Effect of Oxyflower® Gel as a Coadjuvant in Pericoronitis Treatment

November 8, 2022 updated by: Federal University of the Valleys of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri

Effect of Oxyflower® Gel as a Coadjuvant in Pericoronitis Treatment: Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effect and the impact on the quality of life of the coadjuvant treatment with Oxyflower® gel in cases of pericoronitis in lower third molar, compared to chlorhexidine gel and placebo gel.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study consist of 51 participants diagnosed with pericoronitis who received coadjuvant treatment with gel. The participants were submitted to emergency treatment, with local debridement and irrigation with saline solution followed by topical application of the randomized gel: oxyflower®, chlorhexidine, or placebo gel. In cases of pericoronitis with systemic signs / symptoms, such as fever, malaise and lymphadenopathy, systemic antibiotic therapy was prescribed one hour before debridement, lasting seven days. All participants received oral hygiene guidelines and were instructed to apply the same gel twice daily for one week . After 30 days, it was performed tooth removal for cases in which there is not enough space for dental eruption; or distal wedge surgery when there is space for dental eruption with excessive gingiva in the distal. It was evaluated as outcomes: pain, quality of life, depth of probing, level of bone crest in the distal of second molar, buccal opening and extent of edema / erythema. A comparative analysis was performed between the groups, before and after treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
51

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Minas Gerais
      • Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 39100000
        • Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 31 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signs / symptoms of pericoronitis with
  • spontaneous pain
  • ASA I or II
  • Consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Periodontal status level IV
  • Smokers
  • antibiotic therapy in the last 2 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: OxyFlower gel
pericoronitis treatment with oxyflower gel.
Other: OxyFlower gel
the region with pericoronitis was debrided using gauze and curettes, with copious irrigation with sterile saline solution. At this moment, the gel was applied topically under the pericoronal hood, with a standard volume of 2microIiters, using a dosing syringe. Then, participants received instructions on oral hygiene and how to use the gel at home, twice a day for one week. After 30 days, it was performed third molar removal or distal wedge removal
Experimental: Chlorhexidine gel
pericoronitis treatment with chlorhexidine gel.
Other: Chlorhexidine gel
the region with pericoronitis was debrided using gauze and curettes, with copious irrigation with sterile saline solution. At this moment, the gel was applied topically under the pericoronal hood, with a standard volume of 2microIiters, using a dosing syringe. Then, participants received instructions on oral hygiene and how to use the gel at home, twice a day for one week. After 30 days, it was performed third molar removal or distal wedge removal.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo gel
pericoronitis treatment with placebo gel.
Other: Placebo gel
the region with pericoronitis was debrided using gauze and curettes, with copious irrigation with sterile saline solution. At this moment, the gel was applied topically under the pericoronal hood, with a standard volume of 2microIiters, using a dosing syringe. Then, participants received instructions on oral hygiene and how to use the gel at home, twice a day for one week. After 30 days, it was performed third molar removal or distal wedge removal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Quality of life
Time Frame: baseline, 30 days
Oral health related quality of life measured by questions related to the quality of life. This questionnaire comprises 14 items within 7 subscales (functional limitation, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, deficit).
baseline, 30 days
Change from Baseline Pain
Time Frame: baseline, 1,3,7,15 and 30 days
Post-operative pain measured by visual analogic scale (VAS). The VAS comprises a 10cm horizontal line, with no marks. When responding to a VAS, subjects specify their level of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
baseline, 1,3,7,15 and 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline trismus
Time Frame: baseline, 1,3,7,15 and 30 days
maximum mouth opening measured as maximum distance between incisal edges of upper and lower central incisors.
baseline, 1,3,7,15 and 30 days
change from edema / erythema
Time Frame: baseline, 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days
The extent of edema / erythema was assessed by measuring the greater vestibulo-lingual and mesio-distal distance of the lesion, by periodontal probe.
baseline, 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of the Valleys of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Patricia F Gonçalves, PhD, Federal University of the Valleys of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16042019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings