Project My Heart Your Heart: Pacemaker Reuse (MHYH)
Project My Heart Your Heart: Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Pacemaker Reuse in Low to Middle Income Countries
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Eldoret, Kenya
- The Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Monterrey, Mexico
- Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
-
-
-
-
-
Maputo, Mozambique
- Hospital Central De Maputo
-
-
-
-
Lagos
-
Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria, 101233
- LASUTH
-
-
Rivers
-
Port Harcourt, Rivers, Nigeria
- Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Asunción, Paraguay
- FUNDACOR
-
-
-
-
-
Freetown, Sierra Leone
- Choithram Memorial Hospital
-
-
-
-
Lara
-
Barquisimeto, Lara, Venezuela, 3001
- ASCARDIO
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy ≥ 2 years.
- Indications for device implantation must be fulfilled per standard of care. Consistent with 2008 American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association guidelines for device therapy, one of the following class I indications must be met.
- Sinus Node Dysfunction
- Acquired Atrioventricular (AV) Block
- Chronic Bifascicular Block
- Hypersensitive Carotid Syndrome
- Lack of financial ability to pay for a new device must be assessed and documented.
- All other methods of new device acquisition must be exhausted.
- Patient must be agreeable and able to follow-up with the implanting center within 2 weeks for wound check, at 2 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter for routine pacemaker checks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe valvular disease
- Severe pulmonary disease
- End-stage renal disease (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) whether or not on dialysis
- Evidence of ongoing systemic infection
- Prior pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation
- Significant contraindication to pacemaker implantation per evaluation of the implanting physician (very high risk of complications).
- Presence of any other condition that the local investigator feels would be problematic or would restrict or limit the participation of the patient for the entire study period
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: New Device
New pacemakers will be sourced from pacemaker manufacturers.
|
Devices from the four manufacturers below will be used.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Reconditioned Device
Donated devices are inspected according to specific protocols that evaluate physical and electrical (battery longevity) suitability for future use.
Devices deemed to be acceptable are shipped to a third-party vendor (NEScientific) for disassembly, cleaning and re-sterilization.
|
Devices from the three manufacturers below will be used.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Freedom from Procedure-Related Infection at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months post device implantation
|
Clinical evidence of pacemaker infection includes local signs of inflammation at the generator site such as erythema, warmth, fluctuance, tenderness, purulent drainage, wound dehiscence, or erosion.
Device related endocarditis will be reported if the Duke criteria for infective endocarditis are met.
Procedure-related infections will be classified as follows: pocket infection, endocarditis, recurrent bacteremia, extrusion of wires or generator
|
12 months post device implantation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Freedom from Pacemaker Software or Hardware Malfunction at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months post device implantation
|
Pacemaker software or hardware malfunction include unexpected premature battery depletion, device or electrode malfunction, or unexplained patient death.
|
12 months post device implantation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Crawford, MD, University of Michigan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00050238
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.