PES to Avoid Extubation Failure in Intubated Stroke Patients at High Risk of Severe Dysphagia

July 4, 2019 updated by: University Hospital Muenster

Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES) to Avoid Extubation Failure in Intubated Stroke at High Risk of Severe Dysphagia

Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) recently became a growing concern as a major risk factor for extubation failure and significant contributor to poor patient outcomes with prevalence rates ranging from 12% to 69%, being highest in neurological patients (93%).

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) has been shown to improve airway safety and swallowing function tracheostomized stroke patients, thereby enhancing decannulation in this patient cohort.

In the present study the investigators evaluate whether PES is safe, feasible and effective in orotracheal intubated stroke patients at high risk of extubation failure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are common procedures for critically ill stroke patients. Although necessary and life-saving, timely extubation after ventilator weaning is desirable, because patients with delayed extubation experience higher pneumonia rate, increased need for tracheostomy, longer length of stay on the intensive care unit and higher mortality. On the other hand, extubation failure (EF) and subsequent need for emergent re-intubation is associated with similar sequelae.

Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) became a growing concern as a major risk factor for EF and significant contributor to poor patient outcomes with prevalence rates ranging from 12% to 69%, being highest in neurological patients (93%). Damage to the central swallowing network itself is the primary cause of PED in cerebrovascular disease, which constitutes the leading diagnosis on neuro-ICUs. Further mechanisms include pharyngolaryngeal lesions caused by the tube, critical illness neuropathy and myopathy leading to muscle weakness and dyscoordination of breathing and swallowing, and an impaired sensation due to sedation, mucosal damage, or the underlying critical illness itself. As a consequence reintubation rates in neurological collectives are as high as 20 to 40%.

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) has been shown to improve airway safety and swallowing function tracheostomized stroke patients, thereby enhancing decannulation in this patient cohort.

In the present study the investigators evaluate whether PES is safe, feasible and effective in orotracheal intubated stroke patients at high risk of extubation failure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Acute stroke orotracheal intubation high-risk of extubation failure (DEFISS-score ≥4) successful respiratory weaning according to the treating intensivist within 24 to 72 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients are excluded from study participation if any of the following apply:

  • Suffer from pre-existing neurogenic dysphagia or a condition that can cause dysphagia (for example Parkinson's Disease);
  • Suffer from non-neurogenic dysphagia (e.g. cancer);
  • Suffer from neuromuscular disorders (e.g. myasthenia gravis, motor neuron disease);
  • Participate in any other study potentially influencing the outcome of PES, both medicinal or medical device product related and for which the patient signed a consent form for his/her study participation;
  • Receive or have received within one month prior to the intended PES treatment any other type of standard cranial or percutaneous electrical stimulation therapy to treat dysphagia;
  • Have a pacemaker or an implantable defibrillator;
  • Have a nasal anatomical deformity, nasal airway obstruction, have had oesophageal surgery or any other circumstance where placement of a standard NG feeding tube would be deemed unsafe;
  • Have a cardiac or respiratory condition that might render the insertion of the catheter into the throat unsafe;
  • Are pregnant or nursing women;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation
Orotracheal intubated patients at high risk of extubation failure will receive open-label PES
Device: Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES)
PES will be delivered by a commercial device (Phagenyx, Phagenesis Ltd, Manchester, UK), which comprises a nasogastric feeding catheter that houses stimulation ring-electrodes and a computerised base station that delivers stimulation in the range 1-50 mA at 5 Hz.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful extubation
Time Frame: 72 hours after extubation
No re-intubation within 72 hours after extubation
72 hours after extubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pneumonia
Time Frame: up to 14 days
Pneumonia post extubation until hospital discharge
up to 14 days
Feeding status
Time Frame: up to 14 days
Functional Oral Intake Scale
up to 14 days
Swallowing function
Time Frame: 0-24 hours after extubation
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale
0-24 hours after extubation
Swallowing function
Time Frame: 72-120 hours after extubation
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale
72-120 hours after extubation
Swallowing function
Time Frame: up to 14 days
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale
up to 14 days
Length of stay of the ICU/intermediate care
Time Frame: up to 60 days
Length of stay in days
up to 60 days
Length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: up to 120 days
Length of stay in hospital in days
up to 120 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Muenster

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rainer Dziewas, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 4, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 01072018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

a subset of fully anonymised patient data may be available upon request from the authors

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings