Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites (SEALBULK)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Rio de Janeiro
-
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 28625-650
- Universidade Federal Fluminense - School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients must have at only 20 teeth in function, must have at only 3 carious occlusal or proximo-occlusal lesions, or old restorations that need to be changed, in different teeth. Those lesions must be more than 2 mm deep, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel. Teeth should not present periodontal mobility.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Volunteers with periodontal disease; with gingival bleeding; use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 30 days.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Bulk without Surface Sealant
53 teeth will receive restorations using Bulk fill restoration without surface sealant
|
Adhese SE self-etch adhesive system will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions in 53 teeth.Then, the Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill composite will be used in increments of no more than 4 mm, using the bulk restoration technique, and each increment will be photoactivated for 40 seconds.
|
|
Experimental: Bulk with Biscover
53 teeth will receive restorations using Bulk fill restoration with Biscover surface sealant
|
Adhese SE self-etch adhesive system will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions in 53 teeth.Then, the Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill composite will be used in increments of no more than 4 mm, using the bulk restoration technique, and each increment will be photoactivated for 40 seconds.
After the restoration is completed, biscover surface sealant will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
|
|
Experimental: Bulk with Permaseal
53 teeth will receive restorations using Bulk fill restoration with Permaseal surface sealant
|
Adhese SE self-etch adhesive system will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions in 53 teeth.Then, the Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill composite will be used in increments of no more than 4 mm, using the bulk restoration technique, and each increment will be photoactivated for 40 seconds.
After the restoration is completed, Permaseal surface sealant will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Restoration Loss
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of losses of dental restorations in the period of five years, verified by periodic visual clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of remaining restorations in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal Pigmentation
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with marginal pigmentation in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
|
Post-Operative Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
|
Secondary Caries
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with secondary caries in the period of five years, verified by periodic radiographic examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with secondary caries in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: MARCOS O BARCELEIRO, DDS, PhD, Universidade Federal Fluminense
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003 Aug;31(6):437-44. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00121-5.
- Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
- Roggendorf MJ, Kramer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
- van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Feb;17(1):81-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33502.
- Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM, Colak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 May;8(2). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12210. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
- Costa T, Rezende M, Sakamoto A, Bittencourt B, Dalzochio P, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations. Oper Dent. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):143-154. doi: 10.2341/16-010-C. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
- Calazans FS, Ferreira TMJ, Naupari-Villasante R, Mendonca RP, Ornellas G, Albuquerque EG, Tardem C, de Miranda MS, Barceleiro MO, Loguercio AD. Influence of surface sealants on the quality of posterior restorations with bulk-fill composites: A 4-year randomized clinical trial. Dent Mater. 2024 Mar;40(3):466-476. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.011. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UFFBULKSEAL2018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.