Extension of Phase 3 Gene Therapy for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

September 23, 2025 updated by: Helixmith Co., Ltd.

Long-term, Prospective, Non-interventional, Extension of a Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety & Efficacy of Engensis (VM202) in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

The purpose of this study is to explore the overall safety profile and durability of efficacy of Engensis (VM202) in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

All subjects still in follow-up for the VMDN-003 study or who have completed the Day 270 visit within the prior 90 days will be approached to enroll in the long-term safety extension study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the phase III VMDN-003 study, subjects received 2 treatments of either Engensis (VM202) or placebo administered as intramuscular injections into bilateral calves on Days 0 and 14, and Days 90 and 104. Primary efficacy was evaluated 90 days following the first injection. The growth potential for Hepatocyte Growth Factor make long-term follow-up important both for safety and efficacy: in order for Engensis to be a candidate for chronic treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, it must be demonstrated not to induce unexpected adverse events with repeated dosing; and the potential for reversal or stabilization of diabetic neuropathy using only one or two treatments of Engensis may make it especially attractive compared to current treatments which must be taken daily for the duration of the disease. A safety extension to the VMDN-003 study is therefore warranted.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
101

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85023
        • Arizona Research Center
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • Clinical Trials, Inc.
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95821
        • Northern California Research
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • Center for Clinical Research
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • Neurological Research Institute
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • Diablo Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
        • Innovative Research of West Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • University of Florida McKnight Brain Institute
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33603
        • Clinical Research of West Florida
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • The Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • Raleigh Neurology Associates, P.A.
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Nerve And Muscle Center Of Texas
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23510
        • EVMS (Eastern Virginia Medical School)
    • Washington
      • Renton, Washington, United States, 98057
        • Rainier Clinical Research Center, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Were randomized and dosed in the VMDN-003 study
  2. Received all intramuscular injections of study drug on Days 0, 14, 90, and 104 in the VMDN-003 study
  3. Were in follow-up for the VMDN-003 study or had completed Day 270 within the last 90 days prior to signing consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Were using an investigational drug or treatment
  2. Were unable or unwilling to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Subjects who received Placebo
Placebo, vehicle
Drug: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients who Received Placebo
No study drug is administered in this study. Patients who received Placebo in the previous trial (VMDN-003) will remain blinded and were evaluated in this trial for long-term safety and efficacy.
Experimental: Subjects who received Engensis (VM202)
VM202, Engensis
Genetic: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients who Received Engensis (VM202)
No study drug is administered in this study. Patients who received Engensis (VM202) in the previous trial (VMDN-003) will remain blinded and were evaluated in this trial for long-term safety and efficacy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term Safety for Engensis Versus Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 365
Long-term (6 months) safety in terms of the incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events for Subjects who received Engensis or Placebo (in the prior VMDN-003 study)
Baseline through Day 365

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Change in the Average 24-hour Pain Score From Baseline (Day 0 of Study VMDN-003) to Day 365 for Engensis Versus Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline to the Day 365
The Average 24-hour Pain Score was obtained from the Daily Pain and Sleep Interference Diary. The change in the Average 24-hour Pain Score was determined from baseline (Day 0 of Study VMDN-003) to the Day 365 visit. The Average 24-hour Pain Score is an 11-point numerical scale with scores from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Possible Pain).
Baseline to the Day 365
Change in the Average 24-hour Pain Score From Day 270 to Day 365 for Engensis Versus Placebo
Time Frame: Day 270 to Day 365
The Average 24-hour Pain Score is from the Daily Pain and Sleep Interference Diary. The change in the Average 24-hour Pain Score was determined for Day 270 to Day 365. The Average 24-hour Pain Score is an 11-point numerical scale with scores from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Possible Pain).
Day 270 to Day 365
Patient's Global Impression of Change at the Day 365 Visit for Engensis Versus Placebo
Time Frame: At the Day 365 visit

The Patient's Global Impression of Change was completed by subjects (self-administered) at the Day 365 visit. The subject evaluated how his/her overall status had changed since the start of the study using a 7-point Patient's Global Impression of Change questionnaire scale, where 1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Minimally Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Worse, 6 = Much Worse, and 7 = Very Much Worse.

The Outcome Measure was the Patient's Global Impression of Change Categories of Scores as follows: 1 = Very Much Improved or Much Improved, 0 = Minimally Improved/Worsened or No Change, and -1 = Much Worse or Very Much Worse.
At the Day 365 visit
Subgroup Analysis of the Change in the Average 24-hour Pain Score From Baseline (Day 0 of Study VMDN-003) to Day 365 for Engensis Versus Placebo for Subjects Without Gabapentin and/or Pregabalin Use at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 365
The Average 24-hour Pain Score was obtained from the Daily Pain and Sleep Interference Diary and the change in the Average 24-hour Pain Score from baseline (Day 0 of Study VMDN-003) to the Day 365 follow-up was determined. The Average 24-hour Pain Score is an 11-point numerical scale with scores from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Possible Pain).
Baseline to Day 365

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Helixmith Co., Ltd.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: John A. Kessler, MD, Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 24, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VMDN-003b

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Clinical Trials on Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients who Received Engensis (VM202)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings