Study of Platinum Plus Etoposide With or Without Tislelizumab in Participants With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

February 24, 2025 updated by: BeiGene

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Platinum Plus Etoposide With or Without Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) in Patients With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

This Phase 3 study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of tislelizumab in combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide (Arm A), compared to placebo combined with either cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide (Arm B), as a first-line treatment for participants with previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
457

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230601
        • The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100142
        • Beijing Cancer Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
        • Peking University Third Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Beijing Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100029
        • China Japan Friendship Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 102206
        • Peking University International Hospital
    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400042
        • Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
        • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350014
        • Fujian Cancer Hospital
      • Xiamen, Fujian, China, 361003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
    • Gansu
      • Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 730000
        • The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Guangdong Provincial Peoples Hospital
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510030
        • Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University
    • Guangxi
      • Guilin, Guangxi, China, 541001
        • Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University
      • Nanning, Guangxi, China, 530021
        • The Peoples Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
      • Nanning, Guangxi, China, 530021
        • The Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150000
        • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450052
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000
        • Henan Cancer Hospital
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430014
        • Wuhan Central Hospital
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
        • Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410013
        • Hunan Cancer Hospital
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410008
        • Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410004
        • Changsha Central Hospital
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210002
        • General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
        • Nanjing Chest Hospital
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215006
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, China, 130021
        • Jilin cancer hospital
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110001
        • The First Hospital of China Medical University
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110042
        • Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
    • Shaanxi
      • Xian, Shaanxi, China, 710061
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University
      • Xian, Shaanxi, China, 710061
        • Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250013
        • Jinan Central Hospital
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250117
        • Shandong Cancer Hospital
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266000
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Branch South
      • Yantai, Shandong, China, 264000
        • Yantai YuHuangDing Hospital
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute
    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300060
        • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300052
        • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
    • Xinjiang
      • Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, 830000
        • Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China, 650100
        • Yunnan Cancer Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310022
        • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age≥18 years old, male or female, signed Informed Consent Form (ICF).
  2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  3. Histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC
  4. No prior systemic treatment for ES-SCLC
  5. Adequate hematologic and end organ function

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active leptomeningeal disease or uncontrolled, untreated brain metastasis;
  2. Prior therapy with an antibody or drug against immune checkpoint pathways, including but not limited to, anti program death receptor-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-PD-L1, or anti cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (anti CTLA-4) antibody;
  3. Was administered a live vaccine ≤ 4 weeks before randomization;
  4. Active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse
  5. Any condition that required systemic treatment with either corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medication ≤ 14 days before randomization;
  6. With a history of interstitial lung disease, non-infectious pneumonitis, or uncontrolled systemic diseases;
  7. Severe chronic or active infections requiring systemic antibacterial, antifungal or antiviral therapy within 2 weeks prior to randomization, including but not limited to tuberculosis infection;
  8. Participant with untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV), or a known history of HIV infection;
  9. Participants with toxicities (as a result of prior anticancer therapy) which have not recovered to baseline or stabilized at the time of randomization;
  10. Clinically significant pericardial effusion, or Clinically uncontrolled pleural effusion

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm A: Tislelizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received tislelizumab in combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin (at the investigator's discretion) and etoposide during the induction phase, administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Upon completion of the induction phase, participants transitioned to maintenance therapy with tislelizumab only, administered once every 3 weeks.
Drug: Tislelizumab
200 mg administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
Drug: Cisplatin
75 mg/m² was administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, infused over a duration of two hours. Treatment with cisplatin was discontinued starting in Cycle 5 and beyond.
Drug: Carboplatin
An area under the curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL/min was administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, infused over a duration of 15 to 60 minutes. Treatment with carboplatin was discontinued starting in Cycle 5 and beyond.
Drug: Etoposide
100 mg/m² was administered intravenously from Day 1 to Day 3 of each 21-day cycle, infused over a duration of 60 minutes. Treatment with etoposide was discontinued starting in Cycle 5 and beyond.
Placebo Comparator: Arm B: Placebo + Chemotherapy
Participants received a placebo in combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin (at the investigator's discretion) and etoposide during the induction phase, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Upon completion of the induction phase, participants transitioned to maintenance therapy with placebo only, administered once every 3 weeks.
Drug: Cisplatin
75 mg/m² was administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, infused over a duration of two hours. Treatment with cisplatin was discontinued starting in Cycle 5 and beyond.
Drug: Carboplatin
An area under the curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL/min was administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, infused over a duration of 15 to 60 minutes. Treatment with carboplatin was discontinued starting in Cycle 5 and beyond.
Drug: Etoposide
100 mg/m² was administered intravenously from Day 1 to Day 3 of each 21-day cycle, infused over a duration of 60 minutes. Treatment with etoposide was discontinued starting in Cycle 5 and beyond.
Drug: Placebo
200 mg was administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle to match tislelizumab.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.

Defined as the time from randomization to the first objectively documented disease progression, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, as assessed by the investigator per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median PFS.

Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or any new lesions.
From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.

Orr is defined as the percentage of participants who had partial response or complete response as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 in all randomized patients with measurable disease at baseline.

Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits and no new lesions.
From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.

Defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is complete response, partial response, or stable disease per RECIST v1.1.

Stable Disease: Neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits, and no new lesions.
From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is complete response, partial response, or durable stable disease (stable disease for at least 24 weeks) per RECIST v1.1.
From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of relapse, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Median DOR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
From randomization to the primary completion cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From the first dose to 30 days after the last dose or final cutoff on December 29, 2023, maximum treatment exposure was 232 weeks for Arm A and 157 weeks for Arm B.
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0.
From the first dose to 30 days after the last dose or final cutoff on December 29, 2023, maximum treatment exposure was 232 weeks for Arm A and 157 weeks for Arm B.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status and Physical Function Score.
Time Frame: Baseline to Cycles 4 and 6 ( Each cycle was 21 days)
The EORTC QLQ-30 contains 30 questions that incorporate 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where 1 = Not at all (best) and 4 = Very Much (worst) and 2 global health quality of life (QOL) questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1 = Very poor and 7 = Excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. Higher scores in GHS and functional scales indicate better quality of life.
Baseline to Cycles 4 and 6 ( Each cycle was 21 days)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer (EORTC QLQ-LC13) Symptom Scores
Time Frame: Baseline to Cycles 4 and 6 ( Each cycle was 21 days)
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-CL13 scores for coughing, dysphagia, and chest pain. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a questionnaire that measures lung cancer-specific disease and treatment symptoms. It includes questions about specific symptoms in which participants respond based on a 4-point scale, where 1 is "not at all" and 4 is "very much". Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A lower score indicates an improvement in symptoms.
Baseline to Cycles 4 and 6 ( Each cycle was 21 days)
Time to Deterioration (TTD)
Time Frame: From randomization to the primary completion data cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.
Time to deterioration is defined as the time from randomization to the first confirmed worsening score or death. Clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as a ≥10-point decrease from baseline in QLQ-C30 physical functioning and a ≥10-point increase in QLQ-LC13 coughing and chest pain scores. If a participant did not have an event (death or deterioration), they were censored at their last clinic visit at which corresponding score was measured. Median TTD was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
From randomization to the primary completion data cut-off on April 19, 2023, the median follow-up was 15.44 months (range: 0.2-44.9) for Arm A and 13.22 months (range: 0.1-40.8) for Arm B.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
BeiGene

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Study Director, Study Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 19, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BGB-A317-312
  • CTR20190511 (Registry Identifier: ChinaDrugTrials)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings