Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Cannabis For the Uncontrolled Pain Relief in Patients With Advanced Cancer (PLENITUDE)

September 13, 2021 updated by: Tetra Bio-Pharma

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PPP001-kit FOR THE UNCONTROLLED PAIN RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY

This phase 2 multicenter clinical trial assess the safety and efficacy of inhaled PPP001 to relieve the pain in 78 advanced cancer patients with uncontrolled symptoms. This is a 4-week treatment period study followed by an open label period of 1 year.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a 4-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled PPP001 on uncontrolled cancer pain in patients with symptoms related to advanced incurable cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
78

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Tetra Bio Pharma
  • Phone Number: +1(438)8997575

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Cave Creek, Arizona, United States, 85331
        • Recruiting
        • Scottsdale Research Institute
        • Contact:
          • Suzanne Sisley, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent,
  2. Adult male and female patients at least 18 years of age,
  3. Subject agreed to follow the protocol,
  4. Advanced cancer for which there is no known curative therapy as per investigator's judgement,
  5. Patients experiencing at least 2 symptoms related to cancer > 4 on ESAS-r-CS NRS including pain symptom,
  6. Life expectancy six weeks or longer with PPS > 50% and PaP Score Group A (30-day survival probability >70%),
  7. No cognitive impairment according to Mini-Cog©,
  8. The patient is able to perform deep inhalations with FEV1 more than 60%,
  9. Ability to read and respond to questions in English,

  10. A female volunteer must meet one of the following criteria:

    If of childbearing potential - agrees to use one of the accepted contraceptive regimens from at least 28 days prior to the first drug administration, during the study and for at least 60 days after the last dose, If of non-childbearing potential - should be surgically sterile or in a menopausal state,

  11. A male volunteer with sexual partners who are pregnant, possibly pregnant, or who could become pregnant must be surgically sterile or agrees to use one of the accepted contraceptive regimens from first drug administration until 3 months after the last drug administration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: inhaled THC/CBD (PPP001)
PPP001 (cannabis dosing capsule with THC/CBD) inhalation with a device
Drug: PPP001
1 cannabis dosing capsule inhaled 3 times a day with a vaporizer device
Other Names:
  • QIXLEEF
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo inhalation with a device
Drug: Placebo
1 placebo dosing capsule inhaled 3 times a day with a vaporizer device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uncontrolled cancer pain will be measured using a patient self-administered questionnaire.
Time Frame: change from baseline in the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL pain multi-item scale score at Week 4.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 15 Palliative (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL). items are rated on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). high scores on a symptom scale correlate to increased symptom burden
change from baseline in the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL pain multi-item scale score at Week 4.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The overall HRQoL (Health related Quality of Life) of patients with uncontrolled symptoms related to advanced cancer will be measured using a patient self rating questionnaire.
Time Frame: change from baseline in the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL overall QoL single-item scale score at Week 4
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 15 Palliative (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL). single-item scale is rated from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). High scores on a functional scale correspond to better functioning
change from baseline in the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL overall QoL single-item scale score at Week 4
The physical, emotional, and total symptom distress will be measured using a patient self administered questionnaire.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in ESAS-r-CS at Weeks 1 and 4
Revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r-CS). 11 core symptoms: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxious, drowsiness, appetite, feeling of well-being, shortness of breath, constipation and trouble sleeping. 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible).
Change from Baseline in ESAS-r-CS at Weeks 1 and 4
The palliative performance scale will be scored by a healthcare profesional.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in PPS at Weeks 1 and 4
palliative performance scale version 2 (PPSv2) for measuring functional status in end-of-life patients. A healthcare professional scores each dimension by assigning a value from 100% to 0% (death), with 10% denoting the lowest level of functioning
Change from Baseline in PPS at Weeks 1 and 4
The satisfaction of family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer will be measured using a caregiver self administered questionnaire.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in treatment-satisfaction questionnaire at Weeks 1 and 4
The treatment satisfaction questionnaire (change version) will be used. Scale range is a left to right 7-item scale for caregiver. each item is scored from 5 (Much more satisfied now) to 1 (Much Less satisfied now).
Change from Baseline in treatment-satisfaction questionnaire at Weeks 1 and 4
The distress of patients with advanced cancer will be measured using a patient self-administered questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in distress thermometer at Week 4
distress thermometer adopted as a screening measure to identify and address psychological distress in individuals with cancer. Results support a cut-off score of 3 on the DT to indicate patients with clinically elevated levels of distress .
Change from Baseline in distress thermometer at Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tetra Bio-Pharma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PPP001-Ph2-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings