Comparison of Tear Evaporation Rate With DAILIES TOTAL1 and Biotrue ONEday (MALTESE)

March 25, 2021 updated by: University of Waterloo
The purpose of this pilot study is to compare the effect of DAILIES TOTAL1, a low water content silicone hydrogel lens, and Biotrue ONEday, a high water content hydrogel lens, on the rate of tear evaporation. The study will also serve to validate the novel, in-house developed evaporimeter.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
        • Centre for Ocular Research & Education

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
  2. Has read and signed an information consent letter;
  3. Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
  4. Has worn soft contact lenses for a minimum of 6 months;
  5. Currently wears soft contact lenses for at least 4 days per week and 8 hours per day;
  6. Has an acceptable fit and comfort with both study contact lenses in the powers available;
  7. Has less than or equal to 1.00DS difference between eyes in their habitual contact lenses;
  8. Is willing to be awake for at least 2 hours before visit 2;
  9. Is willing to not wear eye makeup on the day of visit 2 and 3;
  10. Is willing to not use eye drops or artificial tears on the day of visits 1, 2, and 3;
  11. Has a wearable pair of spectacles.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
  2. Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection;
  3. Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  4. Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  5. Has known sensitivity to sodium fluorescein dye;
  6. Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit);
  7. Is aphakic;
  8. Has undergone refractive error surgery;
  9. Has a known sensitivity to petroleum jelly (Vaseline);
  10. Has epilepsy and/or a sensitivity to flashing lights;
  11. Wears toric contact lenses;
  12. Has any physical impairment that would interfere with holding the evaporimeter;
  13. Has taken part in another research study within the last 14 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Nesofilcon A/Delefilcon A
Nesofilcon A was worn in right eye and delefilcon A worn in the left eye.
Device: Nesofilcon A
Hydrogel contact lens for daily wear
Device: Delefilcon A
Silicone hydrogel contact lens for daily wear
Experimental: Delefilcon A/Nesofilcon A
Delefilcon A was worn in right eye and Nesofilcon A worn in the left eye.
Device: Nesofilcon A
Hydrogel contact lens for daily wear
Device: Delefilcon A
Silicone hydrogel contact lens for daily wear

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tear Evaporation Rate With Nesofilcon A
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 minutes post-contact lens, 6 hours post-contact lens
Tear film evaporation rate (% relative humidity per second) was performed using a novel evaporimeter as a non-invasive measurement of tear film evaporation. The slope was calculated from the change in humidity between 7 to 17.5 seconds while the eye was open and between 10 to 17.5 seconds when the eye was closed. Data from the both eyes were analyzed.
Baseline, 15 minutes post-contact lens, 6 hours post-contact lens
Tear Evaporation Rate With Delefilcon A
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 minutes post-contact lens, 6 hours post-contact lens
Tear film evaporation rate (% relative humidity per second) was performed using a novel evaporimeter as a non-invasive measurement of tear film evaporation. The slope was calculated from the change in humidity between 7 to 17.5 seconds while the eye was open and between 10 to 17.5 seconds when the eye was closed. Data from the both eyes were analyzed.
Baseline, 15 minutes post-contact lens, 6 hours post-contact lens

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Waterloo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 41195

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Evaporative Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Nesofilcon A

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings