- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03864939
Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft to Improve Postprostatectomy Incontinence and Potency
March 5, 2019 updated by: Dimitri Barski, German Centre for Assessment and Evaluation of Innovative Techniques in Medicine
Randomized Pilot Study to Improve Postprostatectomy Incontinence and Potency by Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft
The investigators present a randomized trial of patients undergoing placement of dehydrated human amnion membrane (dHAM) around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in a tertiary center in Germany.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients suffer under incontinence and impotence after RRP, improving techniques and studies are missing.
The human amniotic membrane includes growth factors and unique immune tolerance which can improve tissue regeneration.
The preliminary studies could prove the potential value of dHAM in the reconstruction of the urinary tract and nerve protection.
The investigators initially present a randomized trial to improve postoperative continence and potency of patients undergoing placement of dehydrated human amnion membrane (dHAM) around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during RRP for the treatment of prostate cancer.
RRP is performed in a standardized way by one experienced surgeon.
The patients are randomized 1:1 to dHAM vs. placebo and blinded during the study period.
The primary outcome is a postoperative continence measure as 24hrs pad test up to 12mos postoperatively.
Secondary outcomes are potency, insufficiency of VUA, postoperative complications and biochemical recurrence.
Using the T-test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% and expecting a drop-out of 20% of the patients, an adjusted sample size per arm of 164 patients is required.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
328
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Dimitri Barski, PhD
- Phone Number: 004921318882401
- Email: dbarski@lukasneuss.de
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Thomas Otto, Prof
- Phone Number: 004921318882401
- Email: totto@lukasneuss.de
Study Locations
-
-
-
Neuss, Germany, 40464
- Department of Urology, Lukas Hospital
-
Contact:
- Dimitri Barski, PhD
- Phone Number: 004921318882401
- Email: dbarski@lukasneuss.de
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Male
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with localized prostate cancer
- indication for radical prostatectomy
- no other treatment of prostate cancer
- availability to informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- preoperative incontinence (24hrs pad-test)
- preoperative erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5 < 20)
- metastasized or locally advanced prostate cancer in preoperative assessment
- previous radiation of pelvis
- previous prostate cancer therapy
- psychiatric disease
- participation at another study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: dHAM
dHAM wrap is placed during RRP.
|
A dehydrated human amnion membrane (dHAM, 1x3cm) is placed around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) on the left and right side and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
|
Placebo Comparator: Standard
A standard RRP is performed.
|
A standard radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) without dHAM is performed (Walsh, 2005).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 weeks after surgery
|
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
|
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 weeks after surgery
|
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
|
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
|
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
|
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 months after surgery
|
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
|
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 3 months after surgery
|
Change in urine loss
Time Frame: From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
Urine loss is assessed by 24 hrs pad-test (in gram)
|
From baseline (1 week after surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in erectile function (EF)
Time Frame: From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
|
EF is assessed by IIEF-5 (the International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire.
|
From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 6 weeks after surgery
|
Change in erectile function (EF)
Time Frame: From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 3 months after surgery
|
EF is assessed by IIEF-5 (the International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire.
|
From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 3 months after surgery
|
Change in erectile function (EF)
Time Frame: From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
EF is assessed by IIEF-5 (the International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire.
|
From baseline (4 weeks before surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
Postoperative catheter removal
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Time of postoperative catheter removal (days)
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Complications
Time Frame: perioperative, at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
|
Complications are assessed according to Clavien-Dindo classification.
|
perioperative, at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
|
Biochemical recurrence
Time Frame: at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
|
Measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)
|
at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dimitri Barski, PhD, Department of Urology, Lukas Hospital Neuss
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Abrams P, Andersson KE, Apostolidis A, Birder L, Bliss D, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Castro-Diaz D, O'Connell PR, Cottenden A, Cotterill N, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Dumoulin C, Fader M, Fry C, Goldman H, Hanno P, Homma Y, Khullar V, Maher C, Milsom I, Newman D, Nijman RJM, Rademakers K, Robinson D, Rosier P, Rovner E, Salvatore S, Takeda M, Wagg A, Wagner T, Wein A; members of the committees. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AND FAECAL INCONTINENCE. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Sep;37(7):2271-2272. doi: 10.1002/nau.23551. Epub 2018 Aug 14. No abstract available.
- Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Galfano A, Bocciardi AM, Vespasiani G, Spera E, Gaston R. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Critical appraisal of the anatomic landmarks for a complete intrafascial approach. Clin Anat. 2015 Oct;28(7):896-902. doi: 10.1002/ca.22576. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
- Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, Varga G, Boros M, Pintelon I, Timmermans JP, Otto T. Human Amniotic Membrane Is Not Suitable for the Grafting of Colon Lesions and Prevention of Adhesions in a Xenograft Rat Model. Surg Innov. 2017 Aug;24(4):313-320. doi: 10.1177/1553350617709828. Epub 2017 May 26.
- Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, Varga G, Boros M, Pintelon I, Timmermans JP, Otto T. Human amniotic membrane dressing for the treatment of an infected wound due to an entero-cutaneous fistula: Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;51:11-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
- Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, Varga G, Boros M, Pintelon I, Timmermans JP, Winter A, Bagner JW, Otto T. Repair of a vesico-vaginal fistula with amniotic membrane - Step 1 of the IDEAL recommendations of surgical innovation. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(4):459-61. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.683. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
- Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, Yang J, Varga G, Boros M, Pintelon I, Timmermans JP, Otto T. Bladder Reconstruction with Human Amniotic Membrane in a Xenograft Rat Model: A Preclinical Study. Int J Med Sci. 2017 Mar 11;14(4):310-318. doi: 10.7150/ijms.18127. eCollection 2017.
- Capogrosso P, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Review. World J Mens Health. 2016 Aug;34(2):73-88. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2016.34.2.73. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
- D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ, Wein A. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.969.
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Lemke A, Ferguson J, Gross K, Penzenstadler C, Bradl M, Mayer RL, Gerner C, Redl H, Wolbank S. Transplantation of human amnion prevents recurring adhesions and ameliorates fibrosis in a rat model of sciatic nerve scarring. Acta Biomater. 2018 Jan 15;66:335-349. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.042. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
- Ogaya-Pinies G, Kadakia Y, Palayapalayam-Ganapathi H, Woodlief T, Jenson C, Syed J, Patel V. Use of Scaffolding Tissue Biografts To Bolster Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Salvage Robot-assisted Prostatectomy Reduces Leak Rates and Catheter Times. Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
- Ogaya-Pinies G, Palayapalam-Ganapathi H, Rogers T, Hernandez-Cardona E, Rocco B, Coelho RF, Jenson C, Patel VR. Can dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane accelerate the return to potency after a nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? Propensity score-matched analysis. J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0719-8. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
- Patel VR, Samavedi S, Bates AS, Kumar A, Coelho R, Rocco B, Palmer K. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft Nerve Wrap Around the Prostatic Neurovascular Bundle Accelerates Early Return to Continence and Potency Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):977-980. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
- Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0.
- Walsh PC. Re: Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: detailed description of the surgical technique. J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):324. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000148246.73337.ad. No abstract available.
- Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, Boros M, Brune J, Beutner U, Tsaur I, Ramon A, Otto T. Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft to Improve Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence and Potency: A Randomized Exploration Study Protocol. Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):592-602. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01158-3. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
April 1, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
April 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 5, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 5, 2019
Last Verified
March 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HAM01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Complication
-
Asst Melegnano e MartesanaEnrolling by invitationMortality | Nephrotoxicity | Respiratory Complication | Neurological Complication | Surgical Complication | Metabolic Complication | Cardiovascular ComplicationItaly
-
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech RepublicCompletedPulmonary Complication | Cardiovascular ComplicationCzechia
-
Eske Kvanner AasvangCompletedComplication of Surgical Procedure | Respiratory Complication | Complication of Anesthesia | Circulatory; ComplicationsDenmark
-
Medical University of GdanskUniversity Clinical Centre, Gdansk; EIT HealthRecruitingCardiac Complication | Perioperative ComplicationPoland
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingMechanical Ventilation Complication | Anesthesia ComplicationEgypt
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRecruitingIntubation Complication | Laryngeal Mask ComplicationBelgium
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterCompletedMechanical Ventilation Complication | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationUnited States
-
Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA); University... and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgery | Mechanical Ventilation Complication | Pulmonary ComplicationSpain, Germany, Netherlands
-
Hannover Medical SchoolRecruitingComplication of Surgical Procedure | Complication,Postoperative | Complication of Anesthesia | Complication of Medical CareGermany
-
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación...UnknownAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationSpain