Surgical Dressings After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

April 29, 2024 updated by: Chris Grandizio

Surgical Dressings After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity. While carpal tunnel release (CTR), both open (OCTR) and endoscopic (ECTR), is safe and effective, there are questions regarding the use of postoperative dressings after surgery. It is not currently known if dressing choices influence post-operative pain, function or patient satisfaction after ECTR. A less cumbersome dressing (bandaid) may allow patients to perform daily tasks with more ease after surgery. The purpose of this investigation is to compare postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction after ECTR for patients treated with conventional post-operative bulky soft tissue dressings versus those treated with a bandaid after surgery. The hypothesis is that patients using a bandaid after surgery will have an easier time with functional tasks after surgery and that pain scores will not significantly differ between the two groups. Furthermore, this study aims to determine if there are differences in patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, complications, and unscheduled healthcare contact between these two groups. This will be a randomized, controlled investigation.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity. While carpal tunnel release (CTR), both open (OCTR) and endoscopic (ECTR), is safe and effective, there are questions regarding the use of postoperative dressings after surgery. With recent attention to the opioid epidemic, there have been increasing efforts to reduce narcotic usage postoperatively while still controlling expected postoperative pain. Recent authors have found that many patients, particularly older patients, do not require any opioid analgesia after CTR with 47% of men and 36% of women consuming no narcotics after CTR (CHAPMAN). Furthermore, while splints have historically been used after surgery, their need has recently been questioned (LOGLI). It is not currently known if dressing choices influence post-operative pain, function or patient satisfaction after ECTR. A less cumbersome dressing (bandaid) may allow patients to perform daily tasks with more ease after surgery.

The purpose of this investigation is to compare postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction after ECTR for patients treated with conventional post-operative bulky soft tissue dressings versus those treated with a bandaid after surgery. The hypothesis is that patients using a bandaid after surgery will have an easier time with functional tasks after surgery and that pain scores will not significantly differ between the two groups. Furthermore, this study aims to determine if there are differences in patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, complications, and unscheduled healthcare contact between these two groups. This will be a randomized, controlled investigation.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 years of age or older
  2. Patients undergoing primary, elective, unilateral ECTR under monitored anesthesia care with local anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing ECTR as part of a worker's compensation case
  2. Patients currently incarcerated
  3. Subject who cannot read and speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional post-operative bulky soft tissue dressing
  1. Intraoperative: MAC-Local Anesthesia; Local anesthetic mixture will be distributed in both the subcutaneous tissue and within the carpal canal
  2. Postoperative: Non-opioid medications only; Conventional post-operative bulky soft tissue dressing (Xeroform, 4x4s, Webril, Ace Wrap; Worn until first postoperative visit)
Conventional bulky soft tissue dressing
Experimental: Bandaid post-operative dressing
  1. Intraoperative: MAC-Local Anesthesia; Local anesthetic mixture will be distributed in both the subcutaneous tissue and within the carpal canal
  2. Postoperative: Non-opioid medications only; Bandaid over incision (Patient given an edema glove to wear starting post-operative day 1; Dressing change be changed post-operative day 2 and as needed after that)
Bandaid dressing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
Time Frame: 0-12 months
best 0-10 worst; continuous scale to measure current pain level
0-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QuickDASH
Time Frame: 0-12 months
best 0-100 worst; functional outcome score for disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand
0-12 months
PROMIS Pain Interference
Time Frame: 0-12 months
best 0-100 worst; measures the effects of a patient's pain on their daily activities and lifestyle
0-12 months
PROMIS Self-Efficacy Manage Symptoms
Time Frame: 0-12 months
best 0-100 worst; measures a patient's ability to cope with their symptoms related to the procedure
0-12 months
PROMIS Upper Extremity
Time Frame: 0-12 months
worst 0-100 best; measures physical function of upper extremities
0-12 months
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
Time Frame: 0-12 months
ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability; -specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status
0-12 months
number of participants with unscheduled healthcare contact
Time Frame: 0-12 months
unscheduled healthcare contact includes patient calls/messages, emergency room visits, or scheduled clinic visits
0-12 months
morphine equivalents
Time Frame: 0-12 months
morphine equivalents consumed for post-operative pain control
0-12 months
number of participants with complications
Time Frame: 0-12 months
complications after surgery including infection and delayed healing
0-12 months
Satisfaction with overall outcome
Time Frame: 0-12 months
11 point Likert scale; worst 0-10 best
0-12 months
Satisfaction postoperative pain control
Time Frame: 0-12 months
11 point Likert scale; worst 0-10 best
0-12 months
Satisfaction with the dressing
Time Frame: 0-12 months
11 point Likert scale; worst 0-10 best
0-12 months
Grip Strength Measurement
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Using Jamar Hand Dynamometer, in kilograms ranging from worst 0-90 best
0-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Grandizio, MD, Geisinger Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-0474

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Conventional bulky soft tissue dressing

Search Similar Trials