Chilean Maternal & Infant Cohort Study II (CHiMINCs-II) (CHiMINCs-II)
The Chilean Maternal and Infant Nutrition Cohort Study II
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Puente Alto
-
Santiago de Chile, Puente Alto, Chile, 8210269
- Corporación de Salud Municipal de Puente Alto
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 or more years of age
- Gestation <15 weeks at first prenatal visit
- No intention to move outside the city of Santiago in the next to years
Exclusion Criteria:
- High-risk pregnancy (i.e., preeclampsia, pre- existing diabetes)
- Pre-existing cancer or family history of breast cancer
- Intended to migrate from the public to the private health care system
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Mother-infant dyads
|
Altered metabolic milieu is defined as a fasting glucose level >100 mg/dL at the first trimester of pregnancy by national guidelines.
Altered metabolic milieu during the second trimester (24-28 weeks of pregnancy) is defined as a fasting glucose levels > 92 mg/dL and/or plasma glucose levels > 153 mg/dL two hours after load in the oral glucose tolerance test according to ADA guidelines or a fasting glucose >100 mg/dL and/or > 140 mg/dL two hours after load in the oral glucose tolerance test according to national guidelines.
The COVID-19 pandemic is considered as a natural nutritional and mental health exposure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Breast absolute (AFGV) fibro-glandular volume measured by DXA technique
Time Frame: Three months after breastfeeding cessation
|
cm3
|
Three months after breastfeeding cessation
|
|
Breast absolute percentage (%FVG) of fibro-glandular volume measured by DXA technique
Time Frame: Three months after breastfeeding cessation
|
percentage
|
Three months after breastfeeding cessation
|
|
Gestational weight gain
Time Frame: At delivery
|
kg
|
At delivery
|
|
Gestational Diabetes
Time Frame: At delivery
|
Percentage of mothers diagnosed
|
At delivery
|
|
Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
Time Frame: Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
Score
|
Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
|
Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale
Time Frame: Through the gestation, up to 6 months
|
Score
|
Through the gestation, up to 6 months
|
|
Glucose concentration
Time Frame: Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
mg/dL
|
Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
|
Insulin concentration
Time Frame: Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
uIU/mL
|
Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
|
Pandemic Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
Score
|
Through the gestation, up the delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Offspring weight
Time Frame: At 6 months of age
|
g
|
At 6 months of age
|
|
Offspring length
Time Frame: At 6 months of age
|
cm
|
At 6 months of age
|
|
Offspring head circumference
Time Frame: At 6 months of age
|
cm
|
At 6 months of age
|
|
Offspring body fat
Time Frame: At 6 months of age
|
Percentage
|
At 6 months of age
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: María L Garmendia, PhD, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de Alimentos
- Principal Investigator: Camila L Corvalán Aguilar, PhD, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile, Chile
- Principal Investigator: María F Mujica Coopman, PhD, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile, Chile
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 18;356(3):227-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790.
- McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1159-69. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034.
- Boyd N, Berman H, Zhu J, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Chavez S, Stanisz G, Hislop G, Chiarelli AM, Minkin S, Paterson AD. The origins of breast cancer associated with mammographic density: a testable biological hypothesis. Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Mar 7;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0941-y.
- Li T, Sun L, Miller N, Nicklee T, Woo J, Hulse-Smith L, Tsao MS, Khokha R, Martin L, Boyd N. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Feb;14(2):343-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0490.
- Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Tritchler D, Chiarelli A, Yaffe MJ, Hopper JL. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 19;347(12):886-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013390.
- Varghese JS, Thompson DJ, Michailidou K, Lindstrom S, Turnbull C, Brown J, Leyland J, Warren RM, Luben RN, Loos RJ, Wareham NJ, Rommens J, Paterson AD, Martin LJ, Vachon CM, Scott CG, Atkinson EJ, Couch FJ, Apicella C, Southey MC, Stone J, Li J, Eriksson L, Czene K, Boyd NF, Hall P, Hopper JL, Tamimi RM; MODE Consortium; Rahman N, Easton DF. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer: evidence of a shared genetic basis. Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 15;72(6):1478-84. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3295. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
- Nazari SS, Mukherjee P. An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2018 May;25(3):259-267. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0857-5. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
- Rice MS, Rosner BA, Tamimi RM. Percent mammographic density prediction: development of a model in the nurses' health studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Jul;28(7):677-684. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0898-7. Epub 2017 May 6.
- Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Bertrand KA, Tamimi RM. Reproductive factors related to childbearing and mammographic breast density. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;158(2):351-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3884-y. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
- Rice MS, Bertrand KA, Lajous M, Tamimi RM, Torres G, Lopez-Ridaura R, Romieu I. Reproductive and lifestyle risk factors and mammographic density in Mexican women. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):868-73. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
- Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):187-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09454-0.
- Gabrielson M, Chiesa F, Behmer C, Ronnow K, Czene K, Hall P. Association of reproductive history with breast tissue characteristics and receptor status in the normal breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):487-497. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4768-0. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
- Britt K, Ashworth A, Smalley M. Pregnancy and the risk of breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007 Dec;14(4):907-33. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0137.
- Vashi R, Hooley R, Butler R, Geisel J, Philpotts L. Breast imaging of the pregnant and lactating patient: imaging modalities and pregnancy-associated breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb;200(2):321-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.12.9814.
- Sabate JM, Clotet M, Torrubia S, Gomez A, Guerrero R, de las Heras P, Lerma E. Radiologic evaluation of breast disorders related to pregnancy and lactation. Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S101-24. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075505.
- Loehberg CR, Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haeberle L, Hein A, Rauh C, Bani MR, Lux MP, Schrauder MG, Bayer CM, Helbig C, Grolik R, Adamietz B, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA. Assessment of mammographic density before and after first full-term pregnancy. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Nov;19(6):405-12. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833ca1f4.
- Strange KS, Wilkinson D, Edin G, Emerman JT. Mitogenic properties of insulin-like growth factors I and II, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and epidermal growth factor on human breast stromal cells in primary culture. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Mar;84(2):77-84. doi: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000018384.64326.dd.
- Rosato V, Bosetti C, Talamini R, Levi F, Montella M, Giacosa A, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Ann Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(12):2687-2692. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr025. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
- Agnoli C, Berrino F, Abagnato CA, Muti P, Panico S, Crosignani P, Krogh V. Metabolic syndrome and postmenopausal breast cancer in the ORDET cohort: a nested case-control study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Jan;20(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
- Buschard K, Thomassen K, Lynge E, Vejborg I, Tjonneland A, von Euler-Chelpin M, Andersen ZJ. Diabetes, diabetes treatment, and mammographic density in Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort. Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Jan;28(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0829-z. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
- Pereira A, Garmendia ML, Uauy R, Neira P, Lopez-Arana S, Malkov S, Shepherd J. Determinants of volumetric breast density in Chilean premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;162(2):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4126-7. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
- Chen YH, Ferguson KK, Meeker JD, McElrath TF, Mukherjee B. Statistical methods for modeling repeated measures of maternal environmental exposure biomarkers during pregnancy in association with preterm birth. Environ Health. 2015 Jan 26;14:9. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-14-9.
- Mujica-Coopman MF, Corvalan C, Flores M, Garmendia ML. The Chilean Maternal-Infant Cohort Study-II in the COVID-19 Era: A Study Protocol. Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;10:904668. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.904668. eCollection 2022.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1190532
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.