PES to Avoid Extubation Failure in Intubated Stroke Patients at High Risk of Severe Dysphagia

July 4, 2019 updated by: University Hospital Muenster

Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES) to Avoid Extubation Failure in Intubated Stroke at High Risk of Severe Dysphagia

Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) recently became a growing concern as a major risk factor for extubation failure and significant contributor to poor patient outcomes with prevalence rates ranging from 12% to 69%, being highest in neurological patients (93%).

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) has been shown to improve airway safety and swallowing function tracheostomized stroke patients, thereby enhancing decannulation in this patient cohort.

In the present study the investigators evaluate whether PES is safe, feasible and effective in orotracheal intubated stroke patients at high risk of extubation failure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are common procedures for critically ill stroke patients. Although necessary and life-saving, timely extubation after ventilator weaning is desirable, because patients with delayed extubation experience higher pneumonia rate, increased need for tracheostomy, longer length of stay on the intensive care unit and higher mortality. On the other hand, extubation failure (EF) and subsequent need for emergent re-intubation is associated with similar sequelae.

Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) became a growing concern as a major risk factor for EF and significant contributor to poor patient outcomes with prevalence rates ranging from 12% to 69%, being highest in neurological patients (93%). Damage to the central swallowing network itself is the primary cause of PED in cerebrovascular disease, which constitutes the leading diagnosis on neuro-ICUs. Further mechanisms include pharyngolaryngeal lesions caused by the tube, critical illness neuropathy and myopathy leading to muscle weakness and dyscoordination of breathing and swallowing, and an impaired sensation due to sedation, mucosal damage, or the underlying critical illness itself. As a consequence reintubation rates in neurological collectives are as high as 20 to 40%.

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) has been shown to improve airway safety and swallowing function tracheostomized stroke patients, thereby enhancing decannulation in this patient cohort.

In the present study the investigators evaluate whether PES is safe, feasible and effective in orotracheal intubated stroke patients at high risk of extubation failure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Acute stroke orotracheal intubation high-risk of extubation failure (DEFISS-score ≥4) successful respiratory weaning according to the treating intensivist within 24 to 72 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients are excluded from study participation if any of the following apply:

  • Suffer from pre-existing neurogenic dysphagia or a condition that can cause dysphagia (for example Parkinson's Disease);
  • Suffer from non-neurogenic dysphagia (e.g. cancer);
  • Suffer from neuromuscular disorders (e.g. myasthenia gravis, motor neuron disease);
  • Participate in any other study potentially influencing the outcome of PES, both medicinal or medical device product related and for which the patient signed a consent form for his/her study participation;
  • Receive or have received within one month prior to the intended PES treatment any other type of standard cranial or percutaneous electrical stimulation therapy to treat dysphagia;
  • Have a pacemaker or an implantable defibrillator;
  • Have a nasal anatomical deformity, nasal airway obstruction, have had oesophageal surgery or any other circumstance where placement of a standard NG feeding tube would be deemed unsafe;
  • Have a cardiac or respiratory condition that might render the insertion of the catheter into the throat unsafe;
  • Are pregnant or nursing women;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation
Orotracheal intubated patients at high risk of extubation failure will receive open-label PES
PES will be delivered by a commercial device (Phagenyx, Phagenesis Ltd, Manchester, UK), which comprises a nasogastric feeding catheter that houses stimulation ring-electrodes and a computerised base station that delivers stimulation in the range 1-50 mA at 5 Hz.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful extubation
Time Frame: 72 hours after extubation
No re-intubation within 72 hours after extubation
72 hours after extubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pneumonia
Time Frame: up to 14 days
Pneumonia post extubation until hospital discharge
up to 14 days
Feeding status
Time Frame: up to 14 days
Functional Oral Intake Scale
up to 14 days
Swallowing function
Time Frame: 0-24 hours after extubation
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale
0-24 hours after extubation
Swallowing function
Time Frame: 72-120 hours after extubation
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale
72-120 hours after extubation
Swallowing function
Time Frame: up to 14 days
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale
up to 14 days
Length of stay of the ICU/intermediate care
Time Frame: up to 60 days
Length of stay in days
up to 60 days
Length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: up to 120 days
Length of stay in hospital in days
up to 120 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rainer Dziewas, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

a subset of fully anonymised patient data may be available upon request from the authors

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES)

Subscribe