaging
  • Patient with hypersensitivity to the active substance (aflibercept) or to any of the excipients of EYLEA®
  • Patient with active or suspected ocular or periocular infection or severe active intraocular inflammation.
  • Any history of allergy to the antiseptic used during preparation of the eye for the IVT injection in the investigational site (e.g. povidone iodine or chlorhexidine).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: control group
Other: Inclusion examinations
Pregnancy test, Visual acuity, ocular pressure, color retinophotography, OCT-SD (the Heidelberg SDOCT Spectralis, or the Cirrus HD-OCT, model 5000, Zeiss), OCT-angiography and fluorescein angiography and wide-field angiogram
Other: Examinations during study (every month)
visual acuity, ocular pressure, OCT-SD, OCT-angiography and ocular fundus and a pregnancy test at M6
Drug: SHAM injection
Intravitreal injection of SHAM at inclusion, M1, M2, M3 and M4. An additional injection may be planned for M5, on the decision of the clinician and on clinical arguments only.
Experimental: group aflibercept
Other: Inclusion examinations
Pregnancy test, Visual acuity, ocular pressure, color retinophotography, OCT-SD (the Heidelberg SDOCT Spectralis, or the Cirrus HD-OCT, model 5000, Zeiss), OCT-angiography and fluorescein angiography and wide-field angiogram
Drug: Aflibercept Injection [Eylea]
Intravitreal injection of aflibercept at inclusion, M1, M2, M3 and M4. An additional injection may be planned for M5, on the decision of the clinician and on clinical arguments only.
Other: Examinations during study (every month)
visual acuity, ocular pressure, OCT-SD, OCT-angiography and ocular fundus and a pregnancy test at M6

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in central retinal thickness (CRT)
Time Frame: Between M0 and M6
Between M0 and M6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 26, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 26, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CREUZOT PHRC N 2017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings