Naproxen Sodium/Acetaminophen Proof of Concept Dosing Study

November 9, 2022 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo And Active Controlled, Study To Evaluate Two Strengths Of Concomitantly Dosed Naproxen Sodium With Acetaminophen, Compared With Naproxen Sodium and Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen In Postoperative Dental Pain

Study assessing efficacy and safety of concomitantly dosed naproxen sodium with acetaminophen, compared with naproxen sodium, hydrocodone/acetaminophen and Placebo in a postoperative dental pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of concomitantly administered naproxen sodium 440 mg with acetaminophen 1000 mg and concomitantly administered naproxen sodium 220 mg with acetaminophen 650 mg, compared with a fixed combination of hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 650 mg, naproxen sodium 440 mg, and placebo over a twelve-hour period after surgical extraction of four third molars.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
290

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Jean Brown Research Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males of females 17-50 years old
  2. Weigh 100 pounds or greater and have a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 to 35 (inclusive) at screening
  3. Surgical removal of up to four third molars, of which, two must be mandibular impactions
  4. Meets requirements for post -surgical pain level
  5. Females of childbearing potential and males agree to contraceptive requirements of study
  6. Have a negative urine drug screen at screening, and on day of surgical procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant female, breastfeeding, trying to become pregnant or male with pregnant partner or partner currently trying to become pregnant
  2. Have known allergy or hypersensitivity to naproxen or other NSAIDS, including aspirin, or to acetaminophen, tramadol, hydrocodone or other opioids
  3. Not able to swallow large tablets or capsules
  4. History of any condition (s) in investigator's opinion, may jeopardize subject safety, well-being and integrity of study
  5. Use analgesics 5 or more times per week
  6. History of chronic tranquilizer use, heavy drinking, substance abuse as judged by investigator site staff within last 5 years
  7. Use of immunosuppressive drugs within 2 weeks of screening
  8. History of peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding in the last two years or hematologic bleeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 440 mg naproxen sodium with 1000 mg acetaminophen
440 mg naproxen sodium with 1000 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of two naproxen sodium 220 mg tablets and two acetaminophen 500 mg tablets
Drug: 440 mg naproxen sodium with 1000 mg acetaminophen
440 mg naproxen sodium with 1000 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of two naproxen sodium 220 mg tablets and two acetaminophen 500 mg tablets
Other Names:
  • Naproxen Sodium with Acetaminophen - High Dose
Experimental: 220 mg naproxen sodium with 650 mg acetaminophen
220 mg naproxen sodium with 650 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of one naproxen sodium 220 mg tablet and two acetaminophen 325 mg tablets and one placebo tablet
Drug: 220 mg naproxen sodium with 650 mg acetaminophen
220 mg naproxen sodium with 650 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of one naproxen sodium 220 mg tablet and two acetaminophen 325 mg tablets and one placebo tablet
Other Names:
  • Naproxen Sodium with Acetaminophen - Low Dose
Active Comparator: 10 mg hydrocodone + 650 mg acetaminophen
10 mg hydrocodone + 650 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of two hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg tablets and two placebo tablets
Drug: 10 mg hydrocodone + 650 mg acetaminophen
10 mg hydrocodone with 650 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of two hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg tablets and two placebo tablets
Other Names:
  • Commercial Hydrocodone + Acetaminophen Tablet
Active Comparator: 440 mg naproxen sodium
440 mg naproxen sodium administered as a single dose of two naproxen sodium 220 mg tablets and two placebo tablets
Drug: 440 mg naproxen sodium
440 mg naproxen sodium administered as a single dose of two naproxen sodium 220 mg tablets and two placebo tablets
Other Names:
  • Naproxen sodium
Placebo Comparator: Placebo tablet
Single dose of four placebo tablets
Drug: Placebo tablet
Single dose of four placebo tablets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Score From Baseline (0 Hour) to 6 Hours (SPID 0-6)
Time Frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 6 hours post-dose
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) score was measured using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). The possible range of SPID for 0-6 hours was from -60 to 60. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. PID was the difference between baseline pain intensity and pain intensity at assessment. Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point and adding these time-weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0 to 6 hours.
Baseline (0 hour) up to 6 hours post-dose
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Score From Baseline (0 Hour) to 12 Hours (SPID 0-12)
Time Frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference score was measured using a PI-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). The possible range of SPID for 0-12 hours was from -120 to 120. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. PID was the difference between baseline pain intensity and pain intensity at assessment (12 hours). Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point and adding these time-weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0 to 12 hours.
Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-Weighted Sum of Total Pain Relief Score From Baseline (0 Hour) to 6 Hours (TOTPAR 0-6)
Time Frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 6 hours post-dose
Time-weighted total pain relief (TOTPAR) was measured using a Pain Relief Numerical Rating Scale (PR-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no relief, 10 = complete relief). Total pain relief scores (TOTPARs) were calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each postdose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The minimum value was 0, and the maximum value was 60. Higher scores was indicative of more pain relief.
Baseline (0 hour) up to 6 hours post-dose
Time-Weighted Sum of Total Pain Relief Score From Baseline (0 Hour) to 8 Hours (TOTPAR 0-8)
Time Frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 8 hours post-dose
TOTPAR was measured using a PR-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no relief, 10 = complete relief). Total pain relief scores (TOTPARs) were calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each postdose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The minimum value was 0, and the maximum value was 80. Higher scores was indicative of more pain relief.
Baseline (0 hour) up to 8 hours post-dose
Time-Weighted Sum of Total Pain Relief Score From Baseline (0 Hour) to 12 Hours (TOTPAR 0-12)
Time Frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
TOTPAR was measured using a PR-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no relief, 10 = complete relief). Total pain relief scores (TOTPARs) were calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each postdose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The minimum value was 0, and the maximum value was 120. Higher scores was indicative of more pain relief.
Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
Time-Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Score From Baseline (0 Hour) to 8 Hours (SPID 0-8)
Time Frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 8 hours post-dose
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference score was measured using a PI-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). The possible range of SPID for 0-8 hours was from -80 to 80. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. PID was the difference between baseline pain intensity and pain intensity at assessment (8 hours). Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point and adding these time-weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0 to 8 hours.
Baseline (0 hour) up to 8 hours post-dose
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at Individual Timepoints
Time Frame: 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 0.75 hours, 1 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, and 12 hours
Participants answered a question at individual time points: "how much relief do you have from your starting pain?" on a 11-point PR-NRS. Scale ranged from 0=no relief to 10=complete relief. Higher score indicated improvement in pain.
0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 0.75 hours, 1 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, and 12 hours
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Scores at Individual Time Points
Time Frame: 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 0.75 hours, 1 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, and 12 hours
Pain Intensity was self-reported over 12 hours, using a pain rating of 0-10 on the PI-NRS, with score ranged from 0-10 (0= no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Pain intensity differences were calculated with respect to baseline at each time point after study drug administration.
0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 0.75 hours, 1 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, and 12 hours
Participant's Global Evaluation of Study Medication OR Overall Impression of Study Medication According to Participant's Global Evaluation
Time Frame: Up to 12 hours
Participants were asked to rate their overall impression of the study medication using the following scale: poor (0), fair (1), good (2), very good (3), and excellent (4) where higher score represented better outcome.
Up to 12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Todd Bertoch, MD, Jean Brown Research (JBR)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 7, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 13, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CCSPAA001068

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings