Comparative Efficacy of Lipid Based Artificial Tears vs Aqueous Based Artificial Tears in Managing EDE

July 12, 2025 updated by: Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University

Comparative Efficacy of Lipid Based Artificial Tears vs Aqueous Based Artificial Tears in Managing EDE: A 6 Week RCT

This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of a lipid-based artificial tear (Recuro) against an aqueous-based artificial tear (Softeal) in managing EDE symptoms and signs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Mughal Eye Hospital, Lahore. A sample size of 60 participants (30 per group) was determined using G*Power. Participants (18-55 years, both genders) were assigned 1:1 to Recuro or Softeal for 6 weeks using block randomization (block size 4) generated by Research Randomizer. Primary outcomes included OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) and SANDE (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye) scores; secondary outcomes were Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, and Meibomian gland expression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Mughal eye Hospital Johar town

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (both genders) aged 18-55 years diagnosed with evaporative dry eye (EDE).
  • Willingness to adhere to the prescribed treatment regimen (lipid-based or aqueous-based artificial tears).
  • Include patients with a history of dry eye symptoms for at least 1-3 months.
  • Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥13, indicating the presence of mild to severe dry eye symptoms.
  • Patients with tear break-up time (TBUT) <10 seconds, indicating tear film instability.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of any topical ophthalmic medications (e.g., lubricants, anti-inflammatory drugs, or cyclosporine) for dry eye within the last 1 month.
  • Active ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., conjunctivitis, uveitis).
  • History of ocular surgery or trauma within the past 6 months.
  • Participants currently wearing contact lenses or those who have worn contact lenses in the past three months.
  • Systemic conditions known to impact ocular surface health, such as uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune disorders, or Sjögren's syndrome.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lipid Based Artificial Tears
30 participants received lipid-based artificial tears (Recuro) in this study arm. The intervention involved the administration of RECURO EYE DROPS, which contain Sodium carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%. Participants were instructed to instill 1-2 drops in each eye, three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening) throughout the 6-week trial period.
Experimental: Aqueous Based Artificial Tears
30 participants received aqueous-based artificial tears (Softeal) in this study arm. The intervention involved the administration of SOFTEAL EYE DROPS, which contain Hydroxypropylmethyl Cellulose 0.3%. Participants were instructed to instill 1-2 drops in each eye, three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening) throughout the 6-week trial period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: 12 Months

Assesses dry eye symptom frequency and impact on vision-related activities. Score ranges from 0-100.

Scoring: 0-12 (Normal), 13-22 (Mild dry eye), 23-32 (Moderate dry eye), ≥ 33 (Severe dry eye).

12 Months
SANDE Questionnaire (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye)
Time Frame: 12 Months

Measures the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms. Score ranges from 0-100.

Scoring: Higher scores indicate more severe and frequent symptoms

12 Months
Meibum Test Score
Time Frame: 12 Months

This score quantifies meibomian gland health and lipid secretion based on meibum quality and expressibility. It is derived from the assessment of 5 central glands in the lower eyelid.

Scoring: Each assessed gland is scored from 0-3, resulting in a total Meibum Test Score for each eye ranging from 0-15.

  • Meibum Test Score Key (Per Gland):
  • 0: Clear meibum, no blockage (Healthy function)
  • 1: Cloudy meibum, mild dysfunction
  • 2: Thickened meibum, partial blockage
  • 3: No meibum expressed, severe obstruction
  • Interpretation: Lower total scores indicate healthier meibomian gland function and better meibum quality/expressibility.
12 Months
Tear Break-up Time (TBUT): ( without anesthesia)
Time Frame: 12 months

Measures tear film stability by observing the time (in seconds) until the first dry spot appears on the cornea after blinking.

Scoring: TBUT <10 seconds is indicative of tear film instability and often associated with dry eye.

12 months
Schirmer Test I
Time Frame: 12 Months

Measures tear volume by assessing the length of wetting on a filter paper strip (in millimeters) after 5 minutes, without anesthesia.

Scoring: ≥10 mm (Normal Tear Production),

  • 5-9 mm: Mild to Moderate Tear Deficiency (or decreased production), often associated with mild to moderate dry eye
  • <5 mm: Severe Tear Deficiency (or significantly decreased production), indicative of severe dry eye
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MSRSW/Batch-Fall23/792

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Evaporative Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Lipid Based Artificial Tears

Subscribe