Legend: TRELEGY Real World Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Effectiveness Study (LEGEND)

April 21, 2020 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Inhaled Triple Therapy (Fluticasone Furoate / Umeclidinium Bromide / Vilanterol) in a Single Inhaler (TRELEGY™ ELLIPTA™) With Inhaled Non-ELLIPTA™ Multiple Inhaler Triple Therapies in COPD Patients in the US Within a Usual Care Setting in a Prospective Pre-Post Study

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of TRELEGY ELLIPTA single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI]) relative to non-ELLIPTA multiple inhaler triple therapies (MITT) of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists/muscarinic receptor antagonists (ICS/LABA/LAMA) within a routine clinical practice setting. This is a non-randomized, interventional and self-controlled cohort study conducted to collect data in routine practice. This study will have two periods where in retrospective data will be collected in pre-switch period and prospective data will be collected in post-switch periods. Subjects will be switched from non-ELLIPTA MITT to TRELEGY ELLIPTA. The pre-switch period is of 52 weeks and post-switch period will be of 52 weeks. Additionally subjects will receive safety follow-up call at 26 weeks and 52 weeks for safety monitoring. Approximately 1300 subjects will be enrolled for this study. TRELEGY ELLIPTA is a registered trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) group of companies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Utah
      • Layton, Utah, United States, 84041
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject must be at least 40 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Subjects with a documented physician diagnosis of COPD.
  • Subjects who have been prescribed non-ELLIPTA MITT for daily use for at least 52 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • Male and/or female. Female subjects: A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and not a woman of childbearing potential.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Women who are: Pregnant or lactating or are planning on becoming pregnant during the study and of child bearing potential.
  • Subjects with an exacerbation with an onset within 4 weeks before Visit 1 must not be enrolled. Enrollment should be delayed until at least 4 weeks after the onset of an exacerbation or until the exacerbation has resolved, whichever is the longer.
  • Subjects with any life threatening condition (low probability in the opinion of the Investigator of 52 weeks survival due to severity of COPD or co-morbid condition at Visit 1.
  • Subjects with historical or current evidence of uncontrolled or clinically significant disease. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the effectiveness or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.
  • Subjects with severe milk-protein allergy or who have demonstrated hypersensitivity to FF/UMEC/VI or any of the excipients in TRELEGY ELLIPTA.
  • Subjects currently participating in any other study.
  • Subjects taking any investigational drug treatment within 30 days prior to Visit 1 or within five half-lives (t1/2) of completion of the prior investigational study (whichever is the longer of the two).
  • Subjects who are planning or may plan to change health plan or physician/investigator during the 52-week study.
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the treating physician, are considered to be a chronic user of oral corticosteroids (including oral and injectable) for respiratory or other indication in the past 52 weeks (if unsure discuss with the medical monitor prior to screening).
  • Subjects who have received a course of systemic corticosteroids for reasons other than COPD exacerbations within the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Subjects who inhaled non-ELLIPTA MITT
Subjects with moderate or severe exacerbation in the past year and history of use of inhaled non-ELLIPTA MITT of ICS/LABA/LAMA within a routine clinical practice setting in the 52-week retrospective pre-switch period.
Drug: Inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta2-adrenergic/long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists
A fixed dose of combination ICS/LABA plus LAMA once-daily was administered to COPD subjects using two separate non-ELLIPTA devices.
EXPERIMENTAL: Subjects receiving TRELEGY ELLIPTA SITT
Subjects will receive FF/UMEC/VI (100 microgram [mcg]/62.5 mcg/25 mcg), inhalation powder, once daily, in a single device (TRELEGY ELLIPTA) in the 52-week prospective post-switch period.
Drug: Fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol
The first strip will contain FF at a dose strength of 100 mcg will be blended with lactose. The second strip will be contain UMEC and VI at a dose strength of 25 mcg and 62.5 mcg blended with lactose and magnesium stearate with respectively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized rate of moderate, severe COPD exacerbations
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Moderate and severe COPD exacerbations will be defined using an algorithm agreed upon by GlaxoSmithKline and the health plans that identifies these events from health plan medical claims data. Moderate exacerbation is any physician office visit, urgent care visit or emergency room visit for COPD where any oral corticosteroids or antibiotics are prescribed during visit. Severe exacerbations are any COPD related inpatient visit. Exacerbations will be determined in the same fashion in the retrospective pre-switch period and the prospective post switch period.
104 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 27, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 206860

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings