Mobile Technologies and Post-stroke Depression (MOTIV-POSDEP)

May 29, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

MObile Technologies In the preVention of POSt-stroke DEPression

The recent development of acute phase treatments has dramatically improved stroke functional outcome but post-stroke neuropsychiatric disorders, notably post-stroke depression, continue to contribute to the heavy burden of stroke. While these conditions affect about 25% of stroke patients at 3 months, they are under-reported spontaneously by patients and are under-evaluated and treated by clinicians. Other than stroke severity and psychiatric history, risk factors for post-stroke depression remain a matter of debate, thus preventing identification of high-risk patients. Moreover, to date, neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological treatments have demonstrated a significant benefit in the prevention of this disorder, thereby also impeding the development of early treatment strategies. Yet,the early management of post-stroke depression is critical given its negative influence on long-term functional outcomes, medication adherence, efficient use of rehabilitation services and the risk of stroke recurrence or vascular events. There is a pressing need to develop new tools allowing for the early detection of post-stroke neuropsychiatric complications for each individual patient. The rapid expansion of ambulatory monitoring techniques, such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), allows daily evaluations of mood symptoms in real time and in the natural contexts of daily life. The investigators have previously validated the feasibility and validity of EMA to assess daily life emotional symptoms after stroke, demonstrating its utility to investigate their evolution during the 3 months following stroke and to identify early predictors of post-stroke depression such as stress reactivity and social support, suggesting that EMA could be used in the early personalized care management of these neuropsychiatric complications. Recently, preliminary data have also emphasized the potential of EMA interventions to improve the outcome of psychiatric disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
401

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bordeaux, France, 33 076
        • CHU de Bordeaux
      • Brest, France, 29 609
        • CHRU de Brest
      • Dijon, France, 21 079
        • CHU Dijon Bourgogne
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • CHU de Montpellier
      • Paris, France, 75 014
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris - Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Male or Female.
  • Recent (≤ 15 days) clinically-symptomatic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke documented through brain imaging (CT or MRI) or a Transient Ischemic Attack with an ABCD2 score ≥ 4.
  • Patient discharged to home after hospitalization in the stroke unit.
  • No severe neurological handicap: modified Rankin scale ≤ 3 at inclusion.
  • No severe cognitive impairment or dementia: MoCA ≥ 16 at inclusion.
  • Written informed consent by the patient.
  • Covered by French Social Insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transient Non Cerebrovascular Event.
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  • Dementia syndrome or other neurologic disorder and/or severe aphasia (NIHSS item 9 ≥ 2) interfering with the completion of evaluations and the utilization of EMA.
  • Severe visual impairment interfering with the utilization of EMA.
  • Severely impaired physical and/or mental health that, according to the investigator, may affect the participant's compliance with the study
  • Patients with a severe substance use disorder (DSM-5 criteria)
  • Patients under antidepressant and/or anxiolytic and/or neuroleptic and/or mood stabilizer treatment during the month preceding inclusion
  • Participation in another protocol modifying the patient's follow-up status.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inability to read French or to use a smartphone
  • Individuals under legal protection or unable to express personnally their consent
  • Individuals living in an area without 3G/4G internet coverage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Treatment As Usual (TAU)
Evaluation of depression and anxiety disorders at 3 and 6 months post-stroke using psychological and functional examination
Other: Psychological evaluation
Psychological evaluation including: MINI (current diagnosis) ; HDRS ; MDQ ; GAD-7 ; PC-PTSD-5 ; Quality of Sleep (item 6 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) ; CES-D ; BAI ; RRS-short form ; IES-R ; mYFAS2.0;
Other: Functional evaluation
Functional evaluation including : EQ5-D ; MFI ; LUNS ; SSQ ; Physical activity (IPAQ)
Biological: Biological assessment
Biological assessment : White and red blood cells count ; platelets count ; Haemoglobin ; CRPus ; Glycaemia ; Plasmatic HbA1c ; Plasmatic LDLc ; HDLc and triglyceride ; Creatinin clearance, Transaminases.
Experimental: EMA intervention assocuated to Treatment As Usual (EMA-TAU)
Evaluation of depression and anxiety disorders at 3 and 6 months post-stroke using psychological and functional examination in addition with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) evaluation.
Other: Psychological evaluation
Psychological evaluation including: MINI (current diagnosis) ; HDRS ; MDQ ; GAD-7 ; PC-PTSD-5 ; Quality of Sleep (item 6 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) ; CES-D ; BAI ; RRS-short form ; IES-R ; mYFAS2.0;
Other: Functional evaluation
Functional evaluation including : EQ5-D ; MFI ; LUNS ; SSQ ; Physical activity (IPAQ)
Biological: Biological assessment
Biological assessment : White and red blood cells count ; platelets count ; Haemoglobin ; CRPus ; Glycaemia ; Plasmatic HbA1c ; Plasmatic LDLc ; HDLc and triglyceride ; Creatinin clearance, Transaminases.
Other: Ecological Momentary Assessment
During 3 months after inclusion, a 3 to 5 minutes daily interview will administer questions concerning mood symptoms, activities, stress experience, substance use, social relationships and medication intake, activities, social interaction, environmental conditions, experience of depressed mood, anhedonia, changes in weight, appetite, sleep, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness or inappropriate guilt, concentration or decision-making difficulty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HDRS)
Time Frame: Day 0
Semi-structured interview questionnaire designed to be used by a health care professional to investigate depressive symptomatology. 17 items are used to provide a score.
Day 0
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HDRS)
Time Frame: 3 months
Semi-structured interview questionnaire designed to be used by a health care professional to investigate depressive symptomatology. 17 items are used to provide a score.
3 months
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HDRS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Semi-structured interview questionnaire designed to be used by a health care professional to investigate depressive symptomatology. 17 items are used to provide a score.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
13 questions on mood symptoms and 2 additional questions on the co-occurrence and psychosocial impact of these symptoms. This questionnaire assesses the probability of an existing bipolar disorder. A positive screen include : a) answering 'Yes' to at least 7 of 13 questions, and b) reporting that several of these symptoms have been experienced during the same period of time, and c) reporting that psychosocial impairment has been caused by these symptoms.
3 months
Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
13 questions on mood symptoms and 2 additional questions on the co-occurrence and psychosocial impact of these symptoms. This questionnaire assesses the probability of an existing bipolar disorder. A positive screen include : a) answering 'Yes' to at least 7 of 13 questions, and b) reporting that several of these symptoms have been experienced during the same period of time, and c) reporting that psychosocial impairment has been caused by these symptoms.
6 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 3 months
7 items that assess GAD symptoms experienced over the past two weeks. Patients are asked the frequency of these symptoms using a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). A cutoff score of greater than 10 is commonly used to identify cases of GAD.
3 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 6 months
7 items that assess GAD symptoms experienced over the past two weeks. Patients are asked the frequency of these symptoms using a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). A cutoff score of greater than 10 is commonly used to identify cases of GAD.
6 months
Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5)
Time Frame: 3 months
5-item screen designed to identify individuals with probable PTSD. It begins with an item designed to assess whether the respondent has had any exposure to traumatic events. If a respondent denies exposure, the scale is completed with a score of 0. If the respondent indicates a trauma history, he/she has additional Yes/No questions about how the traumatic event has affected him/her over the past month. If the total score is 3 or more, the screen indicates probable PTSD.
3 months
Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5)
Time Frame: 6 months
5-item screen designed to identify individuals with probable PTSD. It begins with an item designed to assess whether the respondent has had any exposure to traumatic events. If a respondent denies exposure, the scale is completed with a score of 0. If the respondent indicates a trauma history, he/she has additional Yes/No questions about how the traumatic event has affected him/her over the past month. If the total score is 3 or more, the screen indicates probable PTSD.
6 months
Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 3 months
20-item. It measures symptoms of depression in nine different groups as defined by the DSM-5: Sadness (Dysphoria, 3 items), Loss of Interest (Anhedonia, 2 items), Appetite (2 items), Sleep (3 items), Thinking (Concentration, 2 items), Guilt or Worthlessness (2 items), Fatigue (2 items), Agitation (2 items), Suicidal ideation (2 items).
3 months
Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 6 months
20-item. It measures symptoms of depression in nine different groups as defined by the DSM-5: Sadness (Dysphoria, 3 items), Loss of Interest (Anhedonia, 2 items), Appetite (2 items), Sleep (3 items), Thinking (Concentration, 2 items), Guilt or Worthlessness (2 items), Fatigue (2 items), Agitation (2 items), Suicidal ideation (2 items).
6 months
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: 3 months
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) assesses the severity of patient anxiety during the past week. Though anxiety can be thought of as having several components, including cognitive, somatic, affective, and behavioral components included only two components in the BAI's original version: cognitive and somatic symptoms, with the cognitive subscale providing a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. Care was taken during scale construction to eliminate items that would be confounded with depression items. Patients respond to the frequence of 21 symptoms using a scale from 0 (Never) to 3 (Frequently, Almost every day).
3 months
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) assesses the severity of patient anxiety during the past week. Though anxiety can be thought of as having several components, including cognitive, somatic, affective, and behavioral components included only two components in the BAI's original version: cognitive and somatic symptoms, with the cognitive subscale providing a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. Care was taken during scale construction to eliminate items that would be confounded with depression items. Patients respond to the frequence of 21 symptoms using a scale from 0 (Never) to 3 (Frequently, Almost every day).
6 months
Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form)
Time Frame: 3 months
Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form) is one of the most widely used self-reported measures of rumination, comprising 9 items and describing the factors of brooding (5 items) and reflection (5 items). For each item, patients indicate the frequency of each event on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("almost always").
3 months
Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form)
Time Frame: 6 months
Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form) is one of the most widely used self-reported measures of rumination, comprising 9 items and describing the factors of brooding (5 items) and reflection (5 items). For each item, patients indicate the frequency of each event on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("almost always").
6 months
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: 3 months
The MFI contains 20 items classified into four dimensions: general fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activities and motivation. The statements are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from "Yes, that is true" to "No, that is not true") representing the patient's current feeling. Low MFI scores reflect a higher degree of fatigue.
3 months
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: 6 months
The MFI contains 20 items classified into four dimensions: general fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activities and motivation. The statements are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from "Yes, that is true" to "No, that is not true") representing the patient's current feeling. Low MFI scores reflect a higher degree of fatigue.
6 months
EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 3 months
The EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome in stroke and was designed for self-completion by respondents. The 5 items of the questionnaire provide a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ-Index has shown reasonable validity and acceptable responsiveness for detecting the health-related quality of life in stroke patients.
3 months
EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 6 months
The EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome in stroke and was designed for self-completion by respondents. The 5 items of the questionnaire provide a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ-Index has shown reasonable validity and acceptable responsiveness for detecting the health-related quality of life in stroke patients.
6 months
Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS)
Time Frame: 3 months
The Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS) includes 22 items that have each been worded to ask whether the respondent has a need and whether the need is met, and the potential complexity of "double-barrelled" questions was managed by providing Yes or No response modalities, with instructions to tick 'No' if there is no need or if the need has been met. Participants are also asked to indicate what level of help (from care givers/friends) they have received in completing the questionnaires, if any.
3 months
Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS) includes 22 items that have each been worded to ask whether the respondent has a need and whether the need is met, and the potential complexity of "double-barrelled" questions was managed by providing Yes or No response modalities, with instructions to tick 'No' if there is no need or if the need has been met. Participants are also asked to indicate what level of help (from care givers/friends) they have received in completing the questionnaires, if any.
6 months
Short version of Sarason's Social Support Questionnaire (6 items SSQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
Used to measure two dimensions of social support : satisfaction and availability perceptions of social support and satisfaction with that social support. Each item is a question that solicits a two-part answer: Part 1 asks participants to list all the people that fit the description of the question, and Part 2 asks participants to indicate how satisfied they are in general with these people using a 6-point Licket scale (from 1. Very unsatisfied to 6. Extremely satisfied).
3 months
Short version of Sarason's Social Support Questionnaire (6 items SSQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
Used to measure two dimensions of social support : satisfaction and availability perceptions of social support and satisfaction with that social support. Each item is a question that solicits a two-part answer: Part 1 asks participants to list all the people that fit the description of the question, and Part 2 asks participants to indicate how satisfied they are in general with these people using a 6-point Licket scale (from 1. Very unsatisfied to 6. Extremely satisfied).
6 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ)
Time Frame: Day 0
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ) assesses physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains including: a. leisure time physical activity, b. domestic and gardening activities, c. work related physical activity, d. transport-related physical activity. The IPAQ short form asks about three specific types of activity undertaken in these four domains : walking, moderate-intensity activities and vigorous-intensity activities. Computation of the total score for the short form requires summation of the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities.
Day 0
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ) assesses physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains including: a. leisure time physical activity, b. domestic and gardening activities, c. work related physical activity, d. transport-related physical activity. The IPAQ short form asks about three specific types of activity undertaken in these four domains : walking, moderate-intensity activities and vigorous-intensity activities. Computation of the total score for the short form requires summation of the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities.
3 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ) assesses physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains including: a. leisure time physical activity, b. domestic and gardening activities, c. work related physical activity, d. transport-related physical activity. The IPAQ short form asks about three specific types of activity undertaken in these four domains : walking, moderate-intensity activities and vigorous-intensity activities. Computation of the total score for the short form requires summation of the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities.
6 months
Percentage of stroke risk
Time Frame: Day 0
The Riskometer application will be used to measure the stroke risk based on recorded parameters. The Stroke Riskometer app assesses the possibility of suffering a stroke using a number of health and lifestyle factors including age, sex, ethnic origin, blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, anti-hypertension, tobacco, cardiovascular history, weight / height ratio, cholesterol level, diabetes, alcohol, stress, cognitive decline, family and personal history of stroke and TIA, history of head trauma and myocardial infarction
Day 0
Percentage of stroke risk
Time Frame: 3 months
The Riskometer application will be used to measure the stroke risk based on recorded parameters. The Stroke Riskometer app assesses the possibility of suffering a stroke using a number of health and lifestyle factors including age, sex, ethnic origin, blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, anti-hypertension, tobacco, cardiovascular history, weight / height ratio, cholesterol level, diabetes, alcohol, stress, cognitive decline, family and personal history of stroke and TIA, history of head trauma and myocardial infarction
3 months
Percentage of stroke risk
Time Frame: 6 months
The Riskometer application will be used to measure the stroke risk based on recorded parameters. The Stroke Riskometer app assesses the possibility of suffering a stroke using a number of health and lifestyle factors including age, sex, ethnic origin, blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, anti-hypertension, tobacco, cardiovascular history, weight / height ratio, cholesterol level, diabetes, alcohol, stress, cognitive decline, family and personal history of stroke and TIA, history of head trauma and myocardial infarction
6 months
Recurrent stroke
Time Frame: 3 months
Recurrent stroke or TIA post-stroke defined by standard clinico-radiological criteria
3 months
Recurrent stroke
Time Frame: 6 months
Recurrent stroke or TIA post-stroke defined by standard clinico-radiological criteria
6 months
Cardiovascular events post-stroke
Time Frame: 3 months
Cardiovascular events post-stroke defined by standard clinical criteria
3 months
Cardiovascular events post-stroke
Time Frame: 6 months
Cardiovascular events post-stroke defined by standard clinical criteria
6 months
Intensity of post-stroke pain
Time Frame: Day 0
Intensity of post-stroke pain using a visual analog scale
Day 0
Intensity of post-stroke pain
Time Frame: 3 months
Intensity of post-stroke pain using a visual analog scale
3 months
Intensity of post-stroke pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Intensity of post-stroke pain using a visual analog scale
6 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Visit 1 ; 3 months ; 6 months
Quality of sleep using the item 6 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Visit 1 ; 3 months ; 6 months
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Visit 1 ; 3 months ; 6 months
Blood pressure
Visit 1 ; 3 months ; 6 months
HbA1c measure
Time Frame: 3 months ; 6 months
Glycaemic control using the HbA1c measure
3 months ; 6 months
LDLc plasmatic measure
Time Frame: 3 months ; 6 months
Lipidic control using the LDLc plasmatic measure
3 months ; 6 months
CRPus plasmatic measure
Time Frame: 3 months ; 6 months
Systemic inflammation will be evaluated using CRPus plasmatic measure
3 months ; 6 months
Smoking Index (HSI)
Time Frame: 3 months ; 6 months
Tobacco use will be evaluated using the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
3 months ; 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Bordeaux

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Igor SIBON, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHUBX 2017/49
  • 2019-A00898-49 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings