Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft to Improve Postprostatectomy Incontinence and Potency

March 5, 2019 updated by: Dimitri Barski, German Centre for Assessment and Evaluation of Innovative Techniques in Medicine

Randomized Pilot Study to Improve Postprostatectomy Incontinence and Potency by Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft

The investigators present a randomized trial of patients undergoing placement of dehydrated human amnion membrane (dHAM) around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in a tertiary center in Germany.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients suffer under incontinence and impotence after RRP, improving techniques and studies are missing. The human amniotic membrane includes growth factors and unique immune tolerance which can improve tissue regeneration. The preliminary studies could prove the potential value of dHAM in the reconstruction of the urinary tract and nerve protection. The investigators initially present a randomized trial to improve postoperative continence and potency of patients undergoing placement of dehydrated human amnion membrane (dHAM) around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during RRP for the treatment of prostate cancer. RRP is performed in a standardized way by one experienced surgeon. The patients are randomized 1:1 to dHAM vs. placebo and blinded during the study period. The primary outcome is a postoperative continence measure as 24hrs pad test up to 12mos postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are potency, insufficiency of VUA, postoperative complications and biochemical recurrence. Using the T-test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% and expecting a drop-out of 20% of the patients, an adjusted sample size per arm of 164 patients is required.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
328

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Neuss, Germany, 40464
        • Department of Urology, Lukas Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with localized prostate cancer
  • indication for radical prostatectomy
  • no other treatment of prostate cancer
  • availability to informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • preoperative incontinence (24hrs pad-test)
  • preoperative erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5 < 20)
  • metastasized or locally advanced prostate cancer in preoperative assessment
  • previous radiation of pelvis
  • previous prostate cancer therapy
  • psychiatric disease
  • participation at another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: dHAM
dHAM wrap is placed during RRP.
Drug: dHAM
A dehydrated human amnion membrane (dHAM, 1x3cm) is placed around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) on the left and right side and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
Placebo Comparator: Standard
A standard RRP is performed.
Drug: No dHAM
A standard radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) without dHAM is performed (Walsh, 2005).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 weeks after surgery
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 weeks after surgery
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 months after surgery
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 months after surgery
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 12 months after surgery
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in erectile function (EF)
Time Frame: From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
EF is assessed by IIEF-5 (the International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire.
From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
Change in erectile function (EF)
Time Frame: From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 3 months after surgery
EF is assessed by IIEF-5 (the International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire.
From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 3 months after surgery
Change in erectile function (EF)
Time Frame: From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 12 months after surgery
EF is assessed by IIEF-5 (the International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire.
From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 12 months after surgery
Postoperative catheter removal
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time of postoperative catheter removal (days)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Complications
Time Frame: perioperative, at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
Complications are assessed according to Clavien-Dindo classification.
perioperative, at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
Biochemical recurrence
Time Frame: at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
Measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)
at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
German Centre for Assessment and Evaluation of Innovative Techniques in Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dimitri Barski, PhD, Department of Urology, Lukas Hospital Neuss

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HAM01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings