TIVA Admnistration and Autologous Fat Transfer in Breast Reconstruction (TIVA)

September 8, 2020 updated by: Maria Kapritsou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

TIVA Versus Volatile Anesthetics Admnistration on Stress and Pain Levels During Autologous Fat Transfer in Breast Reconstruction, in a Day Care Center

The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of intravenous anesthetics versus the administration of volatile anesthetics on stress and pain levels during autologous fat transfer for breast reconstruction in a Day Care Center.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The sample of the study will be patients who will have Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction.

Patients will be divided into 2 groups. The TIVA group (N = 23) will be administrated intravenous anesthesia (propofol-remifentanil), while the DES group (N = 23) volatile anesthetics (desflurane-remifentanil).

Specifically, the TIVA group will include patients over 50 years of age with high risk of nausea / vomiting and postoperative delirium, as well as suspicion of malignant hyperthermia. Patients with cardiac and respiratory problems will be included in the DES group.

The following data will be collected in the Data Sheet: Patient Demographics (Gender, Age), Body Mass Index (Body Height- Body Weight). Simultaneously, the pain levels will be evaluated by VAS Optical Analogue Scale of VAS 0-10 in PACU, preoperatively and postoperatively, and perioperative pain levels will be assessed with CPOT scale (values 0-8).

Stress levels will be evaluated with 3 NAS questions: a. How sad do you feel right now? b. How anxious do you feel right now? and c. How optimistic do you feel right now?. The 3 NAS questions will also be given preoperatively and postoperatively to the ward. The sedation levels will be assessed by RASS scale (values +4 to -5) and the Bispectral Index (BIS). The level of patient's awareness will be assessed by GCS Scale (3 (indicating deep unconsciousness) and either 14 (original scale) or 15 (more widely used modified or revised scale)).

The presence or absence of nausea / vomiting and the appearance of immediate postoperative complications will be examined. Finally, post-operative stress will be examined with stress biomarkers, salivary ACTH hormone and salivary cortisol hormone.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Athens, Greece, 11522
        • "Saint Savvas" Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

TIVA group

  • patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) PHYSICALSTATUS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM I-III
  • age >50 years
  • high risk of nausea / vomiting
  • high risk of postoperative delirium
  • suspicion of malignant hyperthermia.

Volatile anesthesia

  • patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) PHYSICALSTATUS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM I-III
  • 20-70 years
  • Patients with cardiac problems
  • Patients with respiratory problems

Exclusion Criteria

•In both groups, the exclusion criteria are the opposite of the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Total intravenous anesthesia

The patients will recieve intravenous anesthesia (propofol-remifentanyl)

Recommended dosage:

Propofol: Induction dosage 1,5-2,5 mg/kg Remifentanyl: Induction dosage 0,5-1μg/min The preservation dosage will depend from patients' body weight, body height and BMI
Drug: Propofol
Patients will be divided into 2 groups. The TIVA group (N = 23) will be administrated intravenous anesthesia (propofol-remifentanil), while to the DES group (N = 23) volatile anesthetics (desflurane-remifentanil)
Other Names:
  • remifentanyl
  • desflurane
Experimental: volatile anesthesia

The patients will recieve volatile anesthesia (desflurane-remifentanyl)

Recommended dosage:

Desflurane dosage 6-7 MAC Remifentanyl: Induction dosage 0,5-1μg/min The preservation dosage will depend from patients' body weight, body height and BMI
Drug: Propofol
Patients will be divided into 2 groups. The TIVA group (N = 23) will be administrated intravenous anesthesia (propofol-remifentanil), while to the DES group (N = 23) volatile anesthetics (desflurane-remifentanil)
Other Names:
  • remifentanyl
  • desflurane

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Εvaluating stress levels
Time Frame: 1 day during hospitalization

Analyzing Cortisol and Adrenocorticotropic hormones levels in salivary samples.

Analyzing Cortisol and Adrenocorticotropic hormones levels in salivary samples in patients after breast recostruction in a day care center.

These measures will occured in three phases a. preoperatively, b. perioperatively c. in the PACU phase.
1 day during hospitalization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluating pain levels between the 2 protocols with scales perioperatively
Time Frame: 1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating perioperative pain levels between the two protocols with scale such as Critical Care Pain Observational Tool (CPOT scale, range 0-8(with a score of 0 = None and 8 = severe pain) )
1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating stress levels between the 2 protocols with scales
Time Frame: 1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating perioperative stress levels between the two protocols with scale, such as the self-experienced questions (range0-10, (with a score of 0 = None and 10 = Completely) ) how sad are you feeling?in two phases: a. preoperatively, b) in PACU
1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating Patients' Sedation
Time Frame: Perioperatively
Evaluation with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS scale, range +4 to -5, (with a score of -5 = unarousable and +4 = violent, immediate danger for the staff) ).
Perioperatively
Evaluating Patients' Sedation
Time Frame: Perioperatively
Evaluation with Bispectral index (BIS, range 0-100). A BIS score quantifies changes in the electrophysiologic state of the brain during anesthesia. In patients who are awake, a typical BIS score is 90 to 100. Complete suppression of cortical activity results in a BIS score of 0, known as a flat line. Lower numbers indicate a higher hypnotic effect. Overall, a BIS value below 60 is associated with a low probability of response to commands.
Perioperatively
Evaluating pain levels between the 2 protocols with scales in PACU
Time Frame: 1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating perioperative pain levels between the two protocols with scale such as Visual analogu pain scale (VAS, range 0-10, (with a score of 0 = None and 10 = severe pain) ) in PACU
1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating stress levels between the 2 protocols with scales
Time Frame: 1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating perioperative stress levels between the two protocols with scale, such as three self-experienced questions (range0-10, (with a score of 0 = None and 10 = Completely) ) how stressed are you feeling, in two phases: a. preoperatively, b) in PACU
1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating stress levels between the 2 protocols with scales
Time Frame: 1 day during hospitalization
Evaluating perioperative stress levels between the two protocols with scale, such as three self-experienced questions (range0-10, (with a score of 0 = None and 10 = Completely) ) how optimistic are you feeling, in two phases: a. preoperatively, b) in PACU
1 day during hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Saint Savvas Anticancer Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Evangelos Konstantinou, RN, PhD, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2834

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Propofol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings