Telephone Support for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients and Caregivers

November 25, 2022 updated by: Catherine Mosher, Indiana University

Telephone Support for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers

This trial tests telephone-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a type of psychotherapy, to reduce fatigue interference with activities, mood, and cognition in advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients and family caregiver burden. ACT includes mindfulness exercises (e.g., meditations, performing activities with greater awareness), identifying personal values (e.g., family, spirituality), and engaging in activities consistent with these values. A total of 40 patient-caregiver dyads were randomly assigned in equal numbers to either the ACT intervention or an education/support condition. Dyads in both conditions participated in six weekly 50-minute telephone sessions. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention. The investigators hypothesize that ACT will lead to improved primary and secondary outcomes as compared to education/support. Study findings will inform a large-scale trial of intervention efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This trial evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of telephone-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on fatigue interference in advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients and family caregiver burden as well as secondary outcomes. The study team recruited advanced GI cancer patients receiving care at the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center or Eskenazi Health hospital. Potentially eligible patients were mailed an introductory letter signed by their oncologist and the PI along with a consent form. The letter had a number to call if they did not wish to be contacted further. A research assistant (RA) called all prospective participants who did not opt out approximately 1 to 2 weeks after the letter was mailed. The RA described the study as outlined in the consent form and answered any questions. Then the RA administered an eligibility screening to those who consented to participate. Eligible and consenting patients identified a potentially eligible family caregiver. If the family caregiver was eligible and consented to participate, then the patient and caregiver each completed a baseline phone assessment. Following baseline assessments, patient-caregiver dyads (N = 40 dyads) were randomly assigned in equal numbers to ACT or education/support using a stratified block randomization scheme to balance the groups by patient performance status (patient-reported Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] scores 0 or 1 vs. 2). Dyads in both study conditions completed six weekly 50-minute telephone sessions with the first session occurring one week after baseline. For ACT participants, adherence to home practice during the past week was assessed and recorded during each session. Feasibility will be examined via accrual, attrition, and adherence rates, and acceptability will be evaluated using a mixed methods approach (qualitative and quantitative). Blind interviewers assessed outcomes during follow-up phone assessments at 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
84

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Eskenazi Health
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is at least 3 weeks post-diagnosis of unresectable stage III or stage IV gastrointestinal cancer (i.e., anal, colon, esophageal, gallbladder, liver, pancreatic, rectal, small intestine, or stomach cancer) and is receiving care at the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center or Eskenazi Health.
  • Patient is at least 21 years of age.
  • Patient can speak and read English.
  • Patient has an eligible, consenting family caregiver (see criteria below).
  • Patient has moderate to severe fatigue interference with functioning.

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient shows significant psychiatric or cognitive impairment that would preclude providing informed consent and study participation.
  • Patient reports being able to do little activity on a functional status measure.
  • Patient is receiving hospice care at screening.
  • Patient does not have working phone service.
  • Patient has hearing impairment that precludes participation.

Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:

  • Family caregiver identified by a stage IV gastrointestinal cancer patient who meets the eligibility criteria.
  • Caregiver has significant caregiving burden or distress
  • Caregiver lives with the patient or has visited the patient in-person at least twice a week for the past month.
  • Caregiver is at least 18 years of age.
  • Caregiver can speak and read English.

Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caregiver shows significant psychiatric or cognitive impairment that would preclude providing informed consent and study participation.
  • Caregiver does not have working phone service.
  • Caregiver has hearing impairment that precludes participation.
  • Patient declines study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Patients and caregivers in the ACT arm learn new and more adaptive ways to respond to difficult internal experiences (e.g., fatigue, thoughts, and feelings).
Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Across six weekly 50-minute sessions, advanced GI cancer patients and caregivers practice various mindfulness exercises, clarify their values, and set specific goals in alignment with their values. Through in-session and home practice of skills, participants learn new and more adaptive ways to respond to unwanted internal experiences (e.g., fatigue, distress). Participants receive handouts on session topics and a compact disc (CD) that we developed to guide mindfulness practices.
Active Comparator: Education/Support
Patients and caregivers in the education/support arm discuss their cancer-related concerns and receive education on services available in their medical center and community.
Behavioral: Education/Support
Across six weekly 50-minute sessions, advanced GI cancer patients and caregivers are directed to resources for practical and health information and contact information for psychosocial services. Sessions include an orientation to the patient's medical center and treatment team, education regarding common quality-of-life concerns experienced by cancer patients and caregivers, and an overview of medical center and community resources for addressing these concerns. The therapist also describes resources for addressing financial concerns and methods of evaluating health information available via the Internet and other modalities. Participants receive handouts summarizing session topics and are asked to review them as homework.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue Interference Subscale of Fatigue Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
Seven items are rated on 11-point scales (0=no interference to 10=extreme interference) that assess the extent to which fatigue in the past week interfered with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity (including housework), ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. The seven items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater fatigue interference. The total score range is 0 to 70. This is the primary outcome for patients.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
Short-form of Zarit Burden Interview
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
Twelve items are rated on 5-point scales (0=never to 4=nearly always) that assess personal strain and role strain due to caregiving. The 12 items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater caregiving burden. The total score range is 0 to 48. This is the primary outcome for caregivers.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep-Related Impairment
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
This 8-item measure assesses the perceived interference of sleep problems with activities, mood, and cognition (e.g., difficulty concentrating or completing tasks). Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Item #2 is reverse-scored and then the 8 items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater sleep-related impairment. The total scores are converted to T-scores with a range from 30.0 to 80.1. Higher T-scores indicate a worse outcome. The population mean for T-scores is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. This is a secondary outcome for patients.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
This 6-item measure assesses participants' ability to participate in social roles and activities. The items measure difficulty engaging in social and recreational activities as well as usual work (including housework). Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) and is reverse coded. Then the six items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater ability to participate in social roles and activities. The total scores are converted to T-scores with a range from 26.7 to 65.0 with higher scores indicating a better outcome. The population mean for T-scores is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. This is a secondary outcome for both patients and caregivers.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
This 7-item measure assesses psychological flexibility, or the ability to fully experience the present moment while persisting in actions aligned with personal values. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). The seven items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater levels of psychological inflexibility. The total score range is 7 to 49. This is a secondary outcome for both patients and caregivers.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
This 15-item measure evaluates physical, psychological, existential, and social quality of life in patients with serious illnesses. Each of the 4 subscale scores (i.e., physical, psychological, existential, and social quality of life) is the sum of the items with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Items are rated on 0 to 10 scales. The physical quality of life subscale is the sum of 3 items (2 items reverse-coded) with a range of 0 to 30. The psychological quality of life subscale is the sum of 4 items (all items reverse-coded) with a range of 0 to 40. The existential quality of life subscale is the sum of 4 items (1 item reverse-coded) with a range of 0 to 40. The social quality of life subscale is the sum of 3 items (none reverse-coded) with a range of 0 to 30. This is a secondary outcome measure for patients.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
PROMIS Global Health
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
This 10-item measure assesses global health, including physical, mental, and social well-being. With the exception of pain, which is rated on a 0 to 10 scale, all items are rated on 5-point scales from 1 to 5. The item on pain is recoded from a 0-10 to a 1-5 scale and reverse-scored. Two additional items are reverse-scored. Then four of the items are summed, with higher physical quality of life subscale scores indicating better physical quality of life. Four other items are also summed with higher psychological quality of life subscale scores indicating better psychological quality of life. The subscale scores are converted to T-scores with a range from 16.2 to 67.7 for physical quality of life and a range from 21.2 to 67.6 for psychological quality of life. Higher T-scores for the physical and psychological quality of life subscales indicate a better outcome. The population mean for T-scores is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. This is a secondary outcome measure for caregivers.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
Value Progress Subscale of the Valuing Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention
This 5-item subscale assesses progress in living according to one's personal values, a construct related to activity engagement. Items are rated on 0 to 6 scales. The 5 items are summed with higher total subscale scores indicating greater progress in living according to one's personal values. The total subscale score range is 0 to 30. This is a secondary outcome measure for patients and caregivers.
2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Indiana University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Catherine E Mosher, Ph.D., Indiana University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1904388865
  • R21CA235788 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Results of this trial will be presented at professional meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. The data set will be made available to qualified investigators within 6 months of the publication of the primary outcome paper. The data set will contain necessary identifiers, excluding those prohibited by HIPAA. The investigators will be required to sign a data use agreement and obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval before receiving the data set.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data set will be made available to qualified investigators within 6 months of the publication of the primary outcome paper. Data will be available for at least 6 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data set and supporting information will be made available to qualified investigators to allow replication of analyses or secondary data analyses. The PI will review requests for data access. The investigators will be required to sign a data use agreement and obtain IRB approval before receiving the data set. The mechanism for data sharing will be reviewed by the IRB.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings